Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014425
Original file (20080014425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  11 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014425 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he suffered a shrapnel wound to his left knee.  The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has recently conceded this fact, awarding him a zero percent disability rating on 29 August 2007.

3.  The applicant provides three DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), one for the period ending 22 February 1967, one for the period ending 20 February 1970, and one for the period ending 27 January 1976; and a VA Rating Decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 15 February 1967.  He was honorably discharged on 22 February 1967 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 February 1967.  He completed basic training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 57H (Cargo Handler) in June 1967.  He was later awarded military occupational specialty 64A (Light Vehicle Driver).

3.  The applicant served in Vietnam from on or about 9 July 1967 through on or about 9 July 1968.

4.  The applicant's records were apparently lost upon his departure from Vietnam.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) was reconstructed on 21 August 1968.  Item 40 (Wounds) does not show he was wounded in action.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 20 February 1970.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 February 1970 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960).

6.  The applicant subsequently served in the Regular Army from 1 December 1975 until he was honorably discharged on 27 January 1976.

7.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Republic of Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8.  The applicant provided a VA Rating Decision, dated 14 March 2008.  The VA awarded him service connection for a shell fragment wound to the left knee with a zero percent disability rating.  The Rating Decision states, in pertinent part, "Service Treatment Records from February 15, 1967 through October 30, 1975 are negative for treatment or diagnosis of the injury to the left knee.  Records note a one time complaint of knee pain with no diagnosis."

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is acknowledged that the VA has awarded the applicant service connection for a shell fragment wound to his left knee.  However, the Rating Decision also indicated that his service treatment records from 15 February 1967 through 30 October 1975 are negative for treatment or diagnosis of the injury to his left knee.  The VA may award service connection for any injury or disease incurred during active military service.  The injury or disease need not be combat-related.

2.  Regrettably, since there are no service records to corroborate the cause of the applicant's injury or to confirm that he was treated for a wound resulting from hostile action, the Rating Decision is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _________XXX__________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014425



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014425



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001087

    Original file (20120001087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods ending 29 January 1967, 9 January 1971, and 19 November 1975 * VA application for compensation or pension * VA medical records * VA rating decision * Standard Form (SF) 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 24 July 1975 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026430

    Original file (20100026430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No combat injuries or wounds are recorded on his medical records; however, an entry "scar to left leg" was entered on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination). In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 is not available for review, his service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his record is void of any official Army telegrams or Western Union telegrams, and there is no conclusive evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607908C070209

    Original file (9607908C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to reflect that he was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries suffered in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as the result of hostile action. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries sustained on 18 December 1967...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011303

    Original file (20080011303.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart; that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 September 1974 be corrected to show all his awards to include the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and foreign unit awards such as the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation; and that item 19 (Indochina or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001830C070208

    Original file (20040001830C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    That form, however, does not show award of the Purple Heart nor does it show that he was wounded in action. Notwithstanding the information contained in the 2004 VA rating decision, and the information that he entered on his 1976 report of medical history, there is no medical evidence to show that the applicant was wounded in action or treated for such a wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015678

    Original file (20090015678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel service records awarding him the Purple Heart. The applicant's military medical records are not available for the Board to review. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007900

    Original file (20090007900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, the available evidence is insufficient to confirm he sustained a wound as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005384

    Original file (20140005384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Email exchanged with HRC officials * Multiple applications and responses from this Board * Reconstructed DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated July 2012 * Multiple letters from HRC * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 7 October 2006 * Disability retirement orders, dated 13 November 2013 * Enlisted Record Brief and DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) * Reconstructed DA Forms 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017857

    Original file (20130017857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was combat wounded in Vietnam * during a firefight in the jungles of Vietnam he sustained shrapnel wounds in the left forearm and left side of his head 3. The Purple Heart requires evidence to verify: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in...