Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014165
Original file (20080014165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	
		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014165 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, change of the effective date and date of rank for her promotion to lieutenant colonel from 10 June 2008 to 17 March 2008.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that her erroneous promotion effective date has resulted in a loss of pay entitlements since she was activated on 19 May 2008 for a period of 19 days.  She also states, in effect, that when her activation orders showed her rank as major rather than lieutenant colonel, she realized that her promotion had not been properly processed and immediately began to seek a resolution.  The applicant contends that someone at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command informed her that the effective date of her promotion would be retroactive to 17 March 2008.  However, when the promotion orders were issued on 11 June 2008, the effective date of promotion was 10 June 2008.

3.  The applicant provides copies of two DA Forms 4651 (Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment) in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that she was appointed in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) as a second lieutenant (2LT)/pay grade O-1, effective 14 May 1989.  Upon completion of her initial entry training the applicant was awarded specialty 91D (Ordnance Munition Materiel Management).  At a later date, she attended training and was awarded her current specialty of 38A (Civil Affairs).  During her career, the applicant has progressed through the commissioned officer ranks and currently holds the rank of lieutenant colonel/pay grade O-5.  The applicant is currently assigned to the U.S. Army Element of Headquarters, U.S. Pacific Command.

2.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, Orders
C-10-424764, dated 27 October 2004, assigned the applicant to serve as Contingency Plans Officer in the U.S. Army Element of Headquarters, U.S. Pacific Command effective 22 October 2004.  In this capacity, she occupied the position, paragraph 544, line 02A, which was coded as a major's billet on the unit's manning document.

3.  The applicant was considered and selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the 2008 Reserve Components Selection Board.

4.  The applicant provides a DA Form 4651, initiated in March 2008, showing that she requested to be transferred from her current position to a Plans Officer position within the same unit for the purpose of being promoted to lieutenant colonel effective 17 March 2008.  In this capacity, she would occupy the position, paragraph 530, line 19, which was coded as a lieutenant colonel's billet on the unit's manning document.  The applicant signed this form on 31 March 2008.  Item 5j (Typed Name, Grade, Title and Signature of Gaining Unit Commander) of this form is blank.  Item 6d (Typed Name, Grade, Title and Signature of Losing Unit Commander) of this form is also blank.  

5.  The applicant also provides a copy of the aforementioned DA Form 4651, which was endorsed by the unit's Reserve Coordinator on 1 April 2008.  This form contains conflicting handwritten entries.  Item 5 (Request Assignment / Attachment / Transfer to:) of the form was modified to indicate the applicant should be transferred to the position, paragraph 544, line 02A [which has already been established as her then current position and a major's billet on the unit's manning document].  Item 8 (Remarks) of this form was modified to indicate the applicant should be transferred to serve as a Plans Officer in the position, paragraph 531, line 01, which was coded as a lieutenant colonel's billet on the unit's manning document.

6.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Orders C-06-811175, dated 10 June 2008, released the applicant from duty as Contingency Plans Officer in the position, paragraph 544, line 02A and assigned her for duty as Plans Officer in the position, paragraph 530, line 01, which was coded as a lieutenant colonel's billet on the unit's manning document, effective 10 June 2008.

7.  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Orders B-06-803807, dated 11 June 2008, promoted the applicant to the rank of lieutenant colonel with an effective date and date of rank of 10 June 2008.

8.  In an advisory opinion, dated 21 November 2008, obtained from the Chief, Special Actions, DA Promotions Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, recommended disapproval of the applicant's request.  The advisory official stated that the applicant's date of rank was based on the verified date of assignment to a higher graded position.  He noted that the applicant's copy of the DA Form 4651, dated 10 March 2008 was incomplete.  The official also noted that Item 5 of the DA Form 4651 that was signed on 1 April 2008, indicates the applicant was assigned to a major's position.  The official further stated that if the applicant provides completed and correct documentation to verify she was assigned to a higher graded position prior to 10 June 2008, her request for an earlier date of rank would be reevaluated.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for acknowledgement and/or rebuttal on
18 December 2008, but she did not to respond.

