Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009704
Original file (20080009704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        12 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009704 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal of the entry “Unsuitability-Homosexuality” from Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states that the narrative reason for separation should be removed because the wording has consistently provided a basis for perceived or factual discrimination against him with regards to his entitlement to veteran benefits and employment consideration afforded to all veterans.  He also states that the current Department of Defense (DOD) “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy is a clear indicator that discrimination exists in civilian and military circles and that the wording on his record merely contributes to that situation which he has endured for almost 30 years.

3.  The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 18 June 1979.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training (AIT) and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05H (Electronic Warfare/Signal Intelligence-Morse Interceptor).  The highest rank he attained during his military service was private first class (PFC)/E-3.

3.  The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar.  

4. On 3 October 1980, by memorandum, the U.S. Army Central Personnel Security Clearance Facility, Fort Meade, Maryland, notified the applicant of his ineligibility for access to sensitive compartmented information (SCI).  This determination was based on the applicant’s approach toward several individuals wherein he asked them to participate in homosexual activity or stated to them that he was homosexual.  Furthermore, during a psychiatric evaluation conducted on 15 August 1980, the applicant claimed a three year history of homosexuality.  The notification memorandum also stated that it was the opinion of the commanding officer that the applicant’s homosexual advances were deliberate attempts to avoid overseas service.

5.  The applicant’s records show that subsequent to the determination of his SCI ineligibility, he was reassigned on 24 October 1980 to Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, to attend MOS 71D (Legal Specialist) AIT. 

6.  On 5 November 1980, the applicant admitted to his platoon sergeant of his sexual orientation and discussed with him the possibility of a discharge from the Army.

7.  On 7 November 1980, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate elimination proceedings against him under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for admission of pre-service homosexuality.  




8.  On 13 November 1980, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification memorandum to separate him.  He consulted with legal counsel, and was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation for homosexuality, the type of discharge he could receive and its effect on further enlistment or reenlistment, the possible effects of this discharge, and of the procedures/rights that were available to him.  He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers and waived personal appearance before a board of officers.   

9.  The applicant also acknowledged that he understood that he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge under honorable conditions was issued to him and that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits as a veteran under Federal and State laws.  The applicant further elected to submit a statement on his behalf.  In his statement, the applicant requested an honorable discharge.

10.  On 26 November 1980, the applicant’s immediate commander initiated separation action against the applicant, in accordance with paragraph 13-4(d) of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of admission of pre-service homosexuality. The immediate commander remarked that the applicant was advised to separate his homosexual preference from his military life and had a change in room assignment to limit the close contact that might have occurred with prolonged relationship.  The immediate commander further remarked that the applicant was satisfied with his homosexuality and the course of action taken to separate him.

11.  On 28 November 1980, the applicant’s intermediate commander concurred with the immediate commander’s recommendation and recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge.  He further recommended an Honorable Discharge Certificate.   

12.  On 4 December 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge from the Army under the provisions of paragraph 13-3d of Army Regulation 600-200 and directed he receive an Honorable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 10 December 1980.  The DD Form 214 he was issued confirms he was discharged with an honorable discharge and that he completed 1 year, 5 months, and 23 days of creditable active military service.  Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of this form shows the entry “Unsuitability-Homosexuality.” 





13.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), then in effect, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 13-4 provided for separation due to inaptitude, personality disorder, apathy, and homosexuality applied to separation for unfitness and unsuitability.  At that time, action was to be taken to discharge an individual for unsuitability when, in the commander's opinion, it was clearly established that:  the individual was unlikely to develop sufficiently to participate in further military training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier or the individual's psychiatric or physical condition was such as to not warrant discharge for disability.  Unsuitability included inaptitude, character and behavior disorders, disorders of intelligence and transient personality disorders due to acute or special stress, apathy, defective attitude, and inability to expend effort constructively, enuresis, chronic alcoholism, and homosexuality.  Evaluation by a medical officer was required and, when psychiatric indications are involved, the medical officer must be a psychiatrist, if one was available.  A general or honorable discharge was considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors that would tend to jeopardize his rights.  The applicant was satisfied with his homosexuality and the course of action taken to separate him.  He acknowledged that he understood the ramifications of his discharge and consulted with legal counsel prior to accepting discharge.

2.  The applicant’s narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200 due to his admitted homosexuality.  Absent the homosexuality, there was no fundamental reason to process the applicant for discharge.  The underlying reason for his discharge was his unsuitability for the Army due to homosexuality.  The only valid narrative reason for separation permitted under that paragraph is "Unsuitability-Homosexuality.” 

3.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant appear to have been fully protected throughout the separation process.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Therefore, he is not entitled to relief.

4.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits. 
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009704



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009704



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017650

    Original file (20120017650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable. On 2 October 1980, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13, by reason of unsuitability (apathy). His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, with his service characterized as under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006887

    Original file (20090006887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, on 28 April 1980, the applicant was discharged. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued confirms he was discharged for unsuitability-apathy, defective attitude or inability to expend effort constructively in accordance with chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200, with an Under Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017525

    Original file (20080017525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 22 October 1980, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action on her under the provisions of chapter 13-4c, Army Regulation 635-200, for unsuitability. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant's disciplinary history which included her acceptance of NJP for being AWOL for 15 days which clearly diminished the quality of her service below that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011228

    Original file (20120011228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 February 1980, an official of the 573rd Personnel Service Company, Fort Bragg, NC, initiated a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) adjusting her enlistment grade from E-1 to E-3 effective 5 February 1979 (date of enlistment) in accordance with Army Regulation 601-280 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program). She was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action for unsuitability, the type of discharge she could receive and its effect on further enlistment or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020585

    Original file (20110020585.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge and change of the reason and authority for his discharge. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, Subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to follow when taking action on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006338

    Original file (20130006338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 11 March 1981 with a General Discharge Certificate. The applicant argues in his statement that his commander informed him on 6 March 1981 that if he agreed to an under than honorable condition discharge, he would upgrade his discharge to honorable within a year and it did not occur. Service of Soldiers separated because of unsuitability under this regulation was characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013647

    Original file (20130013647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for this period further shows: * character of service of under honorable conditions * authority for separation as Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 13-4d * separation program designator (SPD) code of JML * RE code of 3 * narrative reason for separation of unsuitability - homosexuality 8. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, Subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018231

    Original file (20140018231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was found unfit to perform and continue his military service because of physical disability due to three hernia injuries * his multiple injuries interfered with his ability to perform his job requirements * the derogatory narrative reason for separation and codes on his DD Form 214 misconstrues the real reason for his separation * he was instead chaptered out for motivational problems and/or a defective attitude when the real reason should have been his chronic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016717

    Original file (20080016717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016717 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 6 May 1980. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003255

    Original file (20110003255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 August 1966, the applicant's unit commander recommended he be required to appear before a board of officers to consider his separation from the Army under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability), unsuitability. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 23 September 1966 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 with a separation program number (SPN) of 264 and 40A and Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted...