IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 17 September 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080009766
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge.
2. The applicant states that he was not provided due process of law because he was not afforded proper legal representation at the time of his discharge.
3. The applicant provides an application for the review of discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States, a letter of clearance from a local police department, a letter from his ministry, a letter from a veteran center, and a letter from a community meal organization.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military records show that he was inducted and entered active duty on 23 August 1967.
3. The applicant completed his initial entry training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of light weapons infantryman.
4. The applicant was confined by civilian authorities from 27 January to 8 May 1968 for unlawful use of an automobile by driving without a license and registration.
5. On 8 August 1969, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 17 September 1968 to 22 July 1969. His sentence included confinement for 6 months.
6. The applicant served his sentence to confinement from 22 July to 15 October 1969.
7. On 31 October 1969, the applicant again departed AWOL.
8. The applicant was apprehended and returned to military control on 20 June 1974.
9. Court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 31 October 1969 to 20 June 1974.
10. In an undated letter, the applicant requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. In that request he acknowledged that he was guilty of the charge against him, that he had been afforded the opportunity to consult with appointed counsel for consultation, that he had consulted with counsel for consultation who fully advised him of the nature of his rights under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, that he could be given an undesirable discharge which would result in him being deprived of many or all Army benefits, that I may be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration, and that I may be deprived of my rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State Law.
11. That request was approved by the appropriate authority. Accordingly, on
2 August 1974, the applicant was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He had 11 months and 9 days of creditable service and had 2,189 days time lost prior to the expiration of his term of service (ETS), and 1,745 days of lost time after his ETS date.
12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However, at the time of the applicant's separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant has submitted documents to show that he is now a law-abiding citizen who is a credit to his community.
2. While the applicants community involvement is certainly commendable, it is insufficient to warrant upgrading a discharge which the applicant himself requested.
3. The applicant was AWOL for 3,934 days, he was incarcerated by civilian authorities for 103 days, and he was confined by military authorities for 86 days. Such service record is certainly not under honorable conditions (a general discharge).
4. Contrary to the applicants contention, he was provided legal counsel and consulted with legal counsel prior to making his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. As such, this contention is not accepted.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X_____ ___X____ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080009766
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080009766
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100515C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a statement in support of his request for a chapter 10 discharge in which he indicated that he had gone AWOL due to medical and family problems. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002901
BOARD DATE: 13 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002901 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous requests for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009568C071029
The applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge, with his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions, in the rank and pay grade of Private, E-1, on 6 September 1974, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 10, for conduct triable by court-martial. The characterization of service for this type of discharge was normally under other than honorable conditions and the type of discharge normally issued at the time of the applicant's discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007631C070205
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged on 23 January 1970 under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate with service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001931
The applicant's military personnel record shows that at the age of 18, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 January 1969 for a period of 2 years. The applicant was assigned to the U.S. Army Depot in Thailand during the period from 14 September 1970 to 13 February 1971. At the time he went AWOL he was 23 years of age.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018209
On 5 August 1974, the separation authority approved the applicants request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an undesirable discharge. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026193
On 25 March 1974, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed the issuance of an undesirable discharge. On 29 June 1981, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for a general discharge. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017073
The applicant provides: * 2 self-authored statements * Reference letter, dated 27 August 2012 * DD Form 293 (Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States), dated 18 June 2012 * General Discharge Certificate * Letter, U.S. Army Office of the Adjutant General, dated 16 October 1978 * Presidential Pardon, dated 23 August 1975 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Letter, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 23 December...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015160C070206
The applicant stated, in his 11 June 2004 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), that he could not have been discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, as the court-martial charges preferred against him were for a special court- martial that was not empowered to adjudge a bad conduct discharge. He states that, in effect, those records and his service medical records should have been reviewed and considered by the commander for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020563
In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he would normally be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. However, at the time the applicant was discharged an undesirable discharge was considered appropriate. The applicant's request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to grant his request.