Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012781
Original file (20080012781.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  9 October 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012781 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states that he enlisted so that he could fight for freedom.  He claims that he was young and dumb.  When there was no more war, there was no further need for him.  He says that he has always been a law abiding citizen and believes in the American way.  

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  On 13 September 1976, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 
3 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 41C (Fire Control Instrument Repairman).

3.  On 26 February 1977, the applicant was assigned for duty with Company C, 801st Maintenance Battalion, Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

4.  On 8 December 1977, charges were preferred under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for violation of Article 86, for being absent without leave (AWOL), during the period from on or about 31 October to 1 December 1977 (31 days).  

5.  On 12 December 1977, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him.  Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial. 

6.  In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or to a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He further acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request was approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law.   

7.  On 29 December 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Under Other than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.  On 8 February 1978, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  He had completed a total of 1year, 3 months, and 
26 days of creditable active military service and had accrued 31 days of time lost due to AWOL.

8.  There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.



9.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trail by court-martial.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

10.  The Manual for Courts-Martial provides for a maximum punishment of a punitive discharge and confinement for 1 year for violation of Article 86, AWOL of more than 30 days.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  There is no indication that his request was made under coercion or duress.

2.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



	___________X____________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012781



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007408

    Original file (20080007408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 April 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. ___ XXX ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013406

    Original file (20130013406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 October 1977, the applicant was charged with being AWOL from his unit from on or about 9 March 1977 until on or about 7 October 1977. Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel). On 31 October 1977, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under other than honorable conditions and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015632

    Original file (20130015632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015315

    Original file (20100015315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 1977, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. On 18 March 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he be discharged UOTHC. On 18 May 1979, the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011204

    Original file (20100011204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011204 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 13 March 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant's record of service shows he was AWOL 92 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016044

    Original file (20110016044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. On 18 July 1977, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005549

    Original file (20130005549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or to a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027426

    Original file (20100027426.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. As a result, a subsequent DD Form 458 was prepared preferring an additional charge against the applicant for violating Article 86 of the UCMJ by being AWOL from on or about 14 March to on or about 20 June 1977. As a result, his record of service did not support the issuance of an honorable or a general discharge by the separation authority at the time of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014164

    Original file (20080014164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 August 1978, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016288

    Original file (20140016288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Statement regarding his absence * Letters to his next of kin * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) * Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) decision * DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) * Multiple post-service certificates and letters CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form...