Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009056
Original file (20080009056.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       18 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009056 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her discharge orders be changed to show she was discharged on 26 June 2007.  In an email from the 807th Medical Command’s Inspector General’s office, the applicant amended her application   to request her discharge orders be changed to show she was discharged on     24 June 2007.

2.  The applicant states that she was sent to annual training on 8 June 2007 through 24 June 2007 without being aware of her discharge.  She cannot be paid for that training because of the date on her discharge orders.  

3.  The applicant provides discharge orders, dated 6 June 2007; two sets of annual training orders, dated 4 June 2007; three pages of a Personnel Ordered to Annual Training list; and a two June 2008 emails.  Through the 807th Medical Command’s Inspector General’s office, she provided amended annual training orders, dated 8 June 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the U. S. Army Reserve, Army Nurse Corps, on 18 April 2003.  She was promoted to first lieutenant on   14 June 2004.

2.  On 17 July 2005, the applicant submitted a request for resignation in lieu of elimination.  

3.  Orders, dated 4 June 2007, ordered the applicant, with her unit (from Seagoville, TX), to annual training in Rapid City, SD, for the period 8 June to     23 June 2007.

4.  On 5 June 2007, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for resignation in lieu of elimination.

5.  Orders, dated 6 June 2007, discharged the applicant from the U. S. Army Reserve effective 6 June 2007.  

6.  Orders, dated 8 June 2007, amended the applicant’s annual training orders  to add that Soldiers outside commