Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014411
Original file (20080014411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  25 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014411 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 9 (Command to Which Transferred) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states that he was discharged from his command on 23 November 2006.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Orders 075-1016, dated 16 March 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 May 2003.  At the completion of basic training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 92F (petroleum supply specialist).  His highest grade attained was specialist.  He served in Iraq from 9 February 2004 through 9 February 2005.

2.  Department of the Army, Kitzingen Transition Center, Orders 053-003, dated 22 February 2006, show the applicant was released from active duty on 30 April 2006 and was assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following date.  

3.  Department of the Army, Kitzingen Transition Center, Orders 054-006, dated 23 February 2006, amended Orders 053-003, dated 22 February 2006, to show the applicant was assigned to Company C, 536th Support Battalion, La Marque, Texas instead of the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).
4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 30 April 2006.  Item 9 on his DD Form 214 shows he was transferred to Company C, 536th Support Battalion, La Marque, Texas.  

5.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 1 May 2006.

6.  Texas Military Forces, Army National Guard, Adjutant General's Department, Austin, Texas Orders 075-1016, dated 16 March 2007, show the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 23 November 2006.  These orders show he was assigned to Company C, 536th Support Battalion, La Marque, Texas at the time of his discharge.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  In pertinent part, it directs that the command to which the Soldier will be transferred is entered in item 9 of the DD Form 214 based on Table 2-1 of Army Regulation 635-5.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 May 2003 and was released from active duty on 30 April 2006 at the completion of his required active service.  

2.  Orders were published in February 2006 which show the applicant was initially transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 1 May 2006, the date after he was released from active duty.  However, these orders were later amended to show he would be assigned to Company C, 536th Support Battalion, La Marque, Texas.  

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects his unit, Company C, 536th Support Battalion, La Marque, Texas, in item 9.  The applicant was not discharged until November 2006, which is outside the period covered by the DD Form 214.

4.  There appears to be no error or injustice in this case regarding the unit to which the applicant was transferred.  Therefore, there is no basis for amending item 9 on his DD Form 214.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014411



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014411



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012604

    Original file (20090012604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that his mobilization orders were revoked on 2 October 2008, he was given a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report) that indicates he did not complete any service, and he was told that he was not going to be paid for the period 1 to 22 October 2008 or authorized any travel pay. e. USAHRC, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders C-04-807761, dated 23 April 2008, show the applicant was reassigned from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to the 421st Quartermaster Company (Airdrop Support), Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004200

    Original file (20090004200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Even though the Board will not take action to take away medals that were already awarded, no matter the mistaken conditions under which the medal was awarded, it will also not amend separation documents to add awards to which an applicant is not entitled; therefore, correction of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an ending date of 16 November 2006 to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) will not be discussed further in these Proceedings. Based on the evidence in this case,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007955

    Original file (20090007955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states he is authorized award of the Afghanistan Campaign Medal based on his deployment to Afghanistan with the 2nd Battalion, 187th Infantry in January 2002. It states that awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22 will be entered on the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001730

    Original file (20120001730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty on 7 January 2005, she was honorably REFRAD on 6 February 2006 based on completion of required active service. The evidence of record also shows the applicant had continuous service as a member of the USAR from 31 January 2000 through the date she was REFRAD on 6 February 2006. b. Thus, records show the applicant's HOR was incorrectly recorded on her orders when she was ordered to active duty in support of OEF on 7 January 2005.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020425

    Original file (20110020425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his son under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve Component service. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013072

    Original file (20100013072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of 19D (Calvary Scout) as a secondary military occupational specialty (MOS) and to add the following awards: * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) * Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) * Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOTSM) * Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) 2. The applicant states: a. he is a former member of the Regular Army, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000079

    Original file (20070000079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070000079 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in his military personnel records to show he was considered or selected for promotion to SFC/E-7 or that he attained promotion list status. The evidence shows that the applicant was serving in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016736

    Original file (20090016736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence in his records that show he was awarded MOS 25F or that he was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service. He then completed 6 months and 10 days when he was ordered to active duty on 1 August 2006 (the DD Form 215 adjusted this date to 28 July 2006) and he was released from active duty on 7 February 2007. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011145

    Original file (20140011145.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), twice awarded the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and to add omitted military training. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 September 1992 to show in: * item 13 - * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000278

    Original file (20110000278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her date of discharge as 23 September 1993, her characterization of service as honorable, and her rank as specialist, pay grade E-4. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR and was ordered to ADT in July 1990. Therefore, her rank as recorded on her DD Form 214 appears to be correct.