IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009229 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH).  

2.  The applicant does not provide a statement.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a Purple Heart Certificate in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents on file for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  This case is being considered using reconstructed records.

3.  The applicant's record shows that he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 8 January 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman), and Sergeant (SGT) (T) is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.  The applicant served in Vietnam from 9 June 1968 to 
8 June 1969.

4.  The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  The record also contains no medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving in the Vietnam. 

5.  On 17 December 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing a total of 1 year, 11 months, and 10 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards:  The National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), the Army Commendation Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).  The PH is not included in the list of awards on the DD Form 214, and the applicant authenticated the DD Form 214 with his signature in Item 32 (Signature of Person Being Transferred or Discharged) on the date of his separation.  

6.  During the processing of this case, a member of the Boards staff reviewed the Department of the Army (DA) Vietnam Casualty Roster.  There was no entry pertaining to the applicant on this list of Vietnam casualties.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to award of the PH.  It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention was carefully considered.  However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel; and the treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 

2.  The available record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority while serving on active duty.  It also contains no medical treatment records that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the Vietnam.  

3.  Further, the Purple Heart is not included in the list of awards contained on the applicant's DD Form 214, which he authenticated with his signature on the date of his separation.  In effect, his signature was his verification that the information contained on the DD Form 214, to include the list of awards, was correct on the date the separation document was prepared and issued.  

4.  Finally, the applicant's name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, the official DA list of RVN battle casualties.  Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in Vietnam, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart, has not been satisfied in this case.  

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement related to award of the Purple Heart.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009229



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009229



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1