IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE:
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080009351
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to fully honorable.
2. The applicant states he went absent without leave (AWOL) because he was suffering from combat stress and didnt know how to cope with being around civilians or adapt to his new environment after arriving back to the United States. The applicant asked that the Board waive the statute of limitations in his case since he has been diagnosed with a mental disorder.
3. The applicant provides his separation document (DD Form 214).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military records show that he enlisted in the United States Army Reserve in October 1979, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4. On 4 January 1986 the applicant was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service.
3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 March 1988. He served in Southwest Asia during Operation Desert Shield/Storm from 8 September 1990 to 31 March 1991.
4. In an undated memorandum, the applicant voluntarily declared that he was AWOL from 3 May to 20 June 1991. The applicant stated that I make this admission for administrative purposes only so I may process out of the Army and realize in doing so I may be given an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
5. The applicants discharge packet is not contained in his records. However, on 13 September 1991 the applicant was discharged UOTHC under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of court-martial.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Since the applicants discharge packet is not contained in his records, a presumption of administrative regularity is applied, that what the Army did was correct.
2. The applicant has not submitted any documentation to show that he has been diagnosed with a mental disorder. However, even if he had it would not form the basis for upgrading his discharge. Being diagnosed with a mental problem long after a Soldier is discharged does not indicate that the Soldier suffered from the mental problem while he was on active duty.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________X____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080009351
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080009351
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011670
The applicant requests that his discharge be upgraded from under other than honorable conditions to a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The applicant contends that he has been diagnosed with depression/PTSD and that his discharge should be upgraded so that he can get the proper treatment he needs from the VA. His discharge packet is not available, and there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011883
The applicant requests item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from Personality Disorder to Disability (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)). At the time of his diagnosis, the medical authorities were privy to medical information pertaining to PTSD; however, in their professional opinions the applicant suffered from a personality disordered which required discharging him under the provisions of Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005589
The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to a general discharge based on a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 3 September 2014, the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards and Service Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records to carefully considered the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical consideration, and mitigating factors when taking actions on applications from former service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001143
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 September 2005, the Army Discharge Review Board determined he had been properly discharged and denied his request for a change in the type and nature of his discharge. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOTHC was considered appropriate at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003458
He was discharged on 24 December 1991. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. His service was not interrupted by any medical or mental condition.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019877
The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He believes that he should have received an honorable discharge or medical discharge. She discussed the applicant's mental health during basic training and the death of his father.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013653
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's service medical records are not available. On 13 August 2001, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for an honorable upgrade.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014471
The applicant requests correction of her military records to show that she was separated from the service for medical reasons. The report of this evaluation stated that the applicant's behavior was suspicious. The available evidence shows the applicant performed her duties in a satisfactory manner through October 1991.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021551
He fully understood the nature of the administrative action initiated against him, but stated it was of little consequence to him. An Army Council of Review Boards Case Report and Directive, dated 25 February 1991, contains a summary of the facts and circumstances of his discharge showing, in part: (1) On 28 March 1983, he was charged with: * failure to go on 22 March 1983 * disobeying a lawful order on 4, 15, 16, 21, and 24 March 1983 * being disorderly in command on 4 and 24 March...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018266
He provides: * Four letters from family members * Several mental health reports * Medical statements * Six Records of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The mental health reports he provided were considered.