Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011419
Original file (20080011419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080011419 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her reentry eligibility (RE) code of RE-4 be upgraded to RE-3. 

2.  The applicant states that when she was applying for enlistment, her Army Recruiter told her that her separation document (DD Form 214) had the wrong RE code.  The applicant stated she has seen similar discharges with an RE code of RE-3.  The applicant states that she was told by "JAG" when she was being processed for discharge that although she was discharged with a general discharge under honorable conditions she would be allowed to return to Active Duty after a period of 2 years, if she reapplied for enlistment.  She feels that her chain of command had failed her by allowing her to sign her way out of the Army. The RE-4 is the only thing standing in her way of continuing to serve her country.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows she enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 August 2000.  She completed the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 88K (Watercraft Operator).   

3.  On 3 December 2003, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for wrongful use of marijuana.

4.  On 15 October 2004, for the second time the applicant accepted NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ, for wrongful use of marijuana.

5.  On 18 November 2004, the applicant's commander recommended her for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation), Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2) for misconduct.  

6.  She was advised of the rights available to her and the effects of a discharge under honorable conditions.  She was also informed that she would be ineligible to apply for enlistment in the United States Army for a period of two years after discharge, and that she may make application to the Army Discharge Review Board or the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for upgrading; however, she acknowledged she realized that an act of consideration by either board does not imply that her discharge would be upgraded.  She waived personal appearance before an administrative separation board, and did not submit any statement in her own behalf.

7.  On 18 November 2004, her commander recommended that she receive a general discharge and her service be characterized as under honorable conditions.

8.  On 1 December 2004, the applicant's commander's recommendation for separation was approved by the appropriate authority.

9.  On 28 January 2005, the applicant was given a general discharge from active duty for misconduct.  She was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JKK and assigned an RE code of RE-4.  She had completed  
4 years, 5 months, and 14 days of Net Active Service This Period.


10.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of this regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.

11.  Table 3-1 (U.S. Army reentry eligibility codes), of Army Regulation 601-210 states that an RE-4 applies to persons separated from last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.

12.  AR 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designated Codes), Table 2-3, states that the SPD code JKK denotes involuntary discharge by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse).

13.  The Army Human Resources Command publishes a cross-reference of SPD and RE codes.  This cross-reference shows that an SPD code of JKK is assigned an RE code of RE-4.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of the regulation deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and provides that individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated prior to their normal expiration of term of service.  Individuals in pay grades E-5 and above must be processed for separation upon discovery of a drug offense.  Those in pay grades below E-5 may also be processed after a first drug offense and must be processed for separation after a second offense.  The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that her RE-4 be upgraded to RE-3. 

2.  There is no evidence or indication that there was an error or injustice, which caused the applicant to be discharged for misconduct.

3.  Since the applicant was properly discharged, there is no reason to change a correctly assigned RE code.

4.  The applicant's record contains no evidence to show that "JAG" told her that although she was discharged with a general discharge under honorable conditions she would be allowed to return to Active Duty after a period of 2 years, 
if she reapplied for enlistment.  Evidence shows that the applicant acknowledged she could make application to the Army Discharge Review Board or the Army Board for Correction of Military Records for upgrading.  However, she realized that an act of consideration by either board does not imply that her discharge would be upgraded.

5.  While the applicant was told in her waiver statement that she would be ineligible to apply for enlistment for 2 years after discharge, this statement did not state that she would be accepted for enlistment after 2 years.  That decision has to be made at the time of application for enlistment based on the needs of the Army.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must satisfactorily show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011419



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080011419



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003341

    Original file (AR20130003341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 26 August 2008, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and an RE code of 4. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017195C070206

    Original file (20050017195C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation document (DD Form 214) she was issued at the time confirms she was separated under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c (2), Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of misconduct after completing a total of 5 years, 6 months and 6 days of active military service. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no indication that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004025

    Original file (20080004025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It has been over 5 years since she was on active duty and would like to be given another chance. On 16 September 2002, the applicant’s commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, for commission of a serious offense [drug abuse]. The SPD code of JKK was the appropriate code for the applicant based upon the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 14, for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021591

    Original file (20090021591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * a military correspondence course transcript * a Certificate of Completion for Anti-Terrorism Level 1 Awareness Training * a Certificate of Completion for Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention Training (ADAPT) * a Certificate of Attendance for an Alcohol and Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) * a self-authored statement * three character reference letters * a portion of a response from a Member of Congress (MOC) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. However, her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018110

    Original file (20080018110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. There was no evidence of mental illness and she was administratively cleared for administrative action deemed appropriate. Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE Code 4 as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers for this reason.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011686

    Original file (20100011686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a general discharge. On 15 December 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c for commission of a serious offense and directed that the applicant receive a General Discharge Certificate. The DD Form 214 also shows her character of service was general, under honorable conditions; the separation authority was Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004222

    Original file (20070004222.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of her general discharge on 15 August 2006. The regulation shows that the separation program designator (SPD) "JKK", as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "misconduct, commission of a serious offense, abuse of illegal drugs" and the authority for discharge under this SPD is "Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)." The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010881

    Original file (AR20130010881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a self-authored statement and her DD Form 214 for service under current review. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, the Army Discharge Review Board would considered the applicant for a possible upgrade as instructed, in pertinent part, by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28, which stipulates that a request for review...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012042

    Original file (20120012042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 August 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense and directed her service be uncharacterized. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such are...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002135

    Original file (AR20130002135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable, and a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 23 January 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission a of...