Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012891
Original file (20080012891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012891 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in two separate applications, correction of his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to reflect his service in the summer of 1974 at Camp Guernsey, Wyoming.

2.  The applicant states that he has no record of his service at Camp Guernsey and that he previously made a request for this correction.  He states that in his previous request he stated that the year of his service at Camp Guernsey was 1973; however, he has since remembered the year was 1974.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 



has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 19 November 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army in Fairmont, West Virginia.  He successfully completed his training as a field artillery crewman.

3.  The applicant was transferred to Korea on 1 October 1971 and he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 1st Battalion, 15th Field Artillery, 2nd Infantry Division.

4.  The applicant returned to the Continental United States on 24 May 1972.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 25 May 1972 and he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his Reserve obligation.

5.  A review of the available records does not show that he served at Camp Guernsey, Wyoming, in 1974.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual's service as it exists on the date of REFRAD, discharge, or retirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation.  His DD Form 214 properly shows his active duty service from 19 November 1970 through 25 May 1972.  

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was properly prepared to reflect his service as it existed at the time of his REFRAD which was on 25 May 1972.  There are no provisions for including any service that he may have had after 25 May 1972 to his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012891



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012891



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005063

    Original file (20090005063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080012891, dated 13 November 2008. The applicant's records show he served in various assignments within and outside continental United States and was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 on 25 May 1972 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004727

    Original file (20110004727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as E-5 and his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 44C2O (Welder). His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows his pay grade as E-4 and his PMOS as 13A1O. In the absence of evidence to show he was promoted to pay grade E-5 and that PMOS 44C2O was awarded prior to his REFRAD on 14 February 1972, there appears to be no basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019086

    Original file (20100019086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. However, his records do contain a duly authenticated DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) which shows that he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 30 December 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. In the absence of evidence to the contrary it must be presumed that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001060

    Original file (20100001060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that: a. he cannot remember any dates surrounding his military service; b. he does recall he was in Vietnam for almost a year to the date c. his Vietnam service shown in item 30 of his DD Form 214 is wrong; and d. he was separated on temporary records because a captain swore to him there was no record of him being in the Army. The applicant contends item 22c and item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected. Regarding the applicant’s request for a complete history of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006142C070206

    Original file (20050006142C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He goes on to state that he wants his records to show his combat service as an artilleryman. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021258

    Original file (20090021258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations Commendation and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 25 March 1970 to add all awards earned on active duty and in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Therefore, a second award of this award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002978

    Original file (20090002978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his second award of the Army Commendation Medal and correction of his official military record to include the award of the Purple Heart. The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his discharge shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with seven bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960, the Republic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018109

    Original file (20100018109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was discharged in pay grade E-6; he was awarded the Korean Service Medal (KSM) with three bronze service stars, the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the American Defense Service Medal (ADSM), the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation (ROKPUC), the Army of Occupation Medal (AOM); and that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012621

    Original file (20110012621.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: a. award of the Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; b. that his unit of assignments in Vietnam be reflected on his DD Form 214; and c. his DA Form 2545 (Cryptographic Access Authorization, Briefing Certificates) be corrected to show he held a higher security clearance than "Confidential." His DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 May 1971 was prepared while he was serving in Vietnam,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019930

    Original file (20090019930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she is requesting correction of the name and gender recorded in her military records and on her DD Form 214 to her new legal name and gender. All documents and orders on file in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) that contain a name and/or gender show the first name John and gender as male. The fact that subsequent to service the applicant changed her first name and gender does not provide a sufficiently mitigating basis for changing the...