Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016561
Original file (20080016561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       17 MARCH 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016561 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) be adjusted from 21 August 2008 to 7 March 2008 with all back pay and allowances.

2.  The applicant states that the policy memorandum (307-003) indicates that all officers who are past the 24-month mark will be promoted on the effective date of the Department of the Army policy memorandum.  He states he graduated from Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS) and was appointed Warrant Officer One (WO1) on 7 March 2006.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Departments of the Army and the Air Force, National Guard Bureau memorandum, dated 23 January 2007; two Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, memoranda, dated 22 December 2006 and 14 January 2005; his diploma from the WOCS, dated 7 March 2006; his diploma from the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course, dated 9 January 2008; and Orders 246-1015, dated 2 September 2008.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently serving in the Army National Guard in the rank of CW2.

2.  On 14 January 2005, the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 issued an Amendment to Policy Memorandum, subject: Promotion 
of Second Lieutenants (2LT) to First Lieutenant (1LT) and WO1 to CW2.  Paragraph 2 of this memorandum states that all Reserve Component (RC) officers (United States Army Reserve and Army National Guard of the United States) in the rank of 2LT will be promoted by the Human Resources Command (HRC) - Office of Promotions (Reserve Components) or the National Guard Bureau, as appropriate, to 1LT when they meet the 24 month time in grade requirement for promotion and complete the Officer Basic Course.  “This would apply to WO1, which would be promoted to CW2 when they meet the time in grade requirements (24 months) for promotion, and complete the Warrant Officer Basic Course.  In the case of ARNG officers, the State will publish a State promotion order and forward it to NGB-ARP no earlier than 90 days prior to the officer meeting the minimum time in grade requirement provided the officer has completed the Officer/Warrant Officer Basic Course and is otherwise eligible for promotion."  

3.  After having had prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard, the applicant was appointed in the Army National Guard on 7 March 2006 in the rank of WO1.  

4.  The applicant completed the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course on 9 January 2008.  

5.  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, The Adjutant General, Annville, PA, Orders 242-1006, dated 29 August 2008, promoted the applicant to CW2/(W-2) with an effective date and DOR of 21 August 2008.  

6.  Departments of the Army and the Air Force National Guard Bureau Special Orders Number 228 AR, dated 8 September 2008, granted the applicant Federal Recognition for promotion to CW2 with an effective date of 21 August 2008.

7.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the National Guard Bureau.  The National Guard Bureau recommended approval of the applicant’s request for adjustment of his DOR to CW2 from 21 August 2008 to 7 March 2008 with all back pay and entitlements.  The opinion stated that the applicant was appointed to WO1 on 7 March 2006 and on 7 March 2008, he met the time in grade requirements for CW2.  The opinion referenced National Guard Regulation 600-101, Table 7-1, which states the minimum time in grade for promotion to CW2 is 2 years.  The opinion stated the applicant completed the Initial Entry Rotary Wing and Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course on 9 January 2009 (sic 2008), thereby meeting the education requirements.  The opinion also referenced National Guard Regulation 600-101, Table 7-2, which requires the completion of the WOBC for promotion to CW2.  
8.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comments. He concurred with the advisory opinion rendered in his case.  

9.  Table 7-1 of National Guard Regulation 600-101 shows that the minimum time-in grade requirement for promotion to the rank of CW2 is 2 years in the lower grade.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was appointed in the Army National Guard on 7 March 2006 as a WO1.  

2.  The applicant completed the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course on 9 January 2008.

3.  Orders were published which promoted the applicant to CW2 with an effective date and DOR of 21 August 2008.  He was granted Federal recognition as CW2 with an effective date of 21 August 2008.  

4.  Based on the applicant's meeting the time in grade requirements and completing the Warrant Officer Basic Course, he should have been promoted to CW2 with an effective date and DOR of 7 March 2008 (2 years from the date of his initial appointment).  

5.  Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show he was promoted to CW2 with an effective date and DOR of 7 March 2008 and granted Federal Recognition on this date.   

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending his records to show he was promoted to CW2 effective 7 March 2008 and to show he was extended Federal Recognition effective 7 March 2008 in the rank of CW2; and

	b.  paying the applicant any pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016561



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016561



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014967

    Original file (20080014967.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Acting Chief, Personnel Division, NGB stated that the applicant was appointed WO1 on 7 March 2006 and on 7 March 2008, he met the time in grade requirements of National Guard Regulation 600-101, Table 7-1, which states that the minimum time in grade and mandatory board maximum years in the lower grade for promotion to CW2 is 2 years. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO1 with a date of rank of 7 March 2006 and based on the requirement for completion of 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018199

    Original file (20080018199.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 7 March 2007 upon his completion of WOCS and execution of an oath of office. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by a second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board on 13 December 2007 and the applicant executed a second oath of office on that date. Based on the recommendations of the second GAARNG Federal Recognition Board, the NGB issued orders awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029365

    Original file (20100029365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (Warrant Officers - Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides that the effective date of Federal Recognition for original appointment is the date on which the warrant officer executes the oath of office in the State. Had the application for permanent Federal Recognition been properly and timely processed, the applicant's date of rank for WO1 would have been 20 September 2008 and he would have been promoted to CW2, effective 7 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012484

    Original file (20080012484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his original date of appointment to warrant officer one (WO1) was wrong and was corrected in a previous case he submitted to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). Had it not been for the need to correct his DOR for initial appointment to WO1, the applicant would have been promoted to CW2 on 9 August 2007 as provided for in the Department of the Army memorandum, dated 14 January 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005458

    Original file (20080005458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2, in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2) of this regulation, except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army certification, the following statement will be entered on the record of proceedings (NGB Form 89): "the applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a warrant officer WO1 as provided by NGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004086

    Original file (20090004086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed a WO1 in the Army National Guard on 28 June 2006. Although the applicant requests that his DOR be adjusted to 29 June 2008, in accordance with the governing regulation, it would be equitable to correct his military records to show his effective date of promotion to CW2 is 28 June 2008 with a DOR of 28 June 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012994C071029

    Original file (20060012994C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    NGB Special Orders Number 8 AR dated 12 January 2006 granted the applicant Federal Recognition as a WO1 effective 28 October 2005. NGR 600-101, paragraph 9-15b(6) states in the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal Recognition as a CW2 in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2), except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army MOS certification (i.e., completion of WOBC), the following statement will be entered on the NGB Form 89: “The applicant is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007466

    Original file (20080007466.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007466 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2) be adjusted from 9 February 2006 to 24 July 2001. The opinion stated that the applicant had 4 years, 2 months, and 26 days of service as a WO1 when he was appointed in the KYARNG on 20 October 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012673

    Original file (20090012673.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a WO1 in the Army National Guard on 18 November 2005. Based on the foregoing and in accordance with the governing regulation, it would be equitable to correct her military records to show her effective date of promotion to CW2 as 18 November 2007 with a DOR of 18 November 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006623

    Original file (20130006623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Paragraph 9-15b(6) states in the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2 in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2), except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army MOS certification (i.e., completion of WOBC), the following statement will be entered on the NGB Form 89: The applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a Warrant Officer, W1, as...