Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013660
Original file (20080013660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013660 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her last name be changed from F_ _g to G_ _r on her Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal and other related retirement documents.  She also requests that her dates of service on the Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal be changed from 20 April 1984 to 19 April 1994, to 14 October 1973 to 19 April 1994.

2.  The applicant states that her name was legally changed from F_ _g to G_ _r on 15 June 1994 at the King County District Court in Seattle, Washington.  She states that the Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal was issued after 15 June 1994.  Her 29 years of service begin on 14 July 1963.  On  
21 September 1972 she had a break in service for personal reasons, but reentered the military on 14 October 1973.  She transferred to the Retired Reserve on to 19 April 1994.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a petition from King County District Court, State of Washington, Seattle Division dated 15 June 1994; Department of the Army, Office of the Chief, Army Reserve, Permanent Orders Number  
230-24 dated 8 September 1994; Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal dated 8 September 1994; Certificate of Retirement dated 26 December 2002; a letter addressed to her state representative dated 7 July 2008, with other correspondence in support of her application.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant on 8 August 1964, with her last name as K_ _ _ _y.  She was promoted to first lieutenant on 7 August 1966, to captain on 14 October 1973, to major on 15 December 1975, and to lieutenant colonel on 15 December 1981.  

3.  The applicant retired from the U.S. Army Reserve and was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 20 April 1994.  She completed 22 years of creditable service.

4.  The applicant's official records show a series of name changes as a result of marriage and divorce leading to her marriage on 6 June 1991, when she changed her name to F_ _g.  

5.  The court order from King County District Court, State of Washington, Seattle Division shows that the applicant's petition to change her last name from F_ _g to G_ _r was approved on 15 June 1994, which was two months after she had retired.  

6.  The Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal dated 8 September 1994 shows her last name as F_ _g for the period of service from 20 April  
1984 to 19 April 1994.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) in effect, at that time states, in pertinent part, that periods of service for each individual approaching retirement will be considered for an appropriate  decoration based on his grade, years of service, degree of responsibility, and manner of performance.  Meritorious service awards may be awarded upon retirement, which may include periods of service longer than that served in the recommending command.  It further states that such periods be limited to the the last 10 years of service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that her last name on her Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal should be changed from F_ _g to G-_ _r.

2.  There is no evidence in her official records that show the applicant submitted a request through Army channels to have her last name changed prior to her retirement date on 20 April 1994.  

3.  While the applicant's last name was legally changed on 15 June 1994, the applicant had already retired from the service.  As such, the certificate of award was correctly prepared based upon her legal name in her official records at that time.  

4.  Regulatory guidance provides that meritorious service awards may be awarded upon retirement, but the periods of service must be limited to the last  
10 years of service.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to correction of her records to change the period of service on her Certificate of Award for the Meritorious Service Medal.

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, along with her application and the supporting evidence she provided, which confirms her legal name, will be filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this determination in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of her service in arms.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013660



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013660



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00588

    Original file (ND01-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00588 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010326, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. As explained in Enclosure 2, her Application for Correction before the Board of Correction of Naval Records, she was discharged based upon her perceived over familiarity with an enlisted subordinate while stationed at NAS Adak, Alaska. The summary of service clearly documents that a commission of a serious offense was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003433

    Original file (20150003433.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the applicant – * retired under TERA with 17 years, 1 month, and 26 days of active federal service * worked in an approved position for 2 years, 11 months, and 4 days to reach 20 years of combined service * had an ERQP date of 4 January 1997 * did not apply within the specified guidelines and cutoff dates until after the ERQP * had employment with the King County Adult and Juvenile Detention Center and Washington Corrections Center for Women that meets the guidelines laid out in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019216

    Original file (20130019216.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of her records shows she requested to change her last name to "S___k" on 5 April 1994. The evidence of record shows the applicant's last name was "S___k" at the time she retired on 31 July 2006. Her divorce did not occur until 29 April 2013, more than 6 years after she retired and was issued her DD Form 214.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01024

    Original file (MD04-01024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation and that the narrative reason for separation be changed to Expiration of Term of Service, with a letter from the NDRB recommending the Applicant for government service. F_” or “Applicant”) hereby submits this application to upgrade his discharge characterization from Other Than Honorable (OTH) to Honorable or Entry Level Separation, and to change the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016017

    Original file (20090016017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge; b. change of his name on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 March 1979 from H--- W---- S-------- to D---- W----- A-------; c. adding the Dragon Gunner Course to his DD Form 214; and d. awarding him the Korea Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Medal with Pistol (.45 Caliber) Bar. The applicant states after...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013571

    Original file (20080013571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be changed to reflect that his name and gender were legally changed. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013571 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013571 2 ARMY BOARD FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025925

    Original file (20100025925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her married name. The evidence of record shows the applicant's military service records reflect her maiden name and the approved official name changes that she requested throughout her military service. Records also show that, from that point on, her last name (i.e., "J-----n") is consistently recorded in her official military service records, including her DD Form 214, when she retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500088

    Original file (ND0500088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5420 CORB:003 14 Feb 06 From: Secretarial Review AuthorityTo: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Via: President, Naval Discharge Review BoardSubj: REQUEST FOR REVIEW: CASE OF H------O. MC____-, (B---------) , EX AT2, USNR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AT2, USNR Docket No. The Navy’s Drug Lab urinalysis test has indicated that her urine sample has indeed tested positive for cocaine, yet a civilian hair DNA test has...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002712

    Original file (20150002712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM divorced on 14 December 2008; however, he did not retire until recently * per their equitable distribution order, he was ordered to name her as the beneficiary of his SBP annuity * the FSM never informed her that he retired * recently, she was made aware that he had retired when she contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) about how to receive her half of his retired pay once he retired * she was also informed at this time that she...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600570

    Original file (ND0600570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The In the absence of a complete administrative discharge package in the service record, the NDRB vote was based on presumption of regularity in this case. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. ” The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: Secretary of the Navy...