Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015951
Original file (20080015951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  29 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015951 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show a disability. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 reads no specific disability.   His DD Form 214 reads "failure to meet established physical standards (no disability)."

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve in the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 24 March 1977.  On 15 August 1977 he was discharged from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade     E-3, on 16 August 1977, for 3 years.

3.  On 7 October 1977, the applicant was advised that a medical examination on 6 October 1977 revealed that he had a medical condition that would have disqualified him from entry into the military service had it been detected at that time.  He was also advised that he could apply for separation from the military by reason of having been erroneously enlisted.  He was further advised that the medical condition did not disqualify him from retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), Chapter 3.  His records do not contain a copy of the medical examination.

4.  On the same date, the applicant elected to make application for his separation from the military.

5.  On 19 October 1977, the appropriate convening authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-9, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards.

6.  The applicant was honorably discharged from active duty, in pay grade E-3, on 25 October 1977, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9 for failure to meet established physical standards (no disability).  His signature is annotated on the DD Form 214.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-9 specifically provided for the discharge of personnel who did not meet the medical fitness standards.  It stated that personnel who did not meet the medical fitness standards for enlistment or induction would be discharged.  Commanders were authorized to order discharge of individuals who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for induction or initial enlistment.  A medical board proceeding was required to establish that a medical condition permanently disqualified the individual for entry in the military service had it been detected at that time and did not disqualify the individual from retention in the military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to a correction to his DD Form 214 to show a specific disability.  

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the Army on 8 August 1977 and a medical condition was revealed on 6 October 1977 that would have disqualified him for entry into the military service.  As such, he was separated from active duty in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, for failure to meet established physical standards (no disability).  This was acknowledged by his signature on his DD Form 214.  His discharge was in compliance with applicable regulations with no procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

3.  The applicant's contention and his belief that his DD Form 214 should have stated otherwise is acknowledged; however, these are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant a change to his DD Form 214.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015951



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015951


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023230

    Original file (20100023230.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither his medical records nor the complete facts and circumstances of his discharge are available for the Board's review; however, his official military personnel file contains a DD Form 214 that was completed at the time of discharge. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021038

    Original file (20140021038.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was offered surgery at the hospital in the next 2 days versus a separation from the military for a condition that existed prior to entry in the service (EPTS) per Army regulations. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged on 29 September 1989 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), paragraph 5-11, by reason of not meeting procurement medical fitness standards - no disability, with an uncharacterized character of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001687

    Original file (20150001687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within 6 months of the Soldier's initial entrance on active duty that: (1) would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time and (2) does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001805

    Original file (20090001805.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, the front pages of his Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and SF 93 (Report of Medical History) from his physical examination on 19 October 1976; a two-page SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), initially dated 24 January 1977; a DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition - Physical Profile Record), dated 26 January 1977; a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), subject: Placement on Outpatient Medical Hold Status, dated 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006223

    Original file (20090006223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the record does include a DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged after completing a total of 2 months and 12 days of active military service under the provisions of paragraph 5-11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of not meeting procurement medical fitness standards-no disability. A medical proceeding conducted by an Entrance Physical Standards Board, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024694

    Original file (20110024694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-9, in effect at the time, provided for the separation of personnel who did not meet procurement medical fitness standards and stated that: a. As an exception, a member who had completed basic training and was found to meet the requirements of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3, but who requested to complete the period of service for which enlisted may be retained in the service. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017278

    Original file (20110017278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show a medical discharge. The applicant provides: * Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated, 20 June 1980 * SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 27 June 1981 * DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile Board Proceedings), dated 29 June 1981 * Separation orders, dated 20 July 1981 * DD Form 214 and DD Form 214 worksheet CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021307

    Original file (20120021307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11, states Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards when accepted for enlistment or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty will be separated. Medical proceedings, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by an appropriate military medical authority within 6 months...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019536

    Original file (20080019536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that all his military personnel service records are wrong. The MEB recommended separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-9, Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations) and paragraph 2-24c of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) for not meeting medical procurement fitness standards at the time of his entry onto active duty. The applicant has not submitted any evidence to show his date of discharge is incorrect.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013251

    Original file (20080013251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, a medical discharge and correction to his discharge date. If a Soldier is found unfit because of physical disability, this regulation provides for disposition of the Soldier according to applicable laws and regulations. The evidence shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 March 1988 and was discharged on 12 April 1988.