9.  Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve - Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prescribes the policies and procedures for the promotion of Reserve officers.  Paragraph 4-21d of the regulation specifies that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than the date the board is approved or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade.  When the board approval or, if required, Senate confirmation is before assignment to the position in the higher grade, the effective date and the date of promotion will be the date of assignment to the higher graded position.  If the officer voluntarily delays promotion and is later assigned to a higher graded position during the period of delay, the effective date and date of promotion become the date of assignment to the higher graded position.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the effective date and date of rank for her promotion to lieutenant colonel should be changed from 10 June 2008 to 17 March 2008 was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant was not assigned to a lieutenant colonel's position until 10 June 2008.  Therefore, she was also not eligible for promotion to lieutenant colonel prior to 10 June 2008.  Her date of rank and promotion effective date for lieutenant colonel are proper and she has not shown otherwise.
3.  The applicant was promoted to lieutenant colonel in accordance with applicable regulation.  The evidence does not show, and the applicant has not satisfactorily shown, that she was unjustly denied an earlier date of rank for lieutenant colonel.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x_____  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014165



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014165



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008232

    Original file (20130008232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His DOR to O-5 should reflect the original date he was assigned to his current position * He was assigned to paragraph 012A and line 07 on 12 October 2012 * His current DOR reflects an erroneous date of assignment of 17 January 2013 * The Unit Manning Report (UMR) should have reflected the assignment date of his orders, which were signed by his company commander indicating acceptance of his transfer to the Reserve * He was moved out of the paragraph and line from 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021131

    Original file (20090021131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). He was promoted with a date of rank of 18 August 2009 and an effective date of 19 August 2009. e. In accordance with information received from LTC E__ S__, who was Chief, DA Secretariat-STL during the board process, the Officer Management Branch had three valid higher graded positions they could have used to assign the applicant to when publishing his assignment orders. However, evidence indicates that once it was known he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014720

    Original file (20090014720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He claims under the policy contained in Office of the Chief, Army Reserve (OCAR) Memorandum, dated 18 April 2008, which was in effect at the time, having made the LTC promotion list as a mobilized officer serving on active duty, he should have been promoted to LTC upon being matched against a position of like rank and grade. This official indicated the applicant was considered for promotion by the FY07 LTC RCSB that convened on 11 September 2007, and was promoted to LTC in orders, dated 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014464

    Original file (20080014464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to her date of rank for major from 11 July 2004 to 25 May 2004. The applicant states, in effect, that she was in a mobilized status when the 2004 Army Medical Department (AMEDD) board results were released and that should be her date of rank. The applicant submits a copy of her promotion memorandum, dated 22 July 2004, showing she was promoted to major with an effective date and date of rank of 11 July 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019030

    Original file (20110019030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Cover Letter, Board for Correction of Military Records, dated 22 June 2011 * Record of Proceedings, Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), dated 21 June 2011 * Unit Manning Report, page 3 of 6, dated 8 August 2011 * Orders 028-334, dated 28 January 2010 * Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 MAJ, Reserve Component/Army Promotion List (RC/APL) Selection Board Results, page 10 of 21, dated 29 June 2010 * Special Orders 166 AR, dated 2 August 2010 * Special Orders 169...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013642

    Original file (20100013642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The 814th AG Company Unit Manning Report prepared on 5 November 2008 shows she was assigned to the position of Chief Human Resources Sergeant (position number 0020) in the rank of 1SG in MOS 42A5O on 22 August 2007. b. SFC S____ of the USAR 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (ESC) emailed several individuals, including the applicant indicating the applicant had been recommended [i.e., selected] for promotion to SGM against a position at her unit, the 814th AG Company. c. 1SG B____ [the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012854

    Original file (20140012854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Memorandum, dated 8 October 2014, from HRC, subject: Advisory Opinion Regarding Promotion to LTC for [applicant], states: * the applicant's request is without merit * the FY 2013 JA promotion list to LTC was approved on 30 September 2013 * the Office of Promotions promotes TPU officers based on either the date that officer is assigned to a position at the next higher grade or the maximum TIG, whichever comes first * an AHRC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement) was never received for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080762C070215

    Original file (2002080762C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction to her date of rank for major to 25 October 1997. Orders dated 28 January 1998, show she was transferred to the IRR to accept promotion to major effective 28 January 1998. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021246

    Original file (20110021246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 January 2012 in a response to the advisory opinion, the applicant stated he was supplying documentation to show he was assigned to an LTC position on 28 January 1998 and he had a current physical on file at that time. The evidence of record shows the 2003 SSB selected the applicant for promotion to LTC under the 1997 LTC APL board criteria. The Chief, Promotions, HRC, opined that if documentation was provided to verify the applicant was assigned to an LTC position prior to 29 May 1998...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019274

    Original file (20090019274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's medical records and profiling documents are not available for review by the Board. To support its opinion, the advisory official provided a copy of a memorandum from the director of officer personnel management to the office of Reserve component promotions, dated 17 June 2009, requesting publication of promotion orders for the applicant to the rank of LTC with a DOR of 12 June 2009 based on assignment to a valid position of higher authority, effective 27 May 2009. This...