Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009783
Original file (20080009783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        5 August 2008 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009783 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his retired pay grade as E-4.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he retired in the pay grade of E-4 but the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) is showing his retired pay grade as E-3.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 3 January 1967, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed his initial training and the Basic Airborne Course.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11B1P (Light Weapons Infantryman with parachutist qualification).

3.  On 5 July 1967, the applicant was assigned duty as a rifleman with the 
2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment, in the Republic of Vietnam. 

4.  On 22 November 1967, the applicant was medically evacuated from the Republic of Vietnam.

5.  On 15 January 1968, the applicant was promoted to specialist four, pay grade E-4.  The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows in Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was promoted to Specialist Four, E-4 on Special Orders 10, paragraph 33, Valley Forge General Hospital, dated 1968.

6.  Special Orders Number 65, paragraph 271, Headquarters, Department of the Army, dated 2 April 1968, directed the retirement of the applicant due to physical disability.  The order shows his rank and pay grade as private first class, E-3.

7.  On 2 April 1968, a Data for Retired Pay (AGPZ Form 977) was completed indicating that the applicant was permanently disabled.  It further indicates that the highest grade he attained was E-3, and showed E-3 as his retied pay grade.

8.  On 9 April 1968, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve due to a permanent disability, effective 10 April 1968.  Item 5a (Grade) of his DD Form 214 shows his pay grade as E-4.  His date of rank to specialist is shown as 15 January 1968.

9.  On 16 May 1979, the applicant was issued an United States Uniformed Services Identification Card (DD Form 2A, Retired), effective 10 April 1968, showing his rank and retired pay grade as specialist four, E-4.

10.  A DFAS Statement (DFAS-CL 7220/148), effective 2 December 2004, shows the applicant's rank as private first class [pay grade E-3].

11.  In a letter dated 25 April 2008, the Director, DFAS Cleveland, wrote that the applicant's military pay account cannot be corrected without orders from the [United States] Army.  It further extended an apology to the applicant for the poor customer service rendered to him by the DFAS.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was retired on 
10 April 1968, in the rank and pay grade of specialist four, E-4, due to a permanent physical disability.  Furthermore, the evidence clearly shows that the applicant's retirement orders reflected an incorrect rank and pay grade; therefore, the Data for Retired Pay form was incorrectly completed showing his highest pay grade held and his retired pay grade as E-3.

2.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be granted.

BOARD VOTE:

___X ___  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  amending Special Orders Number 65, paragraph 271, dated 2 April 1968 to show his rank as specialist four and his pay grade as E-4 and that he was retired in the pay grade of E-4 effective 10 April 1968; and

	b.  paying him any and all monies due as a result of this correction.





      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009783



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009783



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015299

    Original file (20110015299.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was retired from the Army, on 29 November 1968, in the rank/grade of private first class/E-3, with an honorable character of service and placed on the permanent disability retired list. However, having listed the correct SSN at the time of induction, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the same SSN at the time of separation. __________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009128

    Original file (20090009128 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank of specialist four/SP4 on 12 April 1974. Based on the evidence of record, the applicant was evaluated by an MEBD and then a PEB which placed him on the TDRL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was permanently retired with 70-percent disability in the grade of SP4/E-4 on 20 March 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075585C070403

    Original file (2002075585C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As supporting evidence he provides a Personnel Action, DA Form 4187, showing he was promoted to Specialist, E-4 effective 1 February 1994; an email dated 11 April 2000 showing he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List in the grade of Sergeant; and a copy of his retired identification card showing his rank as Sergeant, E-5. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The email message information stating he was placed on the disability retired list as a Sergeant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010490C070208

    Original file (20040010490C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board finally recommended that the applicant’s record be corrected to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 6 December 1968, by reason of physical disability rated at 30 percent; and permanently retired with entitlement to retired pay in the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served as defined in Title 10 of the United States Code, Section 1372. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009775

    Original file (20090009775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Orders Number 271, paragraph 38, United States Army Support Command, dated 27 September 1968, withdrew the applicant's primary MOS of 57A1O and awarded him primary MOS 94B2O, effective 13 September 1968. The evidence of record shows the applicant's primary MOS at the time of his release from active duty was 94B2O (Cook). In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009758

    Original file (20130009758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in his service record that show he was promoted to SP5/E-5 and/or the authority and effective date of promotion. Aside from his separation order that shows his rank as SP5, there is nothing in his service record showing he reappeared before the promotion board, that he was recommended for promotion, or a promotion instrument (order) affecting his promotion. In the absence of such orders and/or the authority for this promotion, there is insufficient evidence to grant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003704

    Original file (20150003704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also shows in: * Items 5a and 5b - PFC(P) and E-3 respectively * Item 6 (Date of Rank) - 21 September 1967 * Item 24 - the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Item 30 (Remarks) - continuation of item 5a, PFC/E-3 (Permanent), date of appointment and date of rank 21 September 1967 15. After he was wounded, the applicant was reassigned from Vietnam in the rank/grade of PFC/E-3,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018474

    Original file (20140018474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. In order to be eligible for temporary appointment to pay grade E-4, a Soldier must have completed 6 months in pay grade E-3, be in an appointable status, and hold and be serving in the MOS in which the appointments are authorized. The permanent appointment of Regular Army Soldiers in the grade in which serving would become automatic for pay grade E-4 at 12 months? It stated that items 5a and 5b would show the active duty rank and pay grade at the time of the Soldier's separation, taken...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020327

    Original file (20130020327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his date of birth (DOB) as 14 January 1947 * his rank at the time of discharge as specialist four (SP4) * award of the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) 2. The evidence of record shows the applicant listed his DOB as 4 January 1947 upon his...