Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014961
Original file (20080014961.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       17 March 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014961 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct middle name. 

2.  The applicant states that his middle name is incorrectly entered on his 
DD Form 214 and he needs it corrected so as to prevent an incorrect name on his tombstone.   He contends that at the time of his separation he was told his separation would be delayed if he insisted on having the DD Form 214 corrected.  He wanted out.   

3.  The applicant provides, in support of this application, copies of his DD Form 214, birth certificate and marriage certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 2 September 1969, the applicant was inducted into the Army under the name of A___ Stanford A___.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  On     14 May 1970, his MOS was changed to 71B (Clerk Typist).   

3.  The applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) contains documents that show the following information:

	a.  a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) shows his middle name as Stanford;

	b.  a U. S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) Form 191 (Statement of Law Violations) shows his middle name as Stanford;

	c.  a USAREC Form 180 (Acknowledgment of Service Obligation) shows his middle name as Stanford;

	d.  Special Orders Number 169, Armed Forces Entrance and Examining Station, Albany, New York, show his middle initial as "S";

	e.  a DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card) was typed showing a middle name of "Michael," but the applicant signed with a middle initial of "S";

	f.  a DD Form 1584 (National Agency Check Request) shows his middle name as Stanford;

	g.  a VA Form 29-8286 (Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election) shows his middle name as Stanford; and

	h.  his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his middle initial was corrected from "M" to "S."

4.  On 7 April 1971, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve.  He had attained the rank of specialist five, pay grade E-5, and had completed 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of creditable active duty service.  

5.  Item 1 (Last, First, and Middle Name) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his middle name as "Michael."  He signed the form in Item 32 using "Michael" as his middle name.


6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established standardized procedures for preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214.  The regulation, as in effect at the time, stated to enter the last name, first name, and full middle name or names, if any.  Subsequent versions of this regulation state, in effect, to compare the individual's name with the enlistment contract and personnel record. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his middle name is incorrect on his DD Form 214 and that his separation would have been delayed if he had insisted at the time to have it corrected.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant entered military service using a middle name of Stanford and that he used this middle name consistently throughout his service.  

3.  The evidence further shows that he signed his DD Form 214 using a middle name of "Michael," in accordance with how the form was prepared.  It is reasonable to presume that he did this so as to facilitate his separation on that day.

4.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes.  In this case, the applicant's request should be granted.  He enlisted and served using a middle name of Stanford and the record should show his correct name.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ____X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected, to include the individual's DD Form 214, by showing his middle name is Stanford.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014961



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014961



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002080

    Original file (20150002080.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show his last name as conferred upon his naturalization as a United States citizen. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant together with the evidence of record, the applicant offers insufficient evidence to warrant a change of the name in his official military service records. Therefore, in this case, it would be appropriate to issue a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) adding his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013259

    Original file (20130013259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of every document contained in the applicant's military personnel record shows he served under the name of "L____ A___ M_______," and with an SSN that is completely different from the SSN he requests to be documented in his record. Although the applicant requests to correct his DD Form 214 to show his name and SSN as it is listed on his Social Security Card, all of the documents in his military service record show he served in the Army using the name and SSN listed on his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004924

    Original file (20140004924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his birth record shows his full name is "Walter Ronald Gxxxxxxx." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show the first and middle names listed on his DD Form 214 were not in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018411

    Original file (20090018411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). When the applicant was honorably separated on 16 April 1971, his DD Form 214 listed "Michael" as his middle name. While the applicant's evidence shows he never had a legal middle name, the evidence of record shows he enlisted and served using the middle name of "Michael" throughout his entire period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006920

    Original file (20120006920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The applicant contends that the name recorded on his DD Form 214 should be corrected because his name was legally changed prior to his release from active duty. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003475

    Original file (20130003475.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) by reversing his first and middle names. The evidence of record shows the applicant appropriately recorded his first and middle name as Ray Michael when he first entered military service as verified by his birth certificate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055121C070420

    Original file (2001055121C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 54 was the fact that in the transcripts the board stated that she never denied being a homosexual. However, the Board also notes that according to the transcripts CSM M___ testified that PFC A___ was not the applicant’s subordinate. The Board concludes that there was no evidence at the time of the board hearing and she has provided no evidence now to overcome the conclusion that she did make and sign the 6 May 1982 Sworn Statement in which she admitted to homosexual activity.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004825

    Original file (20130004825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. There is no documentary evidence showing a recruiter insisted that he use a name other than the name he claims is his birth and legal name. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000261

    Original file (20100000261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his record to show his name is J____ R_______ M_____. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted under the name J____ E___ R_______, later he enlisted in the Regular Army under this name, and used the signature J____ E___ R_______ or J____ E. R_______ consistently throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021484

    Original file (20140021484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 1 (Name (Last, first, middle)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the first and middle names "Michael Scott" instead of "Scott Michael." The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the RA, USAR, and WAARNG using the first and middle names "Scott Michael." There is no evidence of record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to show the first and middle names listed on his DD Form 214 were...