Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010046
Original file (20080010046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080010046 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster to denote two awards of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded during March by enemy small arms fire and he continued his mission and tended to his wound by applying a large banana like leaf and cleaning it at each river crossing.  He suffered no serious consequences and the wound was not reported.  In November 1966, he was again wounded by enemy small arms fire.  He was hit in the left arm.  The wound was not serious.  The wound hurt but it was forgotten during his evasion and escape from the ambush site.  Once he had cleaned his weapons and changed to dry clothes, he applied a salve to the wound.  He knows of no report of the incident and he did not make a claim for a Purple Heart. 

3.  The applicant provides a letter of support from a former comrade.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 6 June 1954, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant, United States Army Reserve.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 
26 April 1957 and subsequently was transferred to the Army National Guard.  He continued to serve in a variety of assignments and was promoted through the ranks to colonel, pay grade O-6.  On 31 October 1979, he retired for length of service.  He had completed 20 years, 2 months, and 25 days of creditable active duty service.

3.  On 12 February 1966, the applicant was assigned duty with B Company, 5th Special Forces Group, 1st Special Forces, in the Republic of Vietnam. 

4.  On 31 January 1967, the applicant returned to the United States.  There is no available evidence of record showing that he was wounded during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam. 

5.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214), lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Air Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Legion of Merit, Meritorious Service Medal, Joint Service Commendation Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Presidential Unit Citation, Armed Forces Reserve Medal with Hour Glass Device, Vietnam Service Medal, Ranger Tab, Master Parachutist Badge, Combat Infantryman Badge, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Parachutist Badge, Persian Parachutist Badge, and the Persian Freefall Parachutist Badge.  It does not show award of the Purple Heart. 

6.  There is no available evidence in the applicant’s records or on the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) showing that he was awarded the Purple Heart. 

7.  The applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

8.  The applicant’s service medical records are not available for review.



9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  The letter of support provided by the applicant, dated 8 March 2008, written by a former comrade of the applicant, states, in part, that the applicant was wounded by enemy rifle fire.  It was a minor wound that was given medical treatment.  The wound was never reported and he did not receive a Purple Heart.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  While the letter of support reports that he was wounded as a result of enemy rifle fire, it is not sufficient evidence by itself upon which to base a correction of his records. 

2.  In view of the above the applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




__________ _ X   _______   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080010046



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015665

    Original file (20070015665.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 71st Evacuation Hospital, General Orders Number 36, dated 31 March 1970, show that the wounded Soldier, described in the applicant's self-authored statement, was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 30 March 1970. b. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to grant the applicant the Purple Heart and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015153

    Original file (20100015153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect a combat wound or injury and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show awards of the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal. His service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster; his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds; and his official medical records are not available for review. Notwithstanding his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024885

    Original file (20100024885.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided various records of medical care that show he sustained an injury during the discharge of a claymore mine by friendly forces and received medical treatment for this injury. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show he was wounded in action in Vietnam on or around 4 May 1970 which would entitle him to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026404

    Original file (20100026404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal. Since the governing regulation states only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, and the Silver Star is properly shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 September 1969, there is no basis for granting his request to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003126

    Original file (20130003126.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 18 September 1989, he was issued a second DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214 – Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that added to his DD Form 214 the Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device (1st Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011595

    Original file (20080011595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024384

    Original file (20100024384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), RVN Civil Actions Honor First Class Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Silver Star. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, effective 5 June 1970; DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005880C070208

    Original file (20040005880C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show this award. These awards are based on his participation in three campaigns during his Vietnam service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Good Conduct Medal for qualifying service from 11 August 1966 to 6 August 1968; b. amending his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 6 August 1968 to delete the Air Medal and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016215

    Original file (20100016215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). c. A statement, dated 22 January 2010, from a retired SFC and comrade who served with the applicant in Vietnam and has known him over the years. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.