IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 21 January 2009
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015854
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, a change to his RE (Reentry) code. For him to rejoin the service, he needs to have his RE code changed to a "3" from a "4."
2. The applicant states, in effect, that it has been 8 years now and he just noticed his RE code being a "4." He was thinking of rejoining the service but found out that his RE code is a "4." He further states that another paper he has shows his RE code as a "3"; so he has two papers that are conflicting. He is just trying to understand why his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) has an RE code of "4" and another paper has an RE code of "3."
3. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 Worksheet, a copy of a Separation Preprocessing Final Processing Checklist, and a copy of a DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of
justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted,
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the US Army Reserve (USAR) Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP), on 16 September 1999. On
26 September 1999 he was discharged from the DEP and on 27 September 1999 he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years. He was assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to undergo his basic combat training.
3. On 3 January 2000, the applicant absented himself without authority from his unit, Company B, 58th Transportation Battalion, Fort Leonard Wood, and remained absent until 7 March 2000. The applicant returned to military control at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and was assigned to Battery A, Personnel and Support Battalion, US Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill.
4. On 8 March 2000, court-martial charges were brought against the applicant for absenting himself from his unit on 3 January 2000 and remaining so absent until 7 March 2000.
5. On 9 March 2000, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.
6. The applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by courts-martial was approved on 10 August 2000. The approval authority directed that an under other than honorable conditions discharge be issued to the applicant.
7. The applicant was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, in the rank and pay grade of private, E-1, on 25 August 2000, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial. On the date of his discharge, the applicant had completed 8 months and 25 days creditable active military service.
8. The applicant was given a separation code of "KFS" (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial) and an RE code of "4."
9. The "separation preprocessing final processing checklist" the applicant provided in support of his request shows an SPD (Separation Program Designator) code of "KFS" and an RE Code of "3."
10. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
11. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) and provides the guidance for the issuance of RE codes upon separation from active duty. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or reason for discharge. This same regulation covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the USAR. Chapter 3 of the regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. It states, in pertinent part, that these codes are not to be considered derogatory in nature; they are simply codes that are used for identification of an enlistment processing procedure.
12. RE code 1 applies to persons who are completing their period of active service who are eligible for immediate reenlistment. RE code 3 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waivable. RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, and the disqualification is not waivable.
13. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that "KFS" is the appropriate SPD code for individuals separated who voluntarily request discharge in lieu of court-martial.
14. The SPD/RE Code Cross-Reference Table indicates that an SPD of "KFS" requires an RE code of 4.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The separation preprocessing final processing checklist the applicant provided in support of his request shows an SPD code of "KFS" and an RE code of "3." This document is an unofficial document which appears to have as its intended purpose the collection of information for transfer to a DD Form 214 in the process of its completion.
3. The evidence shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial, and as such, his DD Form 214 was coded to show an SPD code of "KFS" and a corresponding RE Code of "4."
4. Based upon the reason for his discharge, the applicant was properly given RE code "4" and there is insufficient evidence that would warrant changing his RE code.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ___x____ ____x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________x_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080015854
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080015854
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150002336
Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to merit a partial upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions for the following reasons: a. Board Vote: Character Change: 5 No Change: 0 Reason...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002408C071029
On 15 December 2000, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court- martial. On 20 December 2001, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075397C070403
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. He indicated that while a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014222
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his reentry (RE) code as 1 vice 4 so he can enlist in any branch of the service without a waiver. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if the discharge request was approved, he might be discharged under other than honorable conditions. This regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130013374
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 23 March 2007 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200/Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: C Co, Troop Command, Brooke Army Medical Center Fort Sam Houston, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 14 August 2000, indefinite g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 years, 6 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 17 years, 6 months, 1 day i. On 21 March 2007, the separation authority...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024089
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial. His request for a chapter 10 discharge, even after appropriate and proper consultation with a military lawyer, tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial conviction and the punitive discharge that he might have received.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011030
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, there is no evidence which shows she was a victim of sexual harassment. The applicant's RE code was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations at the time of her separation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017031
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code KFS is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the discharge process, the assigned RE-4 code was proper and equitable based on the authority and reason for his discharge, and it remains valid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012276
The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 . The evidence of record further confirms his RE code was assigned based on his separation under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007396
The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 3 years on 6 May 1997. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "KFS" code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200.