Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015661
Original file (20080015661.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	21 January 2009  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015661 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be promoted to private first class/pay 
grade E-3.

2.  The applicant states he always believed for many years that he had made private first class.  He states he does not think he was paid as a private first class and he knows it is not on his military records.  He does not think he was demoted.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his reissued DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 3 October 1983 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 August 1982.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of 94B (Food Service Specialist).

3.  Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to private/pay 
grade E-2 on 26 February 1983.  There is no entry showing he was promoted to private first class.

4.  There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel record promoting him to private first class.

5.  On 3 October 1983, the applicant was discharged by reason of unsatisfactory performance.  He had completed 1 year, 1 month, and 8 days of active service that was characterized as under honorable conditions.  Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 shows the applicant was a private/pay grade E-2 on the date of discharge.

6.  ABCMR Docket AR2007001900, dated 10 April 2008, Record of Proceedings, changed the characterization of the applicant's discharge to honorable.  Paragraph 3 of Consideration of Evidence contains the statement "The applicant attained the grade of private first class/E-3…."  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no records or orders showing the applicant was promoted to private first class/pay grade E-3.

2.  In view of the above, the statement contained in ABCMR Docket AR20070019001 Record of Proceedings appears to be an error.  This is determined to be a harmless error in the Record of Proceedings as it did not affect the Board's decision concerning the characterization of service.  However, this error does not constitute authority to now promote the applicant.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015661



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015661



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014776

    Original file (20080014776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided no promotion orders or other documentary evidence to show that he was promoted back to the rank and pay grade of specialist four, E-4, before he was discharged. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for a correction to the rank and pay grade shown on his DD Form 214. ________X_________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096106C070212

    Original file (03096106C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Unfortunately the individual pay record provided by the applicant and the POW medical history, which the applicant completed in 1983, is not supported by any other documents available to the Board, including his original final payment voucher, which the applicant authenticated with the notation that he had been promoted to the rank of private first class on 29 September 1945. As such, in the absence of more...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014777

    Original file (20090014777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention that his rank was E-4 when he was placed on the TDRL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing his retired grade as specialist four/E-4 on U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Orders D106-10, dated 1 June 1983, and on U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017070

    Original file (20090017070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090017070 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. She had completed 3 years, 2 months, and 13 days of active service that was characterized as under other than honorable conditions. The applicant contends her under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge or a general discharge under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024429

    Original file (20110024429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 19 March 1985 in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4. Though there are no promotion orders in his records, his record contains Orders D-03-020063 issued by the USAR Personnel Center on 10 March 1987 discharging him from the USAR in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6. There is no evidence in his records and he has not provided any evidence to show he was promoted to SGT or SSG while serving on active duty or that he was an SSG at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015555

    Original file (20100015555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, the Article 15 nonjudicial punishments (NJP) imposed on 8 April 1983 and 29 April 1983 be set aside and her rank be restored to private first class/E-3. The psychologist's conclusion were reviewed by a psychiatrist. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was promoted following her NJP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009228

    Original file (20130009228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 22 July 1983, his immediate commander notified him that discharge action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014947

    Original file (20080014947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of her separation from active duty. Evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 4 May 1982 and that she was ordered to active duty for MOS training (9-week photo lithographer course) on 24 May 1983. She was released from active duty on 28 July 1983, and in accordance with the governing regulation, item 14 on her DD Form 214 for the period ending 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008660

    Original file (20110008660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that all of his records be corrected to show he retired in the rank title of sergeant first class. The evidence of record shows that this was the rank and grade he held upon his retirement. The applicant has provided no evidence that there is an error in his official record that can be corrected.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011970

    Original file (20110011970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged from the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. The regulation in effect at the time stated the NGB Form 22 would show the rank and grade at the time of separation. In the absence of official orders that conclusively show he was promoted to SP4/E-4 and held that rank/grade at the time of his discharge from the ARNG, there is insufficient...