Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010449
Original file (20080010449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        04 SEPTEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010449 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:


1.  The applicant requests, as an exception to policy, that his debt as a result of recoupment of his United States Army Reserve (USAR) enlistment bonus be cancelled.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that having to repay the debt would result in a financial hardship.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application copies of electronic mail from Army officials regarding his enlistment bonus; a copy of a memorandum from his battalion commander, addressed through the Commander, Military Intelligence Readiness Command, Fort Belvoir, VA to the Commander, USAR Command, Fort McPherson, GA dated 15 April 2008, requesting an exception to policy for recoupment of his reenlistment bonus; a copy of his USAR Enlistment Contract and Addendum; a copy of his Selected Reserve Incentive Program – USAR Reenlistment Bonus Addendum; a copy of his Student Loan Repayment Program Addendum; a copy of his Reenlistment Eligibility Worksheet; a copy of his Enlisted Qualification Record; a copy of his Reenlistment Bonus Control Worksheet; and a copy of an indebtedness notice from the Defense Finance and Accounting Services, dated 22 February 2008, showing that as of that date he owed a balance of $15,583.75.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 14 March 2000, the applicant enlisted in the USAR in Tampa, Florida, for 8 years, in the pay grade of E-1.  He successfully completed his training as a combat engineer.

2.  After completing approximately 7 years, 1 month, and 16 days of total service in the USAR, the applicant reenlisted in the USAR for 6 years on 30 April 2007.

3.  Annex A of the applicant's Enlistment Contract shows that he reenlisted for 6 years, for a bonus amount of $15,000 and that the lump sum payment of the total bonus amount would be received upon providing proof of contract and qualification at the time of the request for payment.  Annex A also shows that if he accepted a permanent military technician or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position where a membership in the Selected Reserve is a condition of employment, his bonus would be recouped if he had not satisfactorily served 6 months or more in the Selected Reserve service under his agreement before accepting a permanent military technician or AGR position.

4.  On 18 May 2006, the applicant was notified that his AGR online application had been screened for eligibility and approved for entry into the AGR program.  He was informed that his name had been placed on the consideration list and would remain on the list for 1 year.

5.  On 9 July 2007, Order R-07-785147 was published by the United States Army Human Resources Command, ordering the applicant to active duty in AGR status for 3 years, effective 23 July 2007.

6.  On 15 April 2008, the applicant's battalion commander forwarded a memorandum to the Commander, USAR Command, Fort McPherson, Georgia, requesting an exception to policy for the recoupment of the applicant's reenlistment bonus.  In his memorandum, the battalion commander stated that on 23 July 2007, the applicant reported for duty, accepting an AGR position with the 345th Military Intelligence Battalion.  He stated that prior to the applicant’s acceptance, the applicant contacted his retention noncommissioned officer and informed him that he was being offered an AGR position and wanted to know if accepting the position would affect his reenlistment bonus.  The applicant was informed that since he was not changing his military occupational specialty, and because he was remaining a Soldier in the Army Reserve, it would not affect his reenlistment bonus.  The battalion commander went on to state that the applicant asked his leadership about this issue and he was informed that there should not be any problems with him accepting an AGR position.  The battalion commander 

states that the applicant was encouraged to accept the position to better his career and family life and that he had gone through the proper channels to ensure that there would be no issues with receiving his bonus.  The battalion commander concluded by stating that the applicant was told by everyone he asked that there would be no issues with him receiving his bonus.

7.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained on 10 July 2008, from the Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor, Office of the Deputy chief of Staff, G-1, who recommended that relief be granted in the applicant's case.  The Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor stated that although Soldiers are responsible to fully understand the conditions of reenlistment bonuses and Career Counselor's are required to counsel Soldiers on the terms and conditions of incentives, his experience is that many Soldiers do not take the time to read reenlistment documents and many counselors do not conduct the required counseling sessions.  The Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor also stated that the AGR management division at the Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri should also screen potential AGR candidates and caution them on the loss of bonus payments and potential recoupment actions if the termination and recoupment conditions are not met before ordering Soldiers to active duty.

8.  On 11 July 2008, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for concurrence and/or comments.  On 16 July 2008 the applicant indicated that he concurred with the information contained therein and did not submit any additional comments.

9.  Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness for Enlisted Members) states that the Secretary of the Army may remit or cancel a Soldier's unpaid debts to the United States before or at the time of his or her honorable discharge if such action is in the best interest of the United States.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The issue in this case is whether or not the applicant is entitled to the reenlistment bonus that he was furnished as a condition of his reenlistment in the USAR.

2.  Annex A of the applicant’s USAR Enlistment Contract also shows that if he accepted a permanent military technician or Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position where a membership in the Selected Reserve is a condition of 



employment, his bonus would be recouped if he had not satisfactorily served 6 months or more in the Selected Reserve service under his agreement before accepting a permanent military technician or AGR position.

