Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016490
Original file (20080016490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        10 February 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080016490 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his last name as F_____.

2.  The applicant states that he had his last name changed from W_______ to F_____ after he was discharged from active duty.  He would like to be issued a DD Form 215 (Correction of DD Form 214) using his current legal name.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and the Judgment from the Fourth Judicial Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 17 November 1972.  His DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows his last name as W_______.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 62B (engineer equipment repairman).  

3.  On an unknown date, he completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) and entered his last name as W_______ in Block 1 (First Name - Middle Name - Maiden Name (if any) - Last Name).  In Block 3 (Alias(es), Nickname(s), or Changes in Name (Other than by marriage)), he entered the name J____ F_____.  On 22 November 1972, he completed a DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request) which shows his last name as W_____.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record - Part II) shows his last name as W_____.

5.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Aviation Center and Fort Rucker, Special Orders Number 14, dated 18 January 1974, promoted the applicant to specialist four, in primary MOS 62B2O.  These orders show his last name as W_______.  

6.  The remaining documents in the applicant’s service personnel records show his last name as W_____.

7.  Headquarters, United States Army Aviation Center and Fort Rucker, Special Orders Number 210, dated 22 October 1974, released the applicant from active duty with an effective date of 13 November 1974.  These orders show his last name as W_______.

8.  The applicant was released from active duty on 13 November 1974.  Item 1 (Last Name - First Name - Middle Name) on his DD Form 214 shows his last name as W_____.

9.  The applicant provided a Judgment from the Fourth Judicial Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana, which shows his last name was changed from W_______ to F_____ . on 16 June 1977.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should actually reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend that those records be changed.

2.  The applicant’s court document shows his last name was changed from  W_______  to F_____on 16 June 1977, subsequent to his separation date.  

3.  Although the applicant appears to be currently using the last name, F_____, he served on and was released from active duty under the last name W_____.  While the applicant's desire to have the records changed is understandable, there is no basis for compromising the integrity of the Army's records.  This Board action will be filed in his military records so a record of the name he is currently using will be on hand.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   XXX_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016490





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080016490



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016424

    Original file (20140016424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his last name as C____ instead of S____. The applicant's military service records show he served in the Regular Army under the last name S____. Army records created after his separation from the Regular Army show his name was recorded as C____.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012802

    Original file (20090012802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his military records be changed to show his birth name K______ I. C______ and social security number (SSN) ***-**-1972 instead of his adopted name K______ R. W_______ and SSN ***-**-8352. Item 1 (Service No./SSAN) of the available DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract-Armed Forces of the United States) shows SSN ***-**-8352. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000925

    Original file (20150000925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her last name as "R___" and to show she was awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted using the last name as "R___" and changed her last name to "W_______" while serving on active duty. She did not provide any evidence showing she changed her last name back to to "R___" while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012425

    Original file (20120012425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his first and middle names were transposed and his military records show his name as "James William W_____." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002444

    Original file (20140002444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 1 (Name - Last, First, Middle) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract-Armed Forces of the United States) shows the name of Jerome Travis W_____ Jr. All of the official documents contained in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) show his last name, first name, and middle name as W_____, Jerome Travis Jr. 3. The fact that subsequent to service the applicant underwent a name change does not provide a sufficiently mitigating basis for changing the information recorded in the military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003161

    Original file (20080003161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board. A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 13 May 1982, in the applicant’s service personnel records, recommends removal of his bar to reenlistment and his rank is shown as PFC. Department of the Army, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri Orders D-02-012346, dated 18 February 1986, discharged the applicant from the Ready Reserve effective 19 February 1986 in the rank of SP4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015793

    Original file (20130015793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. When asked if any civilian employees who work for the clinic informed him the applicant smoked spice he stated Kim, the receptionist, told him someone told her the applicant smoked spice or used other drugs. She also stated the applicant called her at home after hours and told her not to tell about the other employee moving in with her. She told him that the applicant volunteered to take a urinalysis and she told her she didn't have to at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003087

    Original file (20150003087.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following evidence in support of his application: * self-authored request * DD Form 214 * DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article, UCMJ) * reduction order * social security card CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004033

    Original file (20140004033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 January 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140004033 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. While the applicant's desire to change his DD Form 214 to show his name as shown on his birth certificate is understood, the available evidence shows he entered, served, and was separated from active duty under the name shown on his DD Form 214 and all other documents in his OMPF. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018870

    Original file (20110018870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.