Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009830
Original file (20080009830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        29 JULY 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009830 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that his race is white instead of black or African American. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that item 7a (Racial Category) of his DD Form 1966/1 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) has "Black or African American" checked, when in fact "White" should be checked.

3.  The applicant provides two copies of his DD Form 1966/1, his Enlisted Record Brief, a photocopy of his military identification card, certified copies of his birth certificate and marriage certificate, and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Applicant's Guide to Applying to the ABCMR in support of this application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is currently an enlisted Soldier on active duty in the Regular Army.

2.  Item 7a of the applicant's DD Form 1966/1 essentially shows that his racial category is black or African American.  However, two Police Record Check forms in his military records clearly show that his racial category was white.  The applicant provided a photocopy of his military identification card which shows that he is white, and also his marriage certificate which lists his race as white. 

3.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show that his race is white instead of black or African American. 

2.  With the exception of the applicant's DD Form 1966/1, the preponderance of the evidence clearly shows that his race is white, and not black or African American.  As a result, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his military records to show that his race is white and/or Caucasian.

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that his racial category is white and/or Caucasian.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009830



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009830



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001822

    Original file (20120001822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show his race as Black American (interpreted as Negroid) and his hair as brown. The applicant's available military record shows his race as both Caucasian and Negroid. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086035C070212

    Original file (2003086035C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant's DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment - Armed Forces of the United States), dated 10 October 1975, shows his race as Negro (currently known as African-American). There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that his race is Caucasian.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008284

    Original file (20140008284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. In a continuation of a response to a counseling received on 10 September 2012, recorded on a DA Form 4856, the applicant describes a conversation between him and the new DCO, occurring on or about 23 August 2012, which began with a discussion of the senior NCO's email, and went on to general review of the applicant's leadership style, as described by the two previous DCO's and informal interviews of team members done by the new DCO. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00876

    Original file (BC-2005-00876.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AF Forms 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) be corrected to reflect the same ailments. Her personnel record (SURF) lists her race as “Black/African American.” An AF Form 348, Line of Duty Determination, dated 16 January 2003, states the applicant was called to active duty and deployed to A1 Jaber Air Base, Kuwait and Bagram AAF, Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from 2 April 2002 through 14 July 2002. AF Form 356,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000770C070205

    Original file (20060000770C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    David K. Haasenritter | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his race as Native American. The fact that he now wishes to honor only the Native American heritage is insufficient reason to warrant a correction of the records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057867C070420

    Original file (2001057867C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be corrected to list his race as Caucasian. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008495

    Original file (20080008495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the service records of her mentally incompetent husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected as follows: a. change his racial category from white to Native American; b. correct his last name on his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), with an effective date of 29 July 2004; c. list all of his awards and decorations on his retirement DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 6 January 2006;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006401

    Original file (20130006401.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the records of her deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his race as “Negro” instead of "White." The FSM's military records are not available for review. The evidence submitted by the applicant clearly shows that the FSM’s race was “Negro” and his records should be corrected accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012678

    Original file (20090012678.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 7c (Color Hair), item 7d (Color Eyes) and the Social Security Number (SSN) entry in item 32 (Remarks). He further states the fifth digit of his SSN is 2 and not 8, as is currently listed on his DD Form 214. A review of all of item 7 of the applicant's DD Form 214 reveals that there were no entries made in items 7a and 7b and that the entries in item 7c and 7d were incorrect.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026624

    Original file (20100026624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is in the interest of justice to consider this case because: * It involves long-term institutional discrimination * It requires promotion and assignment data and statistics for proof * The National Guard Bureau (NGB) was often unresponsive to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and misdirected and/or delayed replies for many months * Key witness testimony was delayed * Counsel was delayed due to his own disability * The State Senator has concerns about discrimination within the...