Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012034
Original file (20080012034.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080012034 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his rank and discharge dates on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 3 August 1962 be corrected.

2.  The applicant states he is providing copies of his discharge and promotion documents.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214; his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214); a letter from XI United States Army Corps; a letter from the Claims Division, Finance Center, U.S. Army, Indianapolis, Indiana; his discharge orders; and two certificates.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was initially commissioned a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 26 June 1953 and he was ordered to active duty on 
31 October 1953.  He was released from active duty on 6 October 1955 and promoted to 1st lieutenant in the USAR effective 7 October 1955.  He continued to serve in the USAR as a non-unit officer and a unit officer.  On 1 October 1961, he was recalled to active duty with his unit in the grade of 1st lieutenant.

3.  Headquarters Fort Devens, Fort Devens, Massachusetts, Special Orders Number 138, dated 10 July 1962 show that on 3 August 1962 the applicant was released from active duty.  Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of the applicant's 
DD Form 214 contains the entry "1st Lt O-2" (1st lieutenant/pay grade O-2).  
Item 3b (Date of Rank) shows his date of rank as 6 March 1959 and Item 11d (Effective Date) shows he was released from active duty on 3 August 1962.

4.  On 11 December 1963, the ABCMR recommended that all Department of the Army records be corrected to show the applicant was promoted to captain (CAPT)/pay grade O-3 in the USAR effective 6 October 1959 and that he was ordered to active duty on 1 October 1961 in the grade of CAPT/pay grade O-3.

5.  On 6 January 1964, the Under Secretary of the Army approved the recommendations of the 11 December 1963 ABCMR decision.

6.  The applicant submitted a letter from the U.S. Army Finance Center, dated 
10 March 1964, that addressed the matter of payment due to the applicant based on the action taken by the Under Secretary of the Army.

7.  The discharge orders, dated 25 October 1965, submitted by the applicant show he was honorably discharged from the USAR effective 25 October 1965.

8.  An Honorable Discharge Certificate, submitted by the applicant, shows his date of discharge from the Army of the United States as 25 October 1965.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation stated, in pertinent part, that a DD Form 214 would be issued at the time of separation to each member of the Regular Army and each member of the Reserve components and the Army of the United States (AUS) without component called or ordered to active duty or active duty for training (ACDUTRA) for a period of 90 days or more.  




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his rank and discharge dates on his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 3 August 1962 are incorrect.

2.  The Under Secretary of the Army approved the ABCMR's recommendation to show the applicant was promoted to captain effective 6 October 1959 and ordered to active duty on 1 October 1961 in the grade of captain.  Therefore, it is appropriate to change Item 3a of his DD Form 214 to read "CAPT O-3" instead of "1st Lt O-2" and to change Item 3b to show his date of rank as 6 October 1959.

3.  The DD Form 214 is a record of active duty performed by a Soldier.  The applicant's orders show he was released from active duty on 3 August 1962.  The period the applicant spent in the USAR does not change the period during which he was on active duty.  Therefore, the effective date in Item 11d of the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing the following items of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 3 August 1962:

	a.  change Item 3a to read "CAPT O-3" instead of "1st Lt O-2"; and

	b.  change Item 3b to read "6 October 1959" instead of "6 Mar 59."



2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the applicant's discharge date.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012034



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080012034



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005525

    Original file (20140005525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), ending on 6 August 1962, to show his rank/grade as captain (CPT)/O-3 vice first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2. His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows in: * Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) - 1LT/O-2 * Item 3b (Date of Rank) - 1 November 1959 * Item 32 (Remarks) - Temporary 1LT,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085082C070212

    Original file (2003085082C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The FSM's military records show: The FSM's records show that he was promoted to Captain in the AUS with a date of appointment and a date of rank of 18 December 1951.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012880

    Original file (20110012880.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not promoted to SGT during the period covered by this DD Form 214. c. He did not serve through 1965 during the period covered by his DD Form 214. d. He arrived in Germany on 18 April 1960 and remained in Germany through his release from active duty date on 5 November 1961, a period of 1 year, 6 months, and 27 days. With respect to his first DD Form 214 that covered his active duty from 6 November 1961 to 22 March 1963, the applicant will be provided with a copy of this form: a. He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003645

    Original file (20140003645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 26 of this DD Form 214 lists "None" for citations and badges. He was appointed in the USAR in the rank of LTC in 1983, after his period of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correction of this DD Form 214 to list in item 3a his rank as LTC and in item 26 his Certificate of Achievement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013415

    Original file (20110013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he held the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 instead of private first class (PFC)/pay grade E-3 at the time of his release from active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of REFRAD, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he held the rank of SP4/E-4 at the time of REFRAD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004046

    Original file (20140004046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 for this period of service (4 October 1951 to 5 January 1958) is not available for review with this case. A DD Form 214 (enlisted) for his period of service from 4 October 1951 to 5 January 1958 is not available for review with this case. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to listing his: * service in Korea from September 1952 to September 1954 * overseas assignments in Germany, Kwajalein, and Korea * rank as sergeant first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006291

    Original file (20120006291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the following new facts are not reflected in his Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceeding nor are they reflected in his military records (DA Form 24 (Service Record) and DD Form 214): a. He provides his DA Form 24, prepared on 22 January 1962, for the period 28 October 1955 to 26 October 1957; and his DA Form 20. His record contains: * DA Form 24 for the period 28 October 1955 to 25 October 1957 which shows he was promoted to SP3 (T) on 24 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017884

    Original file (20140017884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that his DD Form 214 correctly shows the rank/grade (i.e., SGT/E-5) that he held on the date he was REFRAD. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge orders correctly show the rank/grade (i.e., SSGT/E-6) that he held on the date he was discharged from the USAR. Further, his military personnel records, including his DD Form 214 and USAR discharge orders, correctly show his rank/ grade at the time of his separation from active duty and also at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002553

    Original file (20150002553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his rank was SP4/E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. The applicant’s records are not available for the Board to review; however, there is sufficient evidence provided by the applicant to address his request.