Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015631
Original file (20080015631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       4 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015631 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his date of entry as 23 April 1975 instead of 16 May 1975.  

2.  The applicant states that he enlisted in the Regular Army and took his oath of enlistment on 23 April 1975 and that his DD Form 214 shows an incorrect entry due to a clerical error.  He adds that the incorrect entry date is affecting his entitlement to Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability compensation.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 19 December 1975; a copy of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract-Armed Forces of the United States), dated 23 April 1976; and a copy of his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 23 April 1975 in support of is application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) for a period of 6 years and executed an oath of enlistment on 23 April 1975.

3.  The applicant’s records also show that after spending 23 days in the DEP, he was discharged from the DEP on 15 May 1973 and enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 16 May 1975.  

4.  On 16 May 1975, the Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station (AFEES), Los Angeles, California, published Orders 96-2, assigning the applicant to active duty and ordering him to proceed to the U.S. Army Reception Station at Fort Polk, Louisiana.  

5.  The applicant’s records further show he completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was private (PV2)/E-2.  He was honorably discharged on 19 December 1975. 

6.  Item 15 of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge shows the entry “75  05  16,” Item 18d (Prior Inactive Service) shows the entry “0  0  23,” and Item 9d (Effective date) shows the entry “75  12  19.”

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  This regulation specified that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  The DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  Chapter 2 of this regulation governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In the version in effect at the time, Item 9d shows the Soldier’s transition date, the effective date of separation, discharge, or release from active duty and Item 15 shows the date of entry on active duty.  Extreme care is used when completing these blocks since post-service final pay, benefits, and retirement credit are based on this information.  Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) shows the amount of service, computed by subtracting item 15 from 9d.  Any DEP time which began prior to 31 December 1984 was not creditable service for pay purposes, but was entered in item 12e (total prior inactive service).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR under the DEP on 23 April 1975; however, his period of time in the DEP was not active service, nor is it creditable service.  He enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 16 May 1975 which is correctly shown on his DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 is a record of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  DEP is not active duty.  

2.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised to consult with his local/regional DVA representative.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to eligibility and/or procedures for applying for benefits.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


															XXX
      ______________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015631



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015631



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017799

    Original file (20090017799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 9d (Effective Date) of his initial DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show 25 May 1978 instead of 20 April 1978. The applicant's official military personnel file (OMPF) includes a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his initial enlistment processing. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 by amending item 15 to show an active duty entry date of 25 August 1975 and to amend the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003169

    Original file (20130003169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) with an effective date of 10 September 1979 be corrected to show his correct dates of active service. The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 10 September 1979 * General Discharge Certificate, dated 10 September 1979 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 9d (Effective Date) contains the entry "75 04 28" or 28 April 1975. c. Item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) contains the entry "0...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020826

    Original file (20090020826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also requests his total active Army service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 18 May 1992 be corrected to show he completed 17 years of active service instead of 13 years. The applicant provides copies of: * his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 18 May 1992 * his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 October 1978 * eight pages from his military personnel record CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was issued...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022597

    Original file (20120022597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he wants his DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 February 1975 to correctly reflect his 3-year commitment/enlistment * his first period of service should have been from 31 October 1972 through 4 November 1975 based upon his 3-year enlistment, making his second period of service beginning on 5 November 1975 * he wants his discharge under other than honorable conditions changed to under honorable conditions * his mental condition began in his first period of service,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004453

    Original file (20130004453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show all of his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and Regular Army. His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 9d (Effective Date) – "76 12 15 [15 December 1976]" * item 13 (Terminal Date of Reserve/Military Statutory Service Obligation) – "80 12 04 [4 December 1980]" * item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) – "75 01 09 [9 January 1975]" * item 18a (Net Active Service This Period) – "01 11 07...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003944

    Original file (20090003944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show 19 June 1974. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant enlisted in the Army on 19 June 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025724

    Original file (20100025724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 29 March 1978, RCPAC issued an AGUZ Form 115 documenting the applicant's retirement points for the period 6 January 1977 through 5 January 1978 and it shows he served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004792

    Original file (20110004792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 1995 to show his entry date as 3 September 1975 instead of 3 March 1979. Item 12a of the DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 September 1995 correctly shows the first date of his last immediate reenlistment for which a DD Form 214 was not issued, which is 3 March 1979. His DD Form 214 for the periods ending 2 March 1979 and 30 September 1995...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026757

    Original file (20100026757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His discharge packet is not available for review; however, his DD Form 214 shows he was administratively discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by a court-martial. He provided his DD Form 214, DD Form 4, and his DA Form 2-1, all which show his middle name as "Ray." As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * correcting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018200

    Original file (20100018200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Date of Birth), items 6a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) and 6b (Pay Grade), and item 9d (Effective Date) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to the reason for his separation within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.