Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013065
Original file (20080013065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        15 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080013065 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his branch as "Army Air Corps" instead of "Infantry" and his specialty as a "Basic Pilot" instead of "Antitank Gun Crewman." 

2.  The applicant states that the FSM completed and passed Basic Pilot training at Marana Air Field, Marana, Arizona, on 2 February 1945.

3.  The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application:

	a.  WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Service), dated 6 November 1945.

	b.  Certificate of Proficiency, dated 2 February 1945, Basic Pilot, Army Air Forces Training Command, Marana Army Air Field, Marana, Arizona.

	c.  FSM’s Certificate of Death, dated 13 July 2006.

	d.  Applicant's Certificate of Birth, (issued) on 16 December 1997.

	e.  Miscellaneous World War II era pictures.



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the FSM’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 3 February 1939 at Houston, Texas.  This form also shows the FSM was initially trained as an infantry Soldier; however, at the time of his separation, he was serving in military occupational specialty (MOS) 610 (Antitank Gun Crewman) and was assigned to Company H, 150th Infantry Regiment.

4.  The FSM's reconstructed records show he attended Basic Pilot training at the Marana Army Air Field, Marana, Arizona, from 23 November 1944 to 2 February 1945. 

5.  The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he served in the Panama Canal Zone during the period 27 July 1945 to 31 October 1945.  

6.  The FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he completed 6 years, 5 months, and 20 days of continental service; and 3 months and 14 days of foreign service.  He was honorably separated on 6 November 1945.

7.  Item 4 (Arm or Service) of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the entry "INF," indicating that he was in the Infantry Branch, and Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty and Number) shows the entry "Antitank Gun Crewman, 610." 
8.  The Army Air Corps was created from the Air Service in 1926 largely as a compromise between advocates of a separate air arm and those of the command structure of the U.S. Army who viewed the aviation arm as an auxiliary branch to support the ground forces.  Members worked to promote the concept of airpower between 1926 and 1941, but as a branch of the Army similar to the Signal or Quartermaster Corps, its primary purpose within that period remained support of ground forces rather than independent operations.  During World War II, the role of the Army Air Corps changed again.  On 9 March 1942, with the issuance of War Circular 59, the Army Air Corps was further subordinated to the U.S. Army Air Force as a combatant arm (as infantry and field artillery were subordinate combatant arms of the Army Ground Forces) and the office of Chief of the Air Corps was abolished.  The Congress did not disestablish the Army Air Corps until 26 July 1947, with the passage of the National Security Act of 1947. 

9.  Between 1912 and 1942, records indicate nearly 3,000 enlisted men of the Signal Corps, Air Service and the Army Air Forces became sergeant pilots. Between 1919 and 1973, about 3,700 served with the Navy, Marines and Coast Guard.  In all, sergeant pilots totaled a little more than 1 percent of all trained military pilots.  Training enlisted men as pilots was, indeed, a controversial concept.  While it was necessary to meet the personnel needs of a rapidly expanding aviation field, it was questionable whether or not they'd make good leaders and commissioned officers.  "After all," according to one opinion, "they lacked certain educational and cultural requirements." 

10.  But the need for increased manpower prevailed, as evidenced by the Air Corps Act of 1926 and Public Law 99, enacted June 3, 1941. Both pieces of legislation authorized the training of enlisted pilots.  The main differences between enlisted and commissioned pilot training at the time was age and education.  Enlisted aviation students had to be 18 to 22 years old, while commissioned cadets were 20 to 27 years old.  Enlisted men had to graduate from an accredited high school, rank in the upper half of their classes and have one-and-a-half math credits.  Basic college requirements were waived.  

11.  Sergeant pilots were intended to fill the essential and unglamorous needs of military aviation.  They were to serve as utility pilots, hauling cargo and people, or as instructors.  Instead, they played vital roles in pioneering the development of both military and civilian aviation.  Indeed, many of the aircraft flown in the Allied invasion of North Africa on Nov. 9, 1942, were piloted by enlisted men.  Although they began flying as enlisted pilots, eventually all were commissioned or became flight officers, precursor to warrant officers.  Flight officer ranks were created to compensate the sergeant pilots, putting them on an even level with commissioned pilots.

