Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010558
Original file (20080010558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       23 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010558 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that although he received the orders for a Good Conduct Medal, he never received the actual medal.  He would like to have his records corrected and to receive the medal.

3.  The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214; Headquarters, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey General Orders Number 4, dated 19 February 1971; Headquarters US Army Personnel Center, Fort Hamilton, Brooklyn, New York Special Orders 30, dated 12 February 1971; Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administrative Center, St. Louis, Missouri  Letter Orders Number 02-1064223, dated 26 February 1975; an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 1 March 1975; and a Picatinny Arsenal Certificate of Achievement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 
provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 26 March 1969, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 01B (Electrical Engineering Assistant).

3.  Headquarters, US Army Training Center, Armor, Fort Knox, Kentucky, Special Orders Number 127, dated 7 May 1969, awarded the applicant the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

4.  Headquarters, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey General Orders Number 4, dated 19 February 1971, awarded the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period from 26 March 1969 through 25 March 1971.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 25 March 1971 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining military service obligation.  His DD Form 214 lists his authorized awards as the National Defense Service Medal and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (enlisted Qualification Record) lists his authorized awards as the Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  There is no indication that the applicant had any foreign service.

7.  Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administrative Center, St. Louis, Missouri Letter Orders 02-1064223, dated 26 February 1975, discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 1 March 1975.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's award of the Good Conduct Medal was inadvertently omitted from his DD Form 214.  It is appropriate to correct the record to reflect this award and to issue him the appropriate medal set. 

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ____X__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that in addition to the awards listed on his DD Form 214, the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal.

2.  It would also be appropriate at this time to issue the applicant the Good Conduct Medal award set he claims he had not received.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010558



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010558



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014380

    Original file (20080014380.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 March 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014380 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of a second Army Meritorious Unit Commendation. In pertinent part, it states an oak leaf cluster is authorized for wear for each additional award of the Presidential Unit Citation (Army), Joint Meritorious Unit Award, Valorous Unit Award, Meritorious Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014008

    Original file (20110014008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings; and b item 41 (Awards and Decorations) that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, Air Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, one oversea service bar, and the Bronze Star Medal. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012734

    Original file (20060012734.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the award of the Bronze Star Medal with “V” (for Valor) Device, and any unit citations that he is eligible for. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued to him at the time of his release from active duty shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017844

    Original file (20110017844.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) at the time of the applicant's separation processing, based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084952C070212

    Original file (2003084952C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is the Board’s feeling that he was not awarded the Good Conduct Medal due to administrative oversight and he is therefore entitled to this award for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972 and to have this award shown on his DD Form 214. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for the period 17 March 1971 through 14 April 1972, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and 3 bronze service stars to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011720

    Original file (20090011720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 18 March 1969 through 17 March 1971 and to correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004772C070206

    Original file (20050004772C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214, issued at the time of his retirement, shows in Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster, Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal with Second Oak Leaf Cluster, Good Conduct Medal (Sixth Award), National Defense Service Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with 1 silver service star and 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106957C070208

    Original file (2004106957C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Yolanda Maldonado | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Korea Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge M-60 machinegun. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082395C070215

    Original file (2002082395C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show all the training he completed during the period 27 December 1968 through 26 January 1971. He also requests correction of his records to show the Purple Heart, the Air Medal with Numeral "31", the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Parachutist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019972

    Original file (20100019972.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. ...