3.  Notwithstanding the advisory opinion from the Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor, Office of the Deputy chief of Staff, G-1, the terms of recoupment of his reenlistment bonus are clearly stated on his Enlistment Contract.  Unfortunately, the applicant served only 2 months of his USAR enlistment contract prior to accepting a position in the AGR program.  

4.  Additionally, the advisory opinion states that Soldiers are responsible to fully understand the conditions of reenlistment bonuses.  The fact that that the Senior Army Reserve Career Counselor states that it has been his experience that many Soldiers do not take the time to read reenlistment documents has been noted.  However, it does not relieve the applicant of his responsibility to do so and the statement is purely speculation at this point.  

5.  The applicant is not entitled to the reenlistment bonus that he received as he did not fulfill the terms of his Enlistment Contract.  Failure to recoup the reenlistment bonus from the applicant would create an advantage for him that is not afforded other AGR members in similar situations.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

7.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010449





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010449



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005736

    Original file (20090005736.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 February 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005736 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Notwithstanding the recommendation contained in the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 advisory opinion, the terms of recoupment of his reenlistment bonus are clearly stated in Annex A of the applicant's enlistment document, which provided that he would lose his eligibility for the bonus if he accepted a military technician or AGR position before completing 6 months...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010962

    Original file (20090010962 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self Authored Statement; DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document); DA Form 3540 (Selected Reserve Incentive Program-United States Army Reserve (USAR) Reenlistment Bonus Addendum); Request for Exception to Policy Troop Program Unit (TPU) Reenlistment Bonus Recoupment, dated 30 December 2008; Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command Letter, dated 4 May 2009; Congressional Inquiry, dated 11 March 2009;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013888

    Original file (20090013888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013888 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that an Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 Memorandum changed the policy governing bonus recoupment allowing Soldiers who transferred from the Selected Reserve (SELRES) to the Army Guard Reserve (AGR) on or after 8 April 2005 to be granted a waiver for the recoupment of reenlistment bonuses. The Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1 Memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011615

    Original file (20110011615.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 6 years for the SLRP on 13 July 2001. He provides the following: * USAR Command (USARC) Form 28-R (Notice of Indebtedness), dated 1 November 2006 * DD Form 2789 (Waiver/Remission of Indebtedness Application), dated 23 January 2007, with a self-authored statement * enlistment/reenlistment documents * information paper, dated 14 November 2006, subject: Waiver and Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness * extract of Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013240

    Original file (20130013240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it is true he was not DMOSQ at the time of his extension * he was DMOSQ by 2 May 2007, well before his 12 July 2007 contract effective date * regarding acceptance of the AGR position, policy has since changed to allow a Soldier to retain incentives * he entered into a contract trusting he was eligible for the REB and SLRP * per the terms he had fully performed his end of the contract * he would not have agreed to the extension if not for the REB and SLRP 5. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019174

    Original file (20130019174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A document generated by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Information Management and Reporting Center shows the applicant's bonus was required to be recouped based on his acceptance of an AGR position prior to the start of his reenlistment contract; therefore, the contract should have been terminated at the time of acceptance. While in-processing into the AGR Program, he discussed his concern about receiving the bonus with his FLL, MSG T____. Notwithstanding the recommendation contained in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017938

    Original file (20130017938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides and his records contain a PSEB Addendum, dated 5 December 2008, wherein it stated, in part: a. The G-1 official stated his PSEB contract was terminated as of 22 October 2011 when he voluntarily moved to a different MOS than the MOS he contracted for and out of an MTOE unit into a TDA unit. The evidence of record shows the applicant did contract for 6 years in MOS 11B in an MTOE unit and from 22 October 2011 to 3 November 2013, he failed to do so, even if at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012966

    Original file (20120012966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 29 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120012966 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with her appointment, she signed a Written Agreement – OAB Acknowledgement wherein she agreed, in part: (1) to accept an appointment as an officer in the armed forces to serve in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) in a critical officer skill that was designated for bonus entitlement by the Secretary of the Army and (2) she was not accepting an appointment as an officer serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013225

    Original file (20130013225.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His REB Bonus Addendum, dated 27 February 2009, shows: a. he extended for a bonus in the amount of $15,000.00. To date, he has served over 5 years of this 6-year reenlistment, he deployed to Afghanistan, and he recently reenlisted for a 4-year period. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention his contract stated he would receive the total amount of the REB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003171

    Original file (20110003171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110003171 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 1 July 2009, the USARC Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G-1, replied to the applicant's request for an exception to policy to cancel her debt resulting from her reenlistment bonus indicating: a. she reenlisted on 8 September 2006 for a 6-year $15,000.00 reenlistment bonus while serving as a military technician, b. at the time of her reenlistment, the applicant was...