Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014653
Original file (20080014653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       18 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014653 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests: 

	a.  correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (6th Award) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award); and

	b.  award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM)–SA.

2.  The applicant states that he wants his DD Form 214 corrected so that when he wears his uniform he will not be in violation of the Stolen Valor Act.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and copies of his AAM orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 6 June 1974 through
31 December 1994 until he retired with sufficient years of service for retirement.  A review of his official records show that his first period of active duty from
6 June 1974 – 21 July 1976 was covered by a separate DD Form 214.  This DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) during this period of service. 

3.  The official records contain permanent orders showing the applicant was awarded subsequent awards of the AGCM as follows:  

		6 June 1977 – 5 June 1980 	2nd Award
		6 June 1980 – 5 June 1983	3rd Award
		6 June 1983 – 5 June 1986	4th Award
		6 June 1986 	  5 June 1989	5th Award

4.  There is no evidence of a 6th award of the AGCM; however, he would have been eligible for the 6th award covering the period 6 June 1989 – 5 June 1992. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, there is no evidence in the applicant's records showing that he would have been disqualified from receiving it and he retired in good standing. 

5.  The applicant provided copies of his Permanent Orders showing that he was awarded the AAM (5th Award).  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the AAM (4th Award).

6.  The applicant served in Southwest Asia from 24 January through 4 May 1991. His DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (without country of award designation).

7.  The KLM awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) was approved on 3 January 1992 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in the Persian Gulf War between 17 January 1991 and 28 February 1991.

8.  The KLM awarded by the Government of Kuwait (KLM-K) was approved on
9 November 1995 and is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in the Persian Gulf War between 2 August 1990 and
31 August 1993.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded the AGCM (5th Award) through the period 5 June 1989.  He would have been eligible for the 6th award of the AGCM on 5 June 1992.  However, there is no evidence in his official records showing he was awarded the AGCM (6th Award).  There is no evidence to show he would have been disqualified from receiving this award and he retired in good standing.  Therefore, the applicant should be awarded the AGCM (6th Award) covering the period 6 June 1989 – 5 June 1992 and he should have his records corrected to show this award.

2.  Permanent Orders awarded the applicant the AAM (5th Award).  Therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show this award.

3.  The applicant had a qualifying period of service in SWA for award of the 
KLM-SA and KLM–K.  His DD Form 214 shows that he received the KLM without a country designation.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show he was already awarded the KLM–SA, and to show he is also entitled for award of the KLM–K. 

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: 

	a.  awarding the AGCM (6th Award) for the period 6 June 1989 – 5 June 1992 and correcting the record to show this award;




	b.  deleting the "AAM (4th Award)" and adding the "AAM (5th Award)" to the applicant's DD Form 214; and

	c.  deleting the "KLM" and adding the "KLM-SA" and "KLM-K" to the applicant's DD Form 214.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014653



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014653



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058624C070421

    Original file (2001058624C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant was recommended for award of the AAM OLC#1. Evidence of record shows that applicant served in Southwest Asia during the qualifying periods for which award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) and the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) are authorized. Evidence of record shows, and the applicant has confirmed, that he was awarded two Army Achievement Medals while in the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020030

    Original file (20090020030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (4th Award), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (6th Award), "Kuwait Liberation Award, Saudi Arabia Award" (accepted as a request for the Kuwait Liberation Medal - Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) and Kuwait Liberation Medal - Government of Kuwait (KLM-KU), Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) with three bronze service stars, and a unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021828

    Original file (20130021828.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his foreign service, his deployment and awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), and Kuwait Liberation Medal. The applicant states he deployed to the Gulf War during 19900819 – 19910426 and his DD Form 214 does not reflect his foreign service, deployment, or awards of the AAM, SWASM, and Kuwait Liberation Medal. His DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010575

    Original file (20080010575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, dated 23 December 2004, be corrected to reflect his attendance at the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC), his award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and all other awards that were reflected on his DD Form 214, dated 20 June 2001. The applicant provides copies of his award of the MSM, his completion of the ANCOC, and of his DD Forms 214. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011193

    Original file (20140011193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in the rank and pay grade of SPC/ E-4 and he was awarded the AAM; however, they were not recorded on his DD Form 214 when he separated from active duty. In review, the applicant’s records do not have evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his first term of enlisted service was honorable. Accordingly, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period of 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003771

    Original file (20130003771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his awards of the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (second award), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with four oak leaf clusters (OLCs), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) with four OLCs, Italian Parachutist Badge, and completion of the psychological operations specialist course and Basic Haitian Creole course. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not properly reflect his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001070

    Original file (20080001070.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Army Achievement Medal and the Kuwait Liberation Medal awarded by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA). The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the AAM and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019064

    Original file (20140019064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM for service during the period 3 May 1990 to 23 April 1992 but the award is not shown on his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 does not show the ARCOM or the AGCM as authorized awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the SWASM with two bronze service stars and KLM from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 October 1989...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005877

    Original file (20110005877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he was awarded the CIB while serving in Operation Desert Storm and it was not entered on his DD Form 214. Accordingly, it should be awarded at this time and added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Adding his awards of the CIB and AGCM to his DD Form 214 * Deleting his award of the Kuwait Liberation Medal from his DD Form 214 * Adding the award of the KLM-SA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018315

    Original file (20130018315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018315 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM), and the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a.