Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011893
Original file (20080011893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       6 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011893 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 214) to show all of his awards.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he wants an update showing the awards he is authorized.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; Letter of Transfer, effective 2 December 1954; a training course certificate for Arithmetic I, dated   24 February 1954; his Service Record (DD Form 230) for the period from            8 January 1953 to 7 January 1961; his Qualification Record - Enlisted Personnel (DA Form 20); Special Orders Number 279, 1264 Army Support Unit, dated      29 November 1954; his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 5 January 1961; and Letter Order Number 7-78G (Annual Training Order) dated18 July 1956, with amendment dated 26 July 1956.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 8 January 1953, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 1815 (Ordnance Supply Specialist).

3.  On or about 13 July 1953, the applicant was assigned for duty as an ordnance supply specialist in the Federal Republic of Germany.  He returned to the United States on or about 1 December 1954.

4.  On 1 December 1954, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  He had attained the rank of private, pay grade E-2 and had completed 1 year, 
10 months and 24 days of creditable active duty service.

5.  Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal and the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp.

6.  Item 39 (Qualification in Arms) of his DA Form 20 shows that he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle [M-1] Bar and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.  

7.  Section 17 (Indorsements) of the applicant's DD Form 230, shows that on 
2 December 1954 he was favorably considered for award of the Good Conduct Medal.

8.  Army Regulation 600-65 (later superseded by Army Regulation 672-5-1), 
in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning service medals.  It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 
27 August 1940, for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 
7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service and there must have been no convictions by court-martial.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was favorably considered for award of the Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he should be awarded this medal.

2.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.  Therefore, these awards should be shown on his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ____X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 8 January 1953 to 1 December 1954; and
   
   b.  showing, in addition to the awards already shown on his DD Form 214, that his awards include the Army Good Conduct Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011893





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011893



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014043

    Original file (20100014043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. (2) The applicant served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal from 4 August 1954 to 17 November 1955. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017002

    Original file (20090017002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Records show the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) and correct his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004691C070205

    Original file (20060004691C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his final DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to include award of the Korean Service Medal and the Army Occupation Medal with Germany clasp and to show he attended the Noncommissioned Officers School, the “Air-Transportability School” and had Combat Infantry Training. The applicant’s record includes six DD Forms 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016850

    Original file (20080016850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar, and three Overseas Service Bars. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 27 of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005323C070205

    Original file (20060005323C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 15 September 1951. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) as amended provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 to a date to be determined. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008189

    Original file (20140008189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains a DA Form 230 (Service Record) covering the period 27 July 1953 to 20 May 1955, and shows: a. His record contains a DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 15 March 1961 to 23 December 1963 and shows: a. As such, there is insufficient evidence to add campaign ribbons to either of his DD Forms 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085591C070212

    Original file (2003085591C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 17 March 1953 to 4 March 1957 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the United Nations Service Medal, the Korean Service Medal, the First Class Artillery Badge and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Antiaircraft Artillery Bar as authorized awards in Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations). Based on his service from 17 March 1953 through 17 May 1955, the applicant is entitled to award of the National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000344

    Original file (20120000344.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show award of the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019864

    Original file (20080019864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 21 June 1954 to show that he held the rank of staff sergeant and primary military occupational specialty (MOS) of Supply Sergeant (1821) at the time of his discharge. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 for the period of 15 July 1951 through 21 June 1954 should be corrected to show: a. that he held the rank of staff sergeant and MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011172

    Original file (20110011172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He adds his military records should show the following awards: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) [2nd Award] * Meritorious Service Medal (awarded upon retirement) * Army Commendation Medal (4th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) [2nd Award] * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation [2nd Award] * Korea...