Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015398
Original file (20080015398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	      2 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080015398 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her effective date of promotion and date of rank to first lieutenant (1LT) be corrected to 10 September 2007.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her promotion orders were delayed due to multiple transfers.

3.  The applicant provides copies of 12 sets of orders and 9 pages of e-mail correspondence related to her military status and promotion.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 March 1998 and served in that status until 17 October 2003.

2.  She served in an enlisted status in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) from 3 November 2003 through her appointment as a commissioned officer.

3.  On 7 September 2005, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant (2LT) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  She signed her Oath of Office on 10 September 2005, thereby establishing her date of rank as 10 September 2005 and her promotion eligibility date as 10 September 2007. 

4.  On 23 August 2006, the applicant was appointed as a 2LT in the TXARNG.

5.  The applicant transferred from the TXARNG to the USAR at a point not documented in her records.  She was subsequently transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).

6.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (USAHRC - St. Louis) Orders C-09-726804, dated 14 September 2007 released the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) and assigned her to U.S. Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland, effective 17 September 2007.

7.  The applicant's unit was mobilized on 11 November 2008 in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and the applicant was assigned duty in Afghanistan.

8. USAHRC - St. Louis, Orders B-01-800601, dated 16 January 2008, promoted the applicant to 1LT, effective 27 November 2007, with a DOR of 27 November 2007.

9.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and served on active duty from 5 November 2007 through 5 January 2009.

10.  In the development of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, USAHRC - St. Louis.  The official stated that Administrative Selection Boards are held four times a year for personnel being considered for promotion to 1LT.  The official further stated, in effect, that based on the applicant's multiple moves from organization to organization, she was promoted on the earliest date she was shown to have been eligible and on an approved scroll by the Secretary of Defense.  It was recommended that her request be denied.

11.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to provide her an opportunity to submit any comments or rebuttal.  The applicant did not provide a response.

12.  A review of the 2007 Administrative Selection Boards shows that the earliest board for which the applicant was eligible to be considered for promotion adjourned on 3 September 2007.  The results of this board were approved by the Secretary of Defense on 27 November 2007.  The next Administrative Selection Board convened in December 2007.

13.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), in pertinent part, states that a USAR 2LT will not be promoted before the date of completion of 2 years of promotion service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requested that her date of rank and effective date of rank be backdated to 10 September 2007.

2.  A promotion eligibility date is the earliest date that a Soldier can be promoted if otherwise qualified, not the date a Soldier will automatically be promoted.

3.  The administrative selection list that included the applicant was approved by the Secretary of Defense on 27 November 2007.  Therefore, this is the earliest effective date and date of rank that can be afforded the applicant.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015398



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080015398


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021458

    Original file (20090021458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was then transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) but was not promoted to 1LT until 30 May 1997, nearly 3 years after her appointment. If she can provide documentation to verify she met all promotion requirements on 1 October 1996, her DOR to 1LT should be changed to 1 October 1996. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) provides policy for selecting and promoting commissioned officers of both the ARNG and the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012186

    Original file (20090012186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a copy a self-authored statement, dated 7 July 2009; a copy of his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel), dated 16 December 2006; a copy of U.S. Army Human Resources Command (USAHRC), St. Louis, MO, Orders T-06-738528, dated 18 June 2007; a copy of his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 5 October 2007; a copy of USAHRC, St. Louis, Orders A-11-722916, dated 27 November 2007; and a copy of a memorandum from the Office of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017418C070206

    Original file (20050017418C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that on 18 August 2004 the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) concluded that his promotion eligibility date (PED) for MAJ was 2 November 2003. The applicant further states, in effect, that he subsequently received promotion orders to the grade of rank of MAJ, with an effective date and DOR of 27 December 2004. The USA HRC advisory official states that the applicant was issued a select memorandum, dated 1 November 2005, indicating a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015869

    Original file (20130015869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). She provided copies of her baccalaureate degree from 21 October 2005 and non-rated periods from May 2004 to October 2005 and February 2006 to February 2008 that she presented to her unit for the Department of the Army (DA) FY 2010 CPT promotion board. Since making their FY 2012 DA CPT promotion list, she has been promoted to CPT as of 15 February 2012, per Order Number B-03-201480, dated 01 March 2012.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020317

    Original file (20090020317.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was appointed as a 1LT, Chaplain Corps, with a DOR of 25 August 1994. Once he is appointed in the USAR in the correct grade, USAHRC officials should determine the earliest dates he would have qualified for consideration for promotion to MAJ and LTC and, if necessary, have his records be considered for promotion by a special selection board to MAJ and LTC, under the appropriate year(s) criteria, as soon as he became eligible for such promotions based on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002949

    Original file (20070002949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was eligible for promotion 24 months from his initial appointment date of 23 April 2004; however, he was not promoted at that time due to his transfer from the Army National Guard (ARNG) to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). The evidence of record also shows that the applicant transferred from the ARNG to the USAR, in the grade of 2LT, effective 12 April 2006, and was considered and selected for promotion to 1LT by the 2006 Administrative Selection Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005307

    Original file (20090005307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form further shows that during the period from 27 December 2006 through 31 May 2007, the applicant was in an inactive status and thus received zero retirement points. Correcting his records to show he remained in the IRR, and thus voiding his service in the Standby Reserve (Inactive List), would readjust his last few retirement years to 13 May 2006 through 12 May 2007 (during which his 21 additional points would added), 13 May 2007 through 12 May 2008 (which would still be a qualifying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014541

    Original file (20080014541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of a 27 October 1997 memorandum for record; his 1999 and 2007 OERs; a 30 June 2000 Army National Guard (ARNG) memorandum; United States Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), Missouri, Orders M-10-504460; 10 April 2006 deployment orders; a 2007 Physical Profile; a March 2007 Bronze Star Medal certificate; and several electronic mail communications. With his rebuttal to an advisory opinion, the applicant also provides copies of an excerpt from a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004612

    Original file (20090004612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s request for reinstatement as an officer in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) was considered and denied by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) on 4 May 2006. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant met with The Adjutant General to discuss his discharge and that The Adjutant General allowed him to later enlist as an enlisted Soldier. The evidence of records further shows that, while in the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010983

    Original file (20070010983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief further stated that The New Jersey Adjutant General approved the Federal recognition examining board proceedings for the officer to be initially appointed effective 23 July 2004 and the officer executed his oath of office, also on 23 July 2004. The Chief also stated that he could not make a recommendation regarding the applicant's promotion to 1LT since the applicant was transferred to the USAR and that in accordance with Army Regulation 135-188 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers...