Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013665
Original file (20080013665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  25 November 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013665 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his rank and grade be restored to specialist four/E-4.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was in the hospital at the time he was reduced in grade and denied permission to defend himself.   

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This decision is being made on the only available evidence – the applicant's DD Form 214 and his self-authored statement. 

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the Regular Army from 15 July 1953 through 16 July 1956.  He was trained in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 941.20 (Cook).  He was honorably released from active duty and credited with 3 years of active Federal service.  His DD Form 214 shows his rank and grade as private first class/E-3 (Temporary) and his date of rank as 16 June 1956.  This form also shows he had 2 days of lost time.  

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's official record is presumed to have been destroyed in a fire in 1973 at the National Personnel Records Center.  The only available evidence for review was his DD Form 214.  This document shows his rank and grade as private first class/E-3 (Temporary) and his date of rank as 16 June 1956.

2.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered; however, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, administrative regularity is considered in his case.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement at this time.

 




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013665



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013665



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000794

    Original file (20150000794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He departed Korea in the rank of PV2 on 1 November 1956 and was transferred to Fort Sheridan, Illinois where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 1 December 1956 in the rank of PV2 (permanent) with a date of rank of 4 August 1956. A review of the available records failed to reveal why the applicant was reduced in grade from temporary E-3 to permanent E-2 and the applicant has not provided evidence to show that he should not have been reduced in grade. Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001186

    Original file (20090001186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank and Date of Appointment) on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show the rank of specialist third class. Evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged from the USAR in the rank of specialist five in February 1962. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021372

    Original file (20120021372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show in Item 6 (Effective Date of Separation) 4 December 1956 instead of 23 December 1953. The applicant states his records were destroyed in a fire and he needs his DD Form 214 corrected because he served in the Korean War. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011486

    Original file (20090011486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Contrary to the applicant’s belief that his DD Form 214 was reconstructed, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214 during his military service. With respect to the applicant’s rank at time of entry on active duty, the evidence of record shows that at the time of his induction and entry on active duty, the applicant held the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 which is correctly shown in item 18 of his first DD Form 214. With respect to his rank/grade at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013990

    Original file (20090013990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the National Defense Service Medal and the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The Army of Occupation Medal is awarded for service of thirty consecutive days at a normal post of duty in a qualifying location.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002874

    Original file (20150002874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he extended for a year and therefore he believes his DD Form 214 should show his separation date as 20 October 1957, not 1956. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026420

    Original file (20100026420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Commendation Ribbon with Metal Pendant [currently known as the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM)]. He states that item 18 (Grade – Rate or Rank at Time of Entry into Active Service) of his DD Form 214 lists his grade as private/pay grade E-1. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001722

    Original file (20130001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a SGT at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve; however, his discharge certificate shows he was a CPL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * a certificate of promotion, dated 6 June 1955 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 March 1956 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014918

    Original file (20130014918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank, and Date of Appointment) of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of her late husband, a former service (FSM), to show his rank as staff sergeant (SSG), pay grade E-6, with entitlement to back pay. The applicant provided copies of the following: * marriage license which shows she and the FSM were married on 11 June 1952 * two photographs alleged to be of herself and the...