Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010608
Original file (20080010608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        21 AUGUST 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010608 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he qualifies for award of the NDSM and the GCMDL for his honorable service during the period of
12 September 1962 to 10 September 1965.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on 12 September 1962 for a period of 3 years and assignment in the Army security Agency (ASA).  He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and his advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Devens, Massachusetts.

3.  Upon completion of his AIT he was transferred to Kagnew Station, Asmara, Ethiopia on 8 September 1963 for duty as a morse code interceptor.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 7 October 1963.

4.  He departed Ethiopia on emergency leave on 26 February 1964 and was subsequently reassigned to Fort Dix for duty as a clerk typist in a training company.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 15 July 1965.

5.  The applicant’s Installation Clearance Record shows that the commander rated the applicant’s conduct and efficiency as being “Excellent.”   There is no indication that the commander took any action to deny the applicant the award of the GCMDL prior to his release from active duty (REFRAD).  Additionally, all of the applicant’s conduct and efficiency ratings were rated as “Excellent.” 

6.  On 10 September 1965, the applicant was honorably REFRAD at Fort Dix due to the expiration of his term of service (ETS).  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of total active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he received no decorations, awards, or badges.

7.  A review of his records show that he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M-1 Rifle Bar upon completion of his basic training at Fort Dix.

8.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, and 1 January 1961 through 14 August 1974, inclusive. 

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  
   


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served during a period in which the NDSM was authorized and therefore he is entitled to be awarded the NDSM for his service. 

2.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 12 September 1962 through 10 September 1965.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record shows that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and is void of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.  

3.  Additionally, the applicant was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Badge with M-1 Rifle Bar, which was omitted from his DD Form 214 at the time of his REFRAD.  Accordingly, it should be added at this time.  

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 12 September 1962 through 10 September 1965, while serving in the rank of SP4; by awarding him the NDSM; and by adding his award of the Marksman Marksmanship Badge with M-1 Rifle Bar to his records.



      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010608



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010608



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008740

    Original file (20080008740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his service in the Dominican Republic in 1965 and his awards of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), the Combat Infantryman Badge, and any other awards he is entitled to as a result of his service in the Dominican Republic. Additionally, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was entitled to award of the NDSM and it appears that he should have been awarded the GCMDL for the period of 20 June 1962 to 18 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020273

    Original file (20140020273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and that they be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge from Active Duty). Accordingly, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 10 September 1962 to 30 August 1965 and it should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001237

    Original file (20080001237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and any other awards to which he is entitled and were not listed on his DD Form 214. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 21 June 1965 through 12 June 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023833

    Original file (20100023833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records show that he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004151

    Original file (20090004151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and was transferred to Fort Gordon, Georgia to attend his advanced individual training as an MP on 22 August 1960. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the GCMDL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005103

    Original file (20080005103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an infantry company in Vietnam, that alone does not entitle him to award of the CIB. However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it was determined that the applicant should have received the GCMDL for his service from 28 August 1969 through 3 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004825C070205

    Original file (20060004825C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his three awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), two awards of the Purple Heart, and his award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). On 6 January 1966, he was transferred with his unit to Vietnam. A review of his records as well as the Vietnam Casualty Listing fails to show that the applicant was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart or that he was wounded a second time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006206

    Original file (20080006206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Good Conduct Medal, and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Good Conduct Medal, a Letter of Commendation, and completion of the Explosives and Demolitions Course. The applicant's records contain orders awarding him marksmanship badges which either do not appear, or incorrectly appear on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010854

    Original file (20090010854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and any other awards and decorations he may have been eligible for at the time of his separation. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 February 1971 through 20 November 1972, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024773

    Original file (20110024773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he...