Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013753
Original file (20080013753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 December 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013753 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reissued DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be amended to show his Vietnam service.

2.  The applicant states that he never received a DD Form 214 until June 2008 so he was never aware his Vietnam service was not on it.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his reissued DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 3 September 1968.

3.  Item 38 of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Company B, 2d Battalion (Airmobile), 501st Infantry, on 11 March 1969.

4.  On or about 29 May 1969, the applicant was medically evacuated from Vietnam for an unknown reason after being credited with participation in one campaign.

5.  On 27 July 1971, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  His original DD Form 214 and item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) of his reissued DD Form 214 do not show he served any foreign service.  Neither his original nor his reissued DD Form 214 show he was awarded any medals for service in Vietnam.  It appears the applicant signed the original DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The version in effect at the time the applicant's DD Form 214 was reissued stated that the total period of foreign service and the last overseas theater in which service was performed would be entered in item 18f. 

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.  

9.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U. S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,        U. S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served in Vietnam for 
2 months and 19 days.  Item 18f of his reissued DD Form 214 should therefore be corrected to show he served 2 months and 19 days of foreign service in the U. S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC).

2.  Because he served in Vietnam, the applicant is eligible for award of the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Adding these awards to his reissued DD Form 214 will serve as additional confirmation that he served in Vietnam.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ____X___  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  amending item 18f of his reissued DD Form 214 to show he served            2 months and 19 days of foreign service in USARPAC; and

     b.  adding the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his reissued DD Form 214.



      _______XXX_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013753



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013753



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018189

    Original file (20140018189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. Item 30 of the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge on 28 September 1971 listed his Vietnam service dates. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending on 28 September 1971 the: * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001170

    Original file (20150001170.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the Vietnam Service Medal and Vietnam Campaign Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 18f of his DD Form 214 the entry, "0-7-0" and adding the entry, "USARPAC 0-7-12" * adding to item 26 of this form: * Vietnam Service Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140008952

    Original file (AR20140008952.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states his DD Form 214 does not show his service in Vietnam; however, he was there in 1971. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he completed foreign service in – * U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) from 1 April 1971 to 18 July 1971 * U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC)/Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 September 1971 through 22 March 1972 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to duty in Vietnam with two units – * Company H, 75th Rangers, 3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005734

    Original file (20120005734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on his service in Vietnam, he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 20 August 1971 through 19 August 1974 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011580

    Original file (20120011580.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his discharge document to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and his awards and decorations. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 18f of his 27 April 1971 DD Form 214 the entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000958

    Original file (20120000958.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 27 January 1978, to show: * Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) a credit for his service in Vietnam * Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Commendations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) all and any awards he is entitled to 2. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004269

    Original file (20110004269.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Once the above awards based on foreign service are entered on his DD Form 214 the lack of time showing in item 18f would not validate the awards shown. The Board also recommends that all Department of the Army records for the individual concerned be corrected and item 26 of his DD Form 214 be amended to show he is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018209

    Original file (20100018209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The regulation in effect at the time of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 12 March 1970 provided that for: a. item 18 (Record of Service), all service shown in 18a through 18f will be less time lost; and b. item 19, for Vietnam service place an X in the "yes" block and show the specific dates of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012015

    Original file (20100012015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show his foreign service or the awards he earned even though his military records clearly show he served in Vietnam and that he is authorized awards for this service. The applicant provides a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and two DD Forms 214 in support of this application. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 ending on 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006602

    Original file (20080006602.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served in Vietnam. There was no requirement at the time he separated to show dates of service in Vietnam on the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 October 1966 through 10 October 1968; and b. adding the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with three...