Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010124
Original file (20080010124.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:		    8 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010124 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster).

2.  The applicant also requests, in effect, the Board provide him with a courtesy copy of orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewman Badge (Permanent).

3.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show all his awards and decorations.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of General Orders Number 3431, dated 20 July 1967, awarding him the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster) in support of his application:

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was furnished with a courtesy copy of orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewman Badge (Permanent), on 2 July 2008.  As a result, the Aircraft Crewman Badge (Permanent) will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.

3.  The applicant's record shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 October 1965.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67N (Single Rotor Turbine Helicopter Mechanic).  He was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) on 12 July 1967.  The highest rank/grade he attained during his military service was specialist five (SP5)/E-5.

4.  The applicant’s record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 16 May 1966 to 10 July 1967.  He served in various capacities and was assigned to different units as follows:

	a.  from 16 May 1966 to 15 February 1967, he was assigned as a Helicopter Repairman with the 484th Transportation Detachment; 

	b.  from 16 February 1967 to 30 May 1967, he was assigned as a Helicopter Repairman with the 282nd Aviation Company; and

	c.  from 31 May 1967 to 10 July 1967, he was assigned as a Crew Chief  with the 282nd Aviation Company.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), of the applicant’s DD Form 214, dated 12 July 1967, shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Aircraft Crewman Badge, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  Item 24 does not show award of the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster)

6.  Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders Number 1218, dated 9 April 1967, show the applicant was awarded the Air Medal for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 7 February 1967 to 13 March 1967.  However, General Orders Number 1229, dated 10 April 1967, issued by the same Headquarters, revoked the applicant's award of the Air Medal.
7.  Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders Number 1793, dated 12 May 1967, show the applicant was awarded the Air Medal for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 7 February 1967 to 13 March 1967.

8.  Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, General Orders Number 3431, dated 20 July 1967, show the applicant was awarded the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster), for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 13 March 1967 to 16 June 1967.

9.  Review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214.

10.  A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal.  Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his conduct and efficiency ratings were "Excellent" throughout his military service.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying.  Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 282nd Aviation Company was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 46, dated 1969.

13.  Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 29 January 1973, shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

14.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phases I; II; and III, campaigns during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  General Orders awarded the applicant the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster), for meritorious achievement while participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam, which is not shown on his records.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards.

2.  General Orders awarded the applicant's unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, which is not shown on his records.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.

3.  The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 5 October 1965 to 12 July 1967.  He received "Excellent" efficiency and conduct ratings, attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5, and was awarded multiple awards of the Air Medal.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

4.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, records show the applicant participated in three campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 5 October 1965 to 12 July 1967; and

	b.  showing award of the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the Air Medal (1st through 4th Oak Leaf Cluster), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal, in Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 12 July 1967.


									XXX
      _______________________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010124



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010124



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004131

    Original file (20080004131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012998

    Original file (20080012998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) effective 14 September 1969 to show award of the Bronze Star Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters and "V" Device, Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with a silver service star and two bronze service stars, [Republic of] Vietnam Campaign Medal [with 1960 Device], Air Medal with 33 Oak Leaf Clusters, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar, and any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005029

    Original file (20150005029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * his current DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)) does not address all of the Air Medals he was awarded * as proof, he points out the citation for the 3rd through 18th Oak Leaf Cluster for the Air Medal * he "actively participated in more than twenty-five aerial missions over hostile territory in support of counterinsurgency operations" during the period 7 June to 14 December 1967 (awards given in General Orders (GO) Numbers 942 through 944; they are all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20090001390

    Original file (AR20090001390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Records show the applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and that he participated in three campaign periods during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009376

    Original file (20090009376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Air Medal (18th through 20th oak leaf cluster). The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show three additional awards of the Air Medal (i.e., Air Medal with 18th through 20th oak leaf cluster) because he completed 77 combat hours and 139 combat missions in the RVN from 6 August 1967 to 29 September 1967 subsequent to his 17th award of the Air Medal. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008468

    Original file (20080008468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not contain orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewmember Badge. Army Regulation 672-5-1 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Aircraft Crewmember Badge for performing duties as a gunner from 1 March 1969 to 10 July 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010819

    Original file (20110010819.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019976

    Original file (20080019976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show this service medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Distinguished Flying Cross, Air Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018610

    Original file (20100018610.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Purple Heart by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, Special Orders Number 101, dated 23 May 1968. The evidence of record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 November 1966 through 6 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001089

    Original file (20080001089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter, dated 17 December 2007, from the National Personnel Records Center; his DD Form 214; a copy of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); orders discharging him from the U. S. Army Reserve; Specialist Five, E-5, promotion orders; Aircraft Crewman Badge orders; two sets of Army Commendation Medal orders; Distinguished Flying Cross orders; and ten sets of Air Medal orders. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...