Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014449
Original file (20080014449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  24 November 208

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014449 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board's denial of her late husband's request to upgrade his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD).

2.  The applicant states there were serious mitigating circumstances which led to the discharge of her husband, the Former Service Member (FSM).

3.  The applicant provides her late husband's death certificate, their marriage certificate, and six enclosures which she lists in a table of contents in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the FSM's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070006135 on 16 October 2007.

2.  In the Board's first consideration of the FSM's case, the Board found that the FSM had accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice on two occasions, and was convicted by a special court-martial.  





Based on the court-martial conviction, the FSM was given a BCD on 3 November 1970.  The Board concluded that there was no available independent evidence showing that the FSM was molested or raped while on active duty, and that trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.

3.  The letter the applicant submitted was a continuation of the FSM's request for a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability rating.  In that letter the applicant tells of how both she and the FSM had been raped when they were young, her as a teenager and the FSM when he was in the stockade, and how the trauma of the rapes adversely affected their lives.

4.  The applicant submits two letters from a psychiatrist to the VA dated 10 June 2008 in which the psychiatrist stated that he had been treating the FSM since 25 April 2002 and that the FSM reported symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) due to being gang-raped while in the stockade on active duty.  The psychiatrist also diagnosed the FSM with several other medical conditions.  The psychiatrist attested to the believability of the FSM and outlined the PTSD symptoms reported by the applicant.  The psychiatrist also stated that the FSM was in a 12-step recovery program for alcoholism.

5.  The applicant also submitted a flier outlining what military sexual trauma is, a flier showing where to obtain military sexual trauma services, and a letter describing what an initial enlistee is subjected to in training.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant has submitted documents showing that the FSM reported being raped while on active duty, that admission was 38 years after his discharge.

2.  Without evidence to show that the FSM reported being raped while on active duty or, possibly, immediately following his discharge, there is insufficient evidence to verify he was raped while on active duty.

3.  However, whether or not the FSM was raped is not an issue in whether his discharge was appropriate.  The FSM reported being raped while in the stockade.  As such, it must be presumed that he had already been sentenced to a BCD.  If the rape occurred after he had been sentenced to a BCD, it cannot be said that the rape caused the FSM's misconduct.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR AR20070006135 dated 16 October 2007.



      ________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014449



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014449



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00300

    Original file (BC-2005-00300.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the mental health records are not available for review (only limited entries in the main service medical record), the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) narrative summary dated June 28, 2002 provides the most complete psychiatric summary available in the case file while she was on active duty. Had the Physical Evaluation Board concluded that service aggravated her condition, rating deductions for existing prior to service symptoms and for non-compensable personality...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012141

    Original file (20140012141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests an upgrade of the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to honorable. On 3 September 2014 in view of the foregoing information, the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations, and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019055

    Original file (20140019055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his two earlier requests: * to have his name removed from a Criminal Investigation Division (CID) report of investigation (ROI) * to upgrade his under other than honorable conditions discharge 2. In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015434

    Original file (20140015434.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge. In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511136C070209

    Original file (9511136C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: She was discharged through administrative channels, and the Army Discharge Review Board agrees that if her condition had been properly diagnosed, she would have received a physical disability retirement or separation. That official stated that the applicant had received extensive mental health care during her active duty service, and that her difficulties were attributed to adjustment disorders and various combinations of personality features and personality disorder, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021156

    Original file (20140021156.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 September 2014 in view of the foregoing information, the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations, and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members administratively discharged UOTHC and who have been diagnosed with PTSD by a competent mental health professional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005682

    Original file (20140005682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings * Health record documents * Personal/Military Data Sheet * Internet articles pertaining to PTSD, sexual violence, sexual assault, and rape * Applicant's "Suicidal" Letter * Internet DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 11 February 2003 * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) * VA Problem List CONSIDERATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010486

    Original file (20140010486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    United States Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Ord, California, Special Court-Martial Orders Number 124, dated 19 May 1971, noted that only so much of the approved sentences as provided for a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, forfeiture of $70.00 pay per months for 6 months and reduction to pay grade E-1 had been affirmed. In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004687

    Original file (20130004687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 January 1961, the FSM's immediate commander requested the FSM be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-89 (Personnel Separations – Homosexuality). However, his records contain a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations) for unfitness with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, his record contains a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 29...

  • CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2004-177

    Original file (2004-177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated May 5, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant asked the Board to correct her military record to show that she was discharged from the Coast Guard by reason of physical disability with a 100% disability rating due to post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), rather than having been discharged by reason of unsuitability due to personality disorder. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Records On January 21, 1994, approximately...