Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014625
Original file (20080014625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  30 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014625 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD).   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the BCD should be vacated or set aside.  He adds that it has been almost 8 years since his conviction, and he would like to continue his life by excelling in college.

3.  The applicant does not provide documents in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's available record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 3 June 1997, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).  His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition.

3.  On 16 September 1998, the applicant was convicted by a General Court-Martial of one specification of conspiring to commit a burglary; one specification of the wrong use of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); one specification of the wrongful use of marijuana; four specifications of larceny; three specifications of making bad checks; one specification of unlawfully breaking and entering a barracks room; one specification of unlawfully influencing a witness by means of bribery; and one specification of breaking restriction.  The applicant was sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 5 years, forfeitures of all pay and allowances and to be discharged from the service with a BCD.  On 24 February 1999, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence for a BCD, total forfeitures of all pay and allowances and confinement for 30 month.  The findings and sentence were affirmed and executed.  

4.  On 27 June 2003, the applicant was discharged with a BCD after completing a total of 1 year, 2 months, and 19 days of creditable active military service.

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 provides the policies and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or a BCD.  It stipulates, in pertinent part, that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial, and that the appellate review must be completed and affirmed before the sentence is ordered duly executed.

6.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be vacated or set aside because of time was carefully considered and found to be without merit.  There is no evidence and the applicant has not presented any evidence to support granting the requested relief.  

2.  The evidence of record reveals no error or injustice related to the applicant’s court-martial and/or his subsequent discharge.  By law, any redress by this Board 
of the finality of a court-martial conviction under the UCMJ, is prohibited.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.

3.  His record documents no acts of valor, significant achievement, or service warranting special recognition, and there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support clemency in this case.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014625



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014625



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002634

    Original file (20090002634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier petition for an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. In his letter, the applicant states that he has already submitted an application, but was wondering about the review process for his military conviction in order to upgrade his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013016

    Original file (20090013016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 15 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013016 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021934

    Original file (20100021934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) issued at the time shows he was discharged on 2 September 1969 with a DD as a result of a court-martial. The review determined the DD was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007173

    Original file (20140007173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The convening authority approved the sentence and the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence on 13 December 1962. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009329

    Original file (20090009329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD) 2. The applicant provides no documentation in support of his application.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021104

    Original file (20110021104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. GCM Order Number 50, Headquarters, 8th Infantry Division, dated 24 August 1989, shows the sentence adjudged on 17 April 1989 was approved by the GCM convening authority. Based on the gravity of the offenses resulting in his court-martial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011660

    Original file (20090011660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 17 September 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after careful consideration of the applicant's military records and all other available evidence determined that he had been properly and equitably discharged, and it voted to deny his request for a change to the characterization of his service and/or to the reason of his separation. There is no available evidence in his military record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004311

    Original file (20140004311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 December 1980, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, as a result of a court-martial with a BCD. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by two courts-martial, the last of which ordered his BCD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001189

    Original file (20090001189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 201 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Germany from 25 January 1978 through 9 March 1979, and earned no individual awards or decorations during his active duty tenure. In accordance with Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002386

    Original file (20070002386.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070002386 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 18 June 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board reviewed the applicant's military records and all other available evidence and denied the applicant's request for a change in the character and reason of discharge. ...