Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010776
Original file (20080010776.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        9 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010776 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 March 1988 be corrected to show he enlisted on 15 October 1986 and was discharged on 1 April 1990.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he enlisted in the Army on 15 October 1986 and was discharged on 1 April 1990; however, his DD Form 214 only shows four months of service.  He contends that he was not debriefed, that he did not receive his discharge papers, and that he served four years at Fort Gordon.  He also states that he served four years on active duty, that he served three years in the Army National Guard (1 June 1990 to 14 October 1993), and that he served two years in the Army Reserve. 

3.  The applicant provides a Department of Veterans Affairs document and a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 March 1988.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s enlistment contract shows he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 15 October 1987 for a period of 8 years.  He was ordered to active duty on 27 October 1987 for training and was released from active duty on 18 March 1988.  

3.  Item 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) on the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 March 1988 shows the entry, “87 10 27.”  Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) on his DD Form 214 shows the entry, 
“88 03 18.”

4.  On 1 April 1990, the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). 

5.  The applicant’s NGB [National Guard Bureau] Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he enlisted on 15 October 1987 and was discharged on 1 April 1990.   

6.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in the Army National Guard until October 1993.   

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty.  

2.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant’s contention that he enlisted in the Army on 15 October 1986 and was discharged on 1 April 1990.  Evidence of record shows that he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 
15 October 1987 and that he was ordered to active duty on 27 October 1987 for training.  He was released from active duty for training on 18 March 1988.  He was discharged from the Army National Guard on 1 April 1990 and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training).  Since the applicant’s active duty service (27 October 1987 through 18 March 1988) is properly reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 March 1988, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xx____  __xx____  __xx____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ xxxx_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010776



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010776



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003264

    Original file (20140003264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Humanitarian Service Medal * Arkansas Emergency Service Ribbon * Army Superior Unit Award * Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) C (recruiter) 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * Army Achievement Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008463

    Original file (20080008463.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with the period ending 17 May 1991, to show award of the Army Commendation Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Reserve Medal (AFRM) with “M” Device, the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia), the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. The applicant provides his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008712

    Original file (20080008712.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows he completed 2 years, 5 months, and 18 days total service this period. His Army National Guard Annual Statement shows an additional 16 days of active duty during the retirement year ending 17 December 2002. While again in the Army National Guard, the applicant served on active duty from 7 February 2003 through 4 June 2004, which is a period of 1 year, 3 months, and 28 days active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021501

    Original file (20090021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon (2nd Award), and the Armed Forces Reserve Medal with “Hourglass” and “M” device. With respect to award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal, the evidence of record shows the applicant’s immediate commander awarded him the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal for service from 10 December 1986 through 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005012

    Original file (20080005012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Another platoon sergeant stated what when it came to performing his job as a Chaparral Squad Leader and caring for the needs of his Soldiers, the applicant(‘s performance) was of the highest standards. Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. He provided numerous statements of support with his appeal indicating he daily demonstrated his Soldier skills; that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004211

    Original file (20080004211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 January 1988, the applicant’s commander signed an elimination packet on the applicant for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14 for misconduct – patterns of misconduct. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a soldier discharged under this chapter. Based on these facts, the applicant’s service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel which are required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021077

    Original file (20130021077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the entries in item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods ending 24 August 1987 and 23 June 1988. It stated that personnel officers were to use any available records to complete the DD Form 214. The record clearly shows that the applicant had active service prior to serving as an AGR Soldier from 6 June 1986 to 24 August 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000340

    Original file (20120000340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 30 March 1992, to show award of the Valorous Unit Award. As a new issue, he requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214, for the period ending 30 March 1992, to show all his awards, training, military occupational specialties (MOSs), and various schools. The evidence of record further shows he was awarded MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03097909C070212

    Original file (03097909C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 April 1987 the applicant's commanding officer requested funds for incapacitation pay for the applicant for the period 7 March 1987 to 6 June 1987. In an 18 November 1987 memorandum for the Adjutant General's Department, Texas Army National Guard, the applicant's commanding officer stated that the unit had been attempting to board the applicant for a double bypass on 22 December 1985, and that the applicant had not attended unit drills since 17 November 1985 due to his medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012530

    Original file (20120012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 2 states: * Items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank/grade held at the time of separation * Item 12h shows the effective date of pay grade * Item 12c (Net Active Service During This Period) shows the total active duty completed between the date entered on active duty and the date separated from active duty * Item 13 shows awards and decorations * Item 14 shows formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the...