Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011809
Original file (20080011809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        12 FEBRUARY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011809 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be reimbursed for an expense incurred in the storage of his household goods (HHG) and privately owned vehicle (POV) while deployed to Iraq for 15 months in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that at the time he was briefed by personnel at the Joint Personal Property Shipping Office - Colorado Springs (JPPSO-COS), he was told he was entitled, as a single officer, to have his HHGs and POV stored at government expense while he was deployed to Iraq.  He goes on to state that at no time did anyone ever tell him that he needed weight tickets for his HHGs and it was not until he returned from deployment and took his HHGs out of storage that he discovered he would not be reimbursed for the costs he incurred to store his HHGs without weight receipts. 

3.  The applicant provides a letter explaining his application, a copy of an electronic mail (e-mail) indicating that reimbursement was not authorized without weight tickets, a copy of his DD Form 1351-2 (Travel Voucher or Subvoucher), a memorandum from the JPPSO-COS indicating that the applicant is authorized actual reimbursement of $2,029.00, a copy of a Nontemporary Storage (NTS) Estimate Calculator, two memoranda for record from the applicant's commander, a copy of his deployment orders, a copy of his rental agreement and transaction register for a storage unit, and a copy of his weight estimate. 



CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, a single chief warrant officer two aviator, while serving at Fort Carson, Colorado, received orders deploying his unit to a temporary change of station in Iraq, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom on or about 22 August 2006.

2.  On 1 July 2006, the applicant entered into a rental agreement with a self-storage facility in Fountain, Colorado, to store his personal property on a month to month basis.  He paid the rental payments on the unit from July 2006 to 29 November 2007. 

3.  In January 2008, the applicant submitted his DD Form 1351-2 for reimbursement of the NTS costs and his request was denied because he did not provide weight tickets for his HHGs.

4.  The memoranda provided by the commander indicate the applicant was authorized storage of his HHGs at government expense during his deployment.  They also indicate the Soldiers of his unit were given a JPPSO-COS briefing in July 2006 and they were informed to have a contract from the storage facility and invoices of monies paid through the deployment period.  No instructions were given to produce weight tickets for the goods stored.

5.  On 17 March 2008, an official (Air Force Lieutenant Colonel) of the JPPSO-COS authored a memorandum to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) indicating that the applicant was authorized actual reimbursement for $2,029.00.

6.  On 20 May 2008, officials at the Transportation Branch Installation Management Command, West Region, Rock Island, Illinois, dispatched an e-mail indicating there were no provisions for reimbursement without weight receipts and advised the applicant to apply to this Board.

7.  In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G1, which recommends that the Board direct payment for the applicant's estimated weight of 8,215 pounds of HHGs.  Officials at that agency opined that in their opinion, if properly briefed, a reasonably prudent person would have provided the required weight tickets for reimbursement.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and he concurred with the opinion as written. 



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While it appears that there was some confusion as to what was required to be reimbursed for NTS of HHG for single Soldiers deploying, it serves no useful purpose at this time to expend any further effort to determine who said what to whom or when.

2.  The bottom line in this case is that the Soldier was entitled to storage of his HHGs at government expense while he was deployed and he paid the costs of the storage from his own personal funds during the time he was deployed.

3.  Accordingly, he is entitled, at the very least, to be reimbursed for the amount of funds he actually expended for the costs of storing his HHGs, which appears to be $2,029.00. 

4.  Therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to grant the applicant an exception to policy and allow payment of his actual storage costs without regard to weight tickets or to accept his weight estimate of 8,215 pounds, if that is necessary for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service to pay his claim. 

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was granted an exception to policy to allow his claim for reimbursement of HHG storage without regard to actual weight receipts and by 


paying him the actual amount of funds expended for the costs of HHG storage in the amount of $2,029.00, based on an estimated weight of 8,215 pounds. 
      
