Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013617
Original file (20080013617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  14 April 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013617 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of active service ending on 16 June 1995.

2.  The applicant states he served almost 3 years in the Regular Army and he received the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal during this timeframe.  He states he was never punished judicially or non-judicially during his period of active duty.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his 
DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 June 1995 and award criteria for the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal taken from the internet.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel records show that after having served 
1 year, 6 months, and 14 days in the Missouri Army National Guard he enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1992.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 31C (Single Channel Radio Operator).

3.  There is no evidence in the applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) that he was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  His records do not contain any records of court-martial or instances of non-judicial punishment.  There is no record of time lost.

4.  On 16 June 1995, the applicant was released from active duty by reason of hardship and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He had completed 2 years, 8 months, and 2 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show the applicant was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.  However, item 13 does show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Achievement Medal.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states, in pertinent part, that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  After 27 June 1950, to the present time, the current standard for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal is 3 years of qualifying service, but as little as 1 year is required for the first award in those cases when the period of service ends with the termination of active enlisted Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  In the instances of disqualification as determined by the unit commander, the commander will prepare a statement of rational for his or her decisions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his 
chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  His records also do not contain any adverse information.  

2.  In the absence of evidence showing disqualification, it is appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion qualifying service from 15 October 1992 to 16 June 1995, ending with termination of a period of Federal military service of more than 1 year and less than 3 years.  It would also be appropriate to add this award to item 13 of his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 15 October 1992 to 16 June 1995 and to add this award to item 13 of his DD Form 214.



      ________X_______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013617



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013617



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009339

    Original file (20090009339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show four awards of the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal, and any new medals related to his service in Southwest Asia. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Army Achievement Medal. Therefore, lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified the applicant, it would be appropriate to award him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001259C070205

    Original file (20060001259C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and the Cold War Recognition Certificate. He also requests that he be awarded any additional awards and medals to which he is entitled based on his service and that item 5 (Overseas Service), of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), be corrected to show that he served 5 months in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009472

    Original file (20100009472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Iraq Campaign Medal and he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows he served a qualifying period of service for award of the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007228

    Original file (20130007228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Southwest Asia Service Medal * Kuwait Liberation Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Army Achievement Medal 2. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations & Campaigns) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show the Army Commendation Medal or the Army Achievement Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020261

    Original file (20120020261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 of his DD Form 214 shows award of the: * Retirement Lapel Button * Meritorious Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (5th Award) * National Defense Service Medal * NCO Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral 3 * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon (2nd Award) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the sixth award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 March 1992 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015397

    Original file (20080015397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided orders, dated 24 March 1995, showing he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 18 June 1991 to 17 June 1995. This period is normally 3 years of enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Evidence of record shows the applicant was a PV1/E-1 with three years service at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023527

    Original file (20100023527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Southwest Asia Service Medal with two bronze service stars; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002120

    Original file (20140002120.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in – * item 5 (Oversea Service), Saudi Arabia from 8 January 1991 through 12 May 1991 * item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) – * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with (9mm) Pistol Bar * First Class (Expert) Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar * Army Service Ribbon * National Defense Service Medal * Southwest Asia Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars * Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018177

    Original file (20090018177.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the Army Commendation Medal with First Oak Leaf Cluster, the Army Good Conduct Medal (Second Award), the Humanitarian Service Medal, the Overseas Service Ribbon, and the Kuwait Liberation Medal - Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 15 October 1994. There is no evidence the applicant was issued the Army Good Conduct Medal (Second Award) for the period 16 October 1990 to 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017730

    Original file (20140017730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received an expeditionary medal for Haiti (presumed to be the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM)), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this...