Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014337
Original file (20080014337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        06 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014337 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was wounded in April of 1968 and that he got medical treatments for his wounds in Red Beach, Danang.  He states that his DD Form 214 does not reflect anything about a Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application, a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army in Anderson, South Carolina, on 12 July 1966.  He was honorably discharged on 15 July 1966, for the purpose of enlistment in the Army.  

3.  Accordingly, he enlisted in the Army on 16 July 1966 and he successfully completed his training as an aircraft engineer repairman.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 26 May 1967 and he was assigned to Company A, 15th TC Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) on 3 July 1967.

4.  A review of the applicant’s records does not show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant returned to the Continental United States on 29 June 1968 and he was assigned to Company B, 724th Maintenance Battalion, at Fort Riley, Kansas.

6.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 15 July 1969, at the expiration of his term of service and he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve to complete his Reserve obligation.  The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal w/Device 1960, the Vietnam Service Medal, two Overseas Service Bars, the Army Commendation Medal and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge w/Rifle Bar.

7.  A review of the Vietnam Casualty Roster does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the available records does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

2.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.


3.  The applicant has provided no evidence to support his contention that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in April 1968 and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that what the Army did in his case was correct.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _XXX   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014337



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014337



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019192

    Original file (20090019192.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. It appears it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of service and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020125

    Original file (20100020125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service records awarding him the Purple Heart. Therefore, the applicant should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 9 February 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam. Adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * Purple Heart * Valorous Unit Award * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (two awards) * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022913

    Original file (20100022913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no general orders in the applicant's service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, but his name appears on the Vietnam casualty roster. It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028762

    Original file (20100028762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, based on the evidence provided, he is entitled to the second award of the Purple Heart. The evidence shows he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 23 October 1967; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the VSM; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart (2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006197

    Original file (20080006197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the awards of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 30 April 1968, the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation, and one silver service star to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010523

    Original file (20090010523.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026097

    Original file (20100026097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 6 June 1966 to 4 June 1967, and from 14 February through 15 May 1968. This document does not show that the applicant was wounded in action. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that there was sufficient evidence to show the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile fire action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022916

    Original file (20100022916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards which are not listed on his records. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The evidence of record shows he was awarded various awards throughout his military service which are not shown on his retirement DD Form 214 for the period ending on 31 October 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105881C070208

    Original file (2004105881C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 November 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004105881 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Therefore, these statements by themselves are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart, particularly when other evidence of record shows he was not wounded as a result of hostile action. Therefore, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000917

    Original file (20090000917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 June 1966. The Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by Department of the Army General Order Number 8,...