IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 4 DECEMBER 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080012838
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to reflect that he was awarded the Silver Star.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that the award is shown in his files, but not on his DD Form 214.
3. In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his general orders for the Silver Star and his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 March 1968. He completed basic and advanced individual training and was assigned military occupational specialty 11C, infantry indirect fire crewman. He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 30 July 1968 to 6 November 1968, with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 8th Calvary, 1st Air Calvary Division, and Company C, 1st Battalion, 8th Cavalry, 1st Air Cavalry Division.
3. The applicant was wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 5 October 1968 and placed in a patient status. He was transferred in a patient status to the Valley Forge General Hospital, Phoenixville, Pennsylvania, on 8 November 1968.
4. The applicant was released from active duty, in pay grade E-3, on 23 September 1969, for the purpose of retirement and transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List.
5. Entries on the applicants DD Form 214, Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) list the following awards: the National Defense Service Medal; the Vietnam Service Medal; the Vietnam Campaign Medal; the Good Conduct Medal; the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge, with Rifle Bar; and the Purple Heart. The Silver Star is not listed on his DD Form 214.
6. The applicant's records contain General Orders Number 6, dated 22 January 1969, wherein he was awarded the Purple Heart at Valley Forge General Hospital.
7. The applicant submitted a copy of general orders, dated 22 January 1969, wherein he was awarded the Silver Star for his actions in the Republic of Vietnam on 28 September 1968. These orders were not assigned a number and do not contain the appropriate signature authority.
8. A search of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) was made for orders awarding the applicant the Silver Star. No orders for this award were found in the ADCARS.
9. A staff member from the Human Resources Command, Awards Branch, Alexandria, Virginia, verified that a stateside hospital would not have been given the authority to award the Silver Star.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy. The required gallantry (spirited and conspicuous acts of heroism and courage) must have been performed with marked distinction. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
11. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion, as in this case, the Silver Star. It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his files show he was awarded the Silver Star is acknowledged. However, the orders the applicant provided are insufficient for the addition of the Silver Star to his DD Form 214. These orders were not assigned a number and also do not contain the appropriate approving authority's signature required for authentication of award orders. There was also no evidence found in his military records to support his request.
2. While the available evidence is insufficient for adding the Silver Star to his DD Form 214, this in no way affects the applicants right to pursue his claim for this award by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080012838
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080012838
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013622
The applicant was a school-trained infantryman. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214, the Vietnam Service Medal; b. adding to his DD Form 214, the Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Valorous Unit Award, the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005006
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the: * Air Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) 12. Therefore, he is entitled to one silver service star for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this service star. As a result, the Board recommends...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018069
There are no orders or any other documents on file in the applicant's MPRJ to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH or AM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 29 April 1968; b. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000042
Headquarters, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 15473, dated 6 December 1969, awarded the applicant the Bronze Star Medal with V device for action on 12 August 1969. The evidence of record shows he was awarded two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, one for service and one for valor. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and the Bronze Star Medal with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002888
The applicant requested award of the Silver Star and correction of his record to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 3 May 1966 through 2 May 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019560
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the award of the Bronze Star Medal or the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028590
Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence showing he was wounded as result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis to award the Purple Heart in this case. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007043
The applicant requests correction of his records to show three awards of the Purple Heart and a Bronze Star Medal. The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any documentation to show he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for a wound received on or about 31 July 1968; b. awarding the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008074
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Silver Star, Purple Heart, or any additional Air Medals. His record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in Vietnam or that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024384
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), RVN Civil Actions Honor First Class Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Silver Star. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, effective 5 June 1970; DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 2...