      
      
      
      _______ _ XXX  _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011809



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011809



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026099

    Original file (20100026099.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The member rents normal types of rental vehicles, equipment, moving aids, and packing material and the member performs all labor for the move. The evidence of record shows the applicant was authorized to perform a PPM from Fort Richardson to Fort Carson. It is reasonable to presume that had the applicant actually performed the move himself, without the aid of ABF, there would not have been an issue with his claim and he would have been entitled to the advance payment, as well as his full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003141

    Original file (20120003141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 March 2011, DFAS sent a letter to the applicant's home of record address in Lake Worth, FL, notifying him that records in the Travel Division showed he had received monies from the U.S. Government for his move as an advance under travel orders, dated 8 March 2010. e. A DD Form 1351-2, dated 23 November 2011, whereon he indicated he had received a previous government advance in the amount of $5,510.30 and he claimed he had incurred a rental vehicle expense in the amount of $2,563.00 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005660

    Original file (20140005660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a DD Form 2278, dated 20 July 2004, which shows the estimated cost of his move was $3,778.25. He provided a letter he sent to DFAS, dated 9 May 2013, wherein he stated that he had completed all the necessary steps required of him when he completed the PPM. As specified in the JFTR and confirmed by DFAS, the minimum documents required to file for reimbursement of actual expenses for a PPM are a DD Form 2278, certified weight tickets, travel orders, and a completed DD Form 1351-2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006328

    Original file (20120006328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * as directed by permanent change of station (PCS) orders, he was required to move from Fort Carson to Fort Leonard Wood * he requested a PPM instead of having the government move his household goods (HHG) * as a requirement for claiming travel expenses, he had his moving truck weighed full near Kansas City, MO * at one point during his family's travels to Fort Leonard Wood, he stopped to assist his wife with the care of their then 3-month old daughter * while assisting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026758

    Original file (20100026758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reimbursement for the personally-procured move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG), based on 95 percent (%) of the Government Constructed Cost (GCC) and in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), and that the estimated gross incentive (95% reimbursement estimate) cited on his DD Form 2278 (Application for Do It Yourself (DITY) Move and Counseling Checklist), dated 25 January 2010, be used instead of the estimated gross incentive cited on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002767

    Original file (20110002767.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted a DD Form 2278, which included the statement "No incentives will be paid without acceptable weight tickets and other required documents" and also he was counseled on his entitlements and responsibilities and contains the following entries in: a. item f (Number of Miles) "325"; b. item 7 (Entitlements): (1) 7b (DITY moved authorized from) Leesville, LA to Fort Hood, TX; and (2) 7c (Installation Transportation Officer/Transportation Management Office (ITO/TMO) provided with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000182

    Original file (20090000182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states a reasonable person would use the weight ticket filed for her July 2008 move from IN to AZ as a substitute for the weight ticket she was unable to obtain in August 2008. When the applicant presented the local transportation office with the paperwork and receipts for her PPM move, there were no weight tickets for her HHG. After the applicantÂ’s chain of command intervened on her behalf, the transportation office allowed if she would reload her HHG and weight them out, they would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006637

    Original file (20150006637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reimbursement for his personally procured move (PPM) move from Fort Huachuca, AZ, to Fort Campbell, KY. 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving at Fort Huachuca when he was issued PCS orders in December 2014 reassigning him to Fort Campbell. On 19 December 2014, he was properly counseled at Fort Huachuca on the PPM program to include his entitlements, his responsibilities, and the documentation required to submit a claim for a PPM move.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014370

    Original file (20130014370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * when he turned in his PPM paperwork, he did not turn in the empty weight ticket for one of the two trucks he used to complete his PPM * he had the appropriate weight tickets for the truck he rented to move his professional gear, but not for the truck he rented as his main moving truck, which he used to move his HHG * neither he nor the transportation official who reviewed his case prior to submission realized the error * instead of calling and requesting the empty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006950

    Original file (20090006950.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, her mobilization orders state she was authorized to store her POV at Government expense; however, when she turned in her travel voucher, she was denied reimbursement for storage of her POV. He states that the applicant's 14 December 2007 active duty orders authorized the storage of HHG/POV at Government expense, and upon receipt of these orders, she stored her POV at her home of record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...