Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010229
Original file (20080010229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010229 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of his request that the incident report for a HMMWV (military vehicle) crash be corrected from showing that it was accidently caused, to that it was intentionally caused.  The applicant also requests award of the Purple Heart.  

2.  The applicant states that he was the driver of the HMMWV involved in the incident.  He sustained a broken clavicle along with head and neck injuries.  He adds one of the crewman on the HMMWV died and was awarded the Purple Heart.

3.  The applicant provides a redacted copy of the Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Agent Report which shows that when a Iraqi automobile moved over to let the convoy go by, the civilian vehicle made a hard left turn and struck the left side of the HMMWV, causing it to turn over.

4.  The applicant also submits a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080005938 on 8 May 2008.


2.  The applicant provides new evidence, which requires that the Board reconsider his request.

3.  In the applicant’s first request to the Board, he included a copy of the Board’s Record of Proceedings on a former service member (FSM) who died as a result of the HMMWV accident which caused the applicant’s injury.

4.  In the Board’s first consideration of the applicant’s request, the Board concluded that the applicant had not submitted anything to show that he was in a HMMWV crash or that he was injured as a result of a HMMWV crash.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the case submitted by the applicant in his first request, the Board believed that the collision, on 22 May 2005, that resulted in the death of a FSM was caused by hostile action and he was therefore entitled to award of the Purple Heart.  As a result, the Board recommended that he be posthumously awarded the Purple Heart for the incident resulting in his death.  That recommendation was approved.  However, the Board did not recommend that the accident report be changed to show that the HMMWV incident was intentional.

2.  In a subsequent explanation of the Board’s decision, it was explained that no relief other than issuance of the Purple Heart was recommended by the ABCMR or directed by the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards).  The applicant’s request to change Army records to reflect that the incident resulting in the FSM’s death was an intentional act and not an accident was noted in the Record of Proceedings, but the ABCMR did not grant relief on that claim,  Making such changes would affect records related to individuals other than the applicant and would not have been appropriate or recommended in this case.  Award of the Purple Heart was directed as an exercise of the extraordinary authority of the ABCMR to grant relief and was in keeping with the Army’s guidance for issuance of the Purple Heart:  “It is not intended that such a strict interpretation of the 




requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct result of hostile action be taken, that it would preclude the award being made to deserving personnel.”

3.  The applicant has now provided the accident report on the HMMWV incident which resulted in one soldier’s death and two soldiers injured, medical records to show he was treated for injuries incurred as a result of the HMMWV incident, and his DD Form 214.

4.  Since the Board determined that the death of the FSM in the cited case warranted the Purple Heart, then all individuals injured in the HMMWV rollover incident would also be entitled to the Purple Heart, based on the Army’s guidance for issuance of the Purple Heart:  “It is not intended that such a strict interpretation of the requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct result of hostile action be taken, that it would preclude the award being made to deserving personnel.”  Because there is no clear evidence that the accident was caused by a hostile action, this must be directed as an exercise of the ABCMR’s extraordinary authority, as it was in the case of the FSM.

5.  However, there is still insufficient evidence to warrant changing the accident report on the HMMWV rollover incident to show that it was intentionally caused.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

___X____  __X_____  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a partial amendment of the ABCMR’s decision in Docket Number AR20080005936 on 8 May 2008.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart.




2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the accident report to show the accident was intentionally caused.




      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010229



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010007

    Original file (20080010007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of his request for award of the Purple Heart and, in effect, that the incident report for a HMMWV (military vehicle) crash be corrected from showing that it was accidently caused, to that it was intentionally caused. The applicant’s request to change Army records to reflect that the incident resulting in the FSM’s death was an intentional act and not an accident was noted in the Record of Proceedings, but the ABCMR did not grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010004

    Original file (20080010004.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of his request that the incident report for a HMMWV (military vehicle) crash be corrected from showing that it was accidently caused, to that it was intentionally caused. The applicant’s request to change Army records to reflect that the incident resulting in the FSM’s death was an intentional act and not an accident was noted in the Record of Proceedings, but the ABCMR did not grant relief on that claim, Making such changes would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005938

    Original file (20080005938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 MAY 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005938 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Without medical records and the incident report in question, along with the applicant’s DD Form 214 (if applicable), there is insufficient documentation in which to grant his request for award of the Purple Heart or to change the incident report.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 200800005938

    Original file (200800005938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 MAY 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005938 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Without medical records and the incident report in question, along with the applicant’s DD Form 214, there is insufficient documentation in which to grant his request for award of the Purple Heart or to change the incident report.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005937

    Original file (20080005937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 MAY 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005937 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The ABCMR reviews a case with a presumption of regularity, that what the Army did was correct. Without medical records and the incident report in question, there is insufficient documentation in which to grant the applicant’s request to award him the Purple Heart or to change the incident report.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005936

    Original file (20080005936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the incident report for a HMMWV (military vehicle) crash be corrected from showing that it was accidently caused, to that it was intentionally caused. The ABCMR recommended awarding the Soldier the Purple Heart, but did not recommend changing the incident report to show that the incident which caused the death was intentional. Without medical records and the incident report in question, there is insufficient documentation in which to grant the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004386

    Original file (20110004386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The human remains recovered from the crash site were so limited they precluded any determination of the cause of death and the 10 April 2009 Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command J-2 Report does not address the cause of the crash. The only evidence to document the cause of the crash is the statement from Mr. Vek that he shot down the aircraft. His statement is supported by his military award for shooting down a helicopter in the location of and at the time the FSM's aircraft went missing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016455

    Original file (20100016455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In awarding him the additional awards, HRC officials considered the request for award of the Purple Heart but determined there was insufficient evidence to show the helicopter crash – and thus his injury – was the result of enemy action. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) stated the authority to award the Purple Heart was delegated to hospital commanders. The FSM's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020947

    Original file (20140020947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The author reported a vehicle being struck by an IED on 1 June 2004. The medical treatment for concussion that meets the standard of treatment necessary for award of the Purple Heart includes limitation of duty following the incident, pain medication such as acetaminophen to treat the injury, referral to a neurologist to treat the injury, and rehabilitation to treat the injury.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102653C070208

    Original file (2004102653C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated that the basic criteria for award of the Purple Heart required that it be awarded to soldiers for wounds or injuries received as a direct result of enemy action. While the statement described what happened on 21 February 1969, the major general does not state that he was present when the aircraft crashed or that he witnessed the aircraft being hit by enemy fire causing it to crash. Notwithstanding the evidence submitted by the applicant, the...