Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014012
Original file (20080014012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  25 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080014012 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his unit received the Meritorious Unit Commendation while assigned to the Army-Navy Riverine Force.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of two articles from the Internet entitled Army-Navy Mobile Riverine Force and Riverine Assault Force, and his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20070017982, on 17 April 2008.

2.  In the original findings, the ABCMR determined the Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), which lists campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation emblems awarded during the Vietnam Conflict, did not show the applicant's unit, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division, had received the Meritorious Unit Commendation for Vietnam service.

3.  The two articles from the Internet entitled, Army-Navy Mobile Riverine Force and Riverine Assault Force, submitted by the applicant are new evidence which require that his case be reconsidered by the ABCMR.

4.  The article entitled Army-Navy Mobile Riverine Force provides a brief history of the Mobile Riverine Force and the types of missions completed by that force.  It is mentioned in the article that the Navy Mobile Riverine Force and the Army 2nd Brigade of the 9th Infantry Division were to become partners in the war effort.  A paragraph at the end of the article mentioned that the Sailors and Soldiers of the Mobile Riverine Force were awarded scores of personal awards for valor as well as many unit awards, one of which was the Meritorious Unit Commendation.  However, specific units and dates of awards were not provided.

5.  The article entitled Riverine Assault Force also provides a brief history of the Mobile Riverine Force and the types of missions completed by that force.  This article also mentions the 2nd Brigade of the 9th Infantry Division as being a part of the Mobile Riverine Force.  The article lists the composition of the Mobile Riverine Base from which normally one or two infantry battalions and one river assault squadron operated.  However, the list does not include the applicant's unit, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 60th Infantry.

6.  A history of the 2nd Brigade, 9th Infantry Division in the Republic of Vietnam from February 1966 to September 1967, obtained from the Internet, shows the 
3rd Battalion, 60th Infantry was a part of the 2nd Brigade, 9th Infantry Division.

7.  During his tour in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant was assigned to the 3rd Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, 9th Infantry Division.

8.  A copy of a citation submitted by the applicant with his original application shows the Meritorious Unit Commendation was awarded to Headquarters, Headquarters Company and Band, Support Command, 9th Infantry Division.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he is authorized the Meritorious Unit Commendation for his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

2.  The articles submitted by the applicant provide histories of the Mobile Riverine Force and the types of missions completed by that force in the Republic of Vietnam.  These articles do not provide specific awards, dates of awards, or the units receiving awards.  

3.  The citation for the Meritorious Unit Commendation, previously submitted by the applicant, was awarded to Headquarters, Headquarters Company and Band, Support Command, 9th Infantry Division   There is no evidence the applicant was ever assigned to that unit.  

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  __X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20070017982, dated 17 April 2008.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014012



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080014012



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017944C070206

    Original file (20050017944C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (Army), the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Bronze Star Medal, the Combat Action Ribbon, the Navy Unit Commendation, the Presidential Unit Citation (Navy), and the Joint Service Commendation Medal. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); his letter to the Awards Branch; a citation for the Navy Unit Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019776

    Original file (20080019776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart, the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Personnel Qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006739C070206

    Original file (20050006739C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Good Conduct Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal, the 1960 Device to be affixed to the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, a second award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, one individual award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006453

    Original file (20110006453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * CAR eligibility requirements * NUC Citation * DA Form 1 (Morning Report) for Company E, 3d Battalion, 60th Infantry Regiment, dated 7 March 1968 * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), pages 2 and 3 * Air Medal Citation * General Orders Number 11344, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, dated 16 December 1968 * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * History of 2d Brigade, 9th Infantry Division, five pages,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012168

    Original file (20120012168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a combat infantryman the whole time he was in Vietnam assigned to Company C, 2d Battalion, 60th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division. However, there is no evidence to show he engaged in active ground combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018977

    Original file (20080018977.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Medical Badge, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and the Bronze Star Medal. Since the applicant has met the requirements for award of the Combat Medical Badge, the entry on his DA Form 20 is accepted as sufficient evidence to amend his DD Form 214 to show award the Combat Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005670C070205

    Original file (20060005670C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 December 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005670 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now under consideration on 2 September 1971; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error expired on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004173

    Original file (20130004173.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) showing he was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. Therefore, the preponderance of the evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service from 17 July 1968 to 16 July 1970 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. Deleting the following awards from his DD Form 214: * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012395

    Original file (20100012395.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge because he was awarded the badge by his company commander while serving in the RVN during the period January to June 1969. There are no orders that show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021266

    Original file (20110021266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 or 3 bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship...