IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 December 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014874
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that although it was due, he was never awarded the AGCM.
3. The applicant provides his separation document (DD Form 214) in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 11 August 1970, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11E (Armor Crewman).
3. The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he was promoted to specialist four (SP4) on 5 February 1971, and that this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he earned "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments.
4. The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have prohibited him from receiving the AGCM.
5. On 29 March 1972, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of SP4 after completing 1 year, 7 months, and 19 days of active military service.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. Chapter 4 prescribes the policy for award of the AGCM. It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years, except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service, in which case a period of more than 1 year is a qualifying period. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that he should have been awarded the AGCM was carefully considered and found to have merit.
2. The applicant's record confirms that he received "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments. Further, the record is void of derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the AGCM. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 11 August 1970 through 29 March 1972.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 11 August 1970 through 29 March 1972; and by providing him a correction to his separation document that includes this award.
______x_______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080014874
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080014874
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014924
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014924 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In this case, the applicants record contains orders that awarded him the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 21 March 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 3 November 1969 through 7...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008434
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 OCTOBER 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008434 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in C Company, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry Regiment during the period 15 January through 2 November 1971, and that his unit was awarded the VUA for a period (23 September through 25 October 1971) during the applicant's tenure of assignment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000619
The applicants Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 12 January 1970 through 6 December 1970. The applicant provides a PH Certificate which shows that on 20 July 1970, the 91st Evacuation Hospital awarded him the PH for wounds he received in action on 19 July 1970. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add his award of the PH to his record and separation document at this time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20090001882
The applicant states, in effect, that his ARCOM was mailed to him after he was separated from the Army and it is not included in the list of awards contained on his DD Form 214. Although an award would not normally be added to the DD Form 214 absent orders or a records entry confirming entitlement, the certificate and citation provided by the applicant seem to be valid and show the award was approved, on 25 June 1970, more than 60 days subsequent to the applicant's REFRAD. As a result, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017109C071029
Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit while serving in the RVN.
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012592
The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 8 January 1971 through 19 December 1971. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that wound for which the award is being was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002357
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 22 July 1970 through 24 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009905
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100009905 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Armys awards policy. Therefore, based on the recommendation of his unit commander contained in the DA Form 137 in his record, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 23 October 1968 through 22 October 1971 and to add it to his record and DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000962
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 12 June 1969 through 14 March 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019457
The evidence of record confirms the applicant was wounded in action when he sustained fragment wounds to his back in the RVN on 27 February 1971, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 27 February 1971 and by adding this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....