Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010160
Original file (20080010160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  2 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010160 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he did not make a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to change coverage from “spouse” to “former spouse” and a refund of all premiums paid since 4 November 1995.

2.  The applicant states that his former spouse forged his signature.

3.  The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application:

	a.  A self-authored statement, dated 21 April 2008.

	b.  Pages 1 and 4 of a 4-page Divorce Decree, dated 4 November 1994.

	c.  Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage.

	d.  DD Form 1882 (Survivor benefit Plan Election Change (Former Spouse)), dated 4 November 1995.

	e.  Marriage Certificate, dated 27 December 1997.

4.  On 16 September 2008, the applicant submitted another copy of pages 1 and 4 of his divorce decree, dated 4 November 1994, and a copy of his marriage license to Carolyn, dated 27 December 1993.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s records show he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 March 1974 and was trained in military occupational specialty (MOS) 13B (Cannon Crewmember).  He married his spouse Catheren on 22 April 1983.  His records also show that he executed a series of extensions and/or reenlistments in the Regular Army and was placed on the Retired List in the retired grade of sergeant first class (SFC) on 1 April 1994.

3.  On an unknown date prior to his retirement, the applicant elected spouse and children SBP coverage at full amount.

4.  On 4 November 1994, the applicant and his spouse Catheren, were divorced. A complete copy of the divorce decree is not available for review with this case.

5.  On 4 November 1995, the applicant executed an SBP Election Change to former spouse coverage.  The accompanying Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, also dated 4 November 1994, shows that the election was not made pursuant to a court order; rather, as a result of an agreement between the applicant and his former spouse.  The applicant and his spouse authenticated this form by placing their signatures and dates in the appropriate location and a witness also authenticated this form by placing her signature and date in the appropriate location.

6.  On 27 December 1997, the applicant married his second spouse, Carolyn.

7.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records show that the applicant continued to pay SBP premiums at the former spouse and children rate.  

8.  In his self-authored statement, dated 21 April 2008, the applicant makes a complaint to the Board that his former spouse forged his signature on the SBP Election Change Certificate and that he would like this Board to review all documents and refund him all the monies paid from 4 November 1995 to present.

9.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  This Law also provides that every member having a spouse and/or child(ren), who retired/transfers to the retired list on or after that date, is automatically covered under SBP at the maximum rate unless he/she elected otherwise before retirement or transfer to the retired list.

10.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former spouses of retiring members.

11.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members (including Reservists).

12.  Public Law 98-525, enacted 19 October 1984, provided that a former spouse could request a deemed election within one year of the court order requiring SBP to be established on the former spouse’s behalf, provided the member agreed to provide coverage.

13.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.

14.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that upon retirement, the applicant elected spouse and children SBP coverage.  He was subsequently divorced and made an election, in the presence of a witness, to change his SBP election from “spouse and children” to “former spouse and children” coverage. 

2.  The applicant’s contention that his former spouse forged his signature is noted; however, he did not produce any evidence, such as a court order or a police investigation report that supports this contention and proves that his signature was forged.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) is not an investigative agency or a legal court.  The ABCMR corrects records based on error or injustice supported by the evidence of record.  

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement in this case.  Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010160



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010160



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003713C070205

    Original file (20060003713C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former spouses of already retired members and reservists. The evidence of record shows that the FSM was placed on the Retired List, and elected not to participate in the SBP. The evidence shows that the applicant, the former spouse, was entitled to Retired pay, not SBP by the divorce decree.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003451

    Original file (20130003451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired and deceased former service member (FSM), requests payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant and the FSM were divorced in 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009572

    Original file (20080009572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 March 1993, the FSM and his spouse, the applicant were divorced. He did not do so, and although the applicant provided copies of letters that show she did make a request for a deemed election of the SBP for former spouse coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law, there is no indication that these letters were received by DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003935

    Original file (20140003935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired and now deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her former husband's records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still serving on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011173

    Original file (20090011173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The divorce decree states that the applicant is named beneficiary under the Armed Services SBP and that the FSM's election to provide the SBP benefits to the applicant should be continued and maintained in full force and effect and should not be altered or withdrawn by the FSM during his lifetime. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010612

    Original file (20080010612.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her former spouse, a retired former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he timely filed a request with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse in accordance with the Final Decree of Divorce granted by the 27th District Court of Lampasas County, Texas. Her request was denied on 28 March 1996 because it was not timely filed within one year of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017452

    Original file (20090017452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The divorce decree issued for the applicant and his former spouse contains a provision stating the Decree of Dissolution would satisfy the applicant’s requirement for the applicant to submit a written request to change his initial election of SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse; or for the former spouse to submit a deemed election of former spouse coverage. Therefore, it is appropriate and will serve the interest of justice and equity to correct the applicant's record to show he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004681

    Original file (20090004681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement in 1977, the FSM elected full SBP spouse coverage. However, there is no indication that the FSM submitted the necessary forms to change his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of the divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" coverage to "former spouse" coverage" within one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010960

    Original file (20060010960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 11 November 1994. Although there is no evidence to show that either the FSM or the applicant requested that his SBP coverage be changed to former spouse coverage within the statutory one-year time limit, it appears that it was the FSM's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016598

    Original file (20080016598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. As a result, the...