12.  While most enlisted pilots were promoted to flight officer or second lieutenant by May 1943, orders did not always catch up to those in the field.  Subsequently, many were still listed on the squadron books as staff sergeants.  While some opted to stay in for a career, others left for opportunities in civilian aviation.  Of those who left, some were recalled to active duty to fly support missions during the Berlin Airlift and Korean War.  More than 155 were killed in action, 17 became fighter aces and 11 reached general officer ranks.

13.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The DD Form 214 replaced the WD AGO Form 53-55 after WWII.  The regulation currently in effect, directs, in pertinent part, that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of their military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  This regulation specified that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty to include attendance at basic and advanced training.  It also states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty.  Item 4 of the WD AGO Form 53-5 in effect at the time showed the Soldier's arm or service and Item 30 showed the Soldier’s MOS at the time of separation. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to correct his deceased father's records to show he was a Basic Pilot in the Army Air Corps and the evidence submitted by the applicant was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant the requested relief.

2.  The available evidence shows the FSM was trained and served as an infantry Soldier throughout his military service.  He served with the 23rd Infantry; the 102nd Infantry; and the 150th Infantry at the Panama Canal Zone.  Had he been commissioned in the Army Air Corps as a pilot, he would have been issued a WD AGO Form 53-55, discharging him from his enlisted status, and even if he was commissioned, his separation document would still show his infantry specialty at the time of separation.

3.  In view of the foregoing evidence, it appears that the FSM was trained as a basic pilot as evidenced by the certificate of training, but was never utilized in that capacity, appointed, or commissioned.  As such, his arm or service on his separation document is correctly shown as infantry.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X_____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013065



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080013065



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007137

    Original file (20140007137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the wife of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to add the Purple Heart. The FSM was accidentally injured in the line of duty in Germany, on 9 April 1945, when a fellow Soldier was hit by enemy fire and dropped the tail gate of an antitank gun on the FSM's foot. His WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show award of the Purple Heart or indicate that he received any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002236C070206

    Original file (20050002236C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge). Since the FSM’s pay records show that he received expert infantry pay, and the letter from the Assistant Adjutant shows he was authorized to wear the Expert Infantryman Badge, it is reasonable to presume that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009116

    Original file (20090009116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) of her late husband by adding the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a "Century Division Rangers Certificate of Proficiency." The evidence further confirms the FSM was receiving combat infantry pay at the time of his separation, which was only authorized to holders of the CIB, as evidenced by the WD Form 372 A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015356,

    Original file (20070015356,.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Mr. D___ concludes by stating “[h]ad [the applicant] not been misdirected into refusing an extended enlistment, he would have only served an additional 38 days prior to discharge and would have received his wings and commission.” Mr. D___ also urges correction of the applicant’s records to show he was commissioned in October 1945; d. WD AGO Form 53-98 (Military Record and Report of Separation - Certificate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003458

    Original file (20070003458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available for review. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007578

    Original file (20100007578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army medical records from 1941 show the date he was wounded in action as 14 October 1943 and not 18 September 1943 as shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55. There are no general orders in the available records that show award of the Silver Star. The applicant contends that her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show the Silver Star, his rank as a S/Sgt, and the date wounded as 14 October 1943.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015949

    Original file (20110015949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the son of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show he was a Prisoner of War (POW) from 16 December 1944 to 7 April 1945 and was awarded the POW Medal. Based on his entitlement to the Combat Infantryman Badge, he is entitled to award of the Bronze Star Medal and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000408

    Original file (20130000408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and a second award of the Bronze Star Medal based on the Combat Infantryman Badge. It states the Combat Infantryman Badge may be awarded to any infantryman who, on or after 6 December 1941, has established eligibility and had been recommended for such award. His argument ignores the basic requirement for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge which is you have to be an infantryman or as stated in the first governing circular "the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015524

    Original file (20060015524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060015524 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 6 (Organization), of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge, shows his last duty station prior to his discharge was, Camp McQuaide, California. However, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017634

    Original file (20100017634.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show: * his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) * award of the: * Combat Infantryman Badge * Bronze Star Medal * Forward Observer Badge * Presidential Unit Citation [sic] 2. For services performed during World War II, awards will be made only to service units and only for services performed...