Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011977
Original file (20080011977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011977 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, through a member of congress, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his correct first name.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his military record incorrectly documents his first name.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application:  Congressional Chief of Legislative Liaison Facsimile documents with Member of Congress Letter dated 30 June 2008; Privacy Act Statement; Medicare Health Insurance Card; Birth Certificate; and Separation Document (DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered using the reconstructed record and the DD Form 214 that the applicant provides.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 contains the first name he now claims is in error.  It also shows he entered active duty in the Army of the United States on 4 November 1952, and that he continuously served until he was honorably discharged on 3 November 1954, by reason of expiration term of service (ETS).

4.  The DD Form 214 shows that the applicant earned the following awards during his tenure on active duty:  United Nations Service Medal; Korean Service Medal with bronze service star; Overseas Service Bar; Combat Infantryman Badge; National Defense Service Medal and the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation.  It also shows that he completed 2 years active military service and the applicant authenticated this document with his signature using the first name that he now claims is in error in Item 48 (Signature of Person Being Separated).

5.  The applicant provides a copy of his Medicare Health Insurance Card which contains the name that he now indicates is correct.  He also provides an illegible birth certificate in which the first name cannot be determined.

6.  The Privacy Act Statement includes a self-authored statement written by the applicant.  In it he indicates that the first name indicated on his DD Form 214 is the simpler English name that he chose to use since grade school, which was common practice in 1932.  However, he states that it is different from the name he was given at birth.

7.  War Department Technical Manual 12-235 (Discharge and Release From Active Duty) provided the policy for the preparation, issue, and distribution of separation documents at the time of the applicant’s separation.  The guidance contained in this publication provided for entering the last name, first name and middle initial of the member as recorded in the Service Record. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the first name listed throughout his military record is incorrect and should be changed has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.


2.  The applicant’s military record was not available for review.  However, he provided a properly constituted separation document that lists the first name that the applicant now claim is incorrect.  Further, the applicant authenticated this document using that same name that he now indicates is incorrect.  His signature was his verification that the information, including his name, was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued.  Based on his signature, it is clear that the applicant’s active duty service was performed under the name he now claims is in error.  In addition, he confirms that he chose this simpler English first name since grade school rather than the first name given him at birth.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The information contained therein should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created and under which the military service was performed.  Therefore, the name listed in the applicant’s remaining reconstructed military records should not be changed at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______x _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011977





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011977



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001318

    Original file (20110001318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show the correct spelling of his first name as Benjamin. The various documents contained in his available record also shows he signed these documents using the spelling of his first name that he now claims is incorrect. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms the correct spelling of his first name, will be filed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019688

    Original file (20100019688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) contains, among other documents, the following documents that show his first name as the name he now claims is incorrect: * DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) * DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record) * DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status on Release from Active Duty) * Army Good Conduct Medal and separation orders The evidence also shows that of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003574

    Original file (20110003574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his first name as "Meridith" instead of "Meredith." The applicant provides of his: * Medicare Health Insurance card * Certificate of Live Birth * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 December 1962 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 May 1963 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012555

    Original file (20130012555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    All of the documents contained in the applicant’s Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (previously known as the official military personnel file) lists SSN “XXX-XX-XX8X,” which he now claims is incorrect. His record clearly lists this SSN on all applicable documents maintained throughout his military service. Absent convincing independent and verifiable evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the applicant's military service records, including the DD Form 214, were correct at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022430

    Original file (20120022430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant contends the name recorded in his military service record should be corrected because it does not correspond with his name as recorded on his birth certificate, Social Security card, and other official records. The applicant's military service record clearly shows his preferred name (i.e., with the middle initial "F") and he signed several documents during his military service with his signature that included the middle initial "F." In addition, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006751

    Original file (20090006751.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his middle initial be corrected in his military records. Item 1 (Last Name - First Name - Middle Name) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the applicant's middle initial as a "V." 4. The evidence shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and at the time was identified as having a middle name that began with the letter "V." 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013092

    Original file (20110013092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlistment Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty on 28 May 1969, lists his first name as Steven in Item 1 (Name and Social Security Number). However, the record shows he entered, served, and was released from active duty under the first name listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020052

    Original file (20120020052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. It does not appear he used the last name of "M__a___" at any time during his service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000200

    Original file (20120000200.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United State Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his: * social security number (SSN) as "xx7-xx-xxxx" instead of "xx6-xx-xxxx" * date of birth (DOB) as 14 October 1945 instead of 24 October 1945 2. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which was created upon his entry on active duty listed his SSN as "xx7-xx-xxxx" and his DOB as 14 October 1945. The evidence of record shows upon his induction and entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008574

    Original file (20080008574.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He indicates that he went to court to have his name correctly listed on his birth certificate and states that all of his civilian records now show his correct name; however his proof of this action was lost. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.