Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010587
Original file (20080010587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  15 October 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010587 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show that he was released from active duty on 2 July 2007.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served on active duty until 2 July 2007 and that his DD Form 214 needs to be corrected to show that date. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), and his active duty orders with amendment, in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of his application, the applicant was a sergeant (SGT), pay grade E-5, in the United States Army Reserve.

2.  Orders A-07-618394, United States Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia, dated 19 July 2006, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Noble Eagle.  He was ordered to active duty effective 
20 August 2006, for a period of 154 days with an end date of 20 January 2007.

3.  Orders A-07-618394A01, United States Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia, dated 7 December 2006, amended Orders A-07-618394 to change his period of active duty from 154 days to 274 days and his ending date from 20 January 2007 to 20 May 2007.
4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows in Item 12a (Record of Service – Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) that he entered active duty on 20 August 2004 and Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) shows he was released from active duty on 2 July 2007.  His DD Form 214 also shows in Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) that he completed 2 years, 9 months, and 1 day of creditable active duty during this period.

5.  On 24 July 2007, a correction to his DD Form 214 was issued.  It changed his date of separation from 2 July 2007 to 20 May 2007.  It did not correct his date of entry or net active service for this period of service. 

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that for Item 12 (Record of Service), use extreme care in completing this block since post-service benefits, final pay, retirement credit, and so forth are based on this information.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows that the applicant was ordered to active duty effective 20 August 2006 for 154 days.  His orders were subsequently amended to increase his active duty service requirement to 274 days, making his release date from 20 January 2007 to 20 May 2007.  There are no available orders showing that this period of active duty was further extended to 2 July 2007. 

2.  Furthermore, the applicant has not provided any evidence showing that he was retained on active duty beyond 20 May 2007. 

3.  The evidence shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was issued with a release date of 2 July 2007 that was subsequently changed to read 20 May 2007.  This change is supported by an amendment to the original orders and a corresponding DD Form 215 to correct his DD Form 214.

4.  In view of the above, there does not appear to be any error or injustice with regard to the applicant’s date of release from active duty.  

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_____________
      	 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010587



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017612

    Original file (20100017612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states that item 12 shows the record of service. Item 12a (Date Entered AD This Period) shows the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of this DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of records shows the applicant was ordered to active duty at his home station (Coraopolis, PA) on 20 August 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019406

    Original file (20090019406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of her 31 July 2009 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show an entry date of 30 August 2006. The instructions for item 12a are to enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of a DD Form 214 for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued. The evidence of record contains permanent orders which show the applicant was ordered to active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018986

    Original file (20130018986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. he was not authorized separation pay due to an incorrect calculation of his active duty service; b. Fort Myer and Fort Belvoir Army Finance officials informed him that the time to correct his pay record expired and advised him to apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR); and c. he has orders confirming he met the total time in service requirement thereby establishing his entitlement to full separation pay. Item 12a (Record of Service – Date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019534

    Original file (20120019534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 January 2009 to show he entered active duty on 20 November 2006 instead of 27 January 2003. He provides: * Four DD Forms 214, for the periods ending 2 June 1987, 23 July 2005, 18 January 2009, and 9 August 2010 * Orders assigning him to active duty and active duty for training (ADT) * Orders releasing him from active duty CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015059

    Original file (20070015059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070015059 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he knows what he did was wrong and that he needed to be punished for what he did. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020052

    Original file (20080020052.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be amended to show that he completed 730 days of involuntary mobilization under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302 and that he was voluntarily mobilized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12301(d) for any days in excess of 730. As a result, USAHRC, Alexandria, Orders A-08-621585, dated 17 August 2006, which ordered the applicant to active duty under the voluntary provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021224

    Original file (20090021224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. retroactive promotion to chief warrant officer four (CW4) on 6 November 2007; b. amendment of active duty orders for the period 6 November 2007 to 11 March 2008 to recover retroactive pay and allowances; and c. correction of item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), and item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending dated 11 March 2008,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009553

    Original file (20080009553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his mobilization orders, two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his CO-ADOS request, his AIP request, electronic mail correspondence, a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Military Leave and Earnings Statement (LES), and excerpts from the Department of the Army Personnel Planning Guidance as evidence in support of this application. This correspondence shows, in effect, that the applicant informed the military pay...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008962

    Original file (20080008962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Army Reserve Personnel Command, Saint Louis, Missouri, Orders M-03-200323, dated 1 March 2002, show the applicant was involuntarily ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. United States Army Human Resources Command, Saint Louis, Missouri, Orders A-02-503247, dated 3 February 2005, show the applicant was voluntarily ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. The record shows that the applicant was voluntarily mobilized under the provisions of 10 U.S.C.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019921

    Original file (20080019921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be issued a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods of active service from 23 September 2005 to 31 January 2006 and from 1 February 2006 to 30 July 2006. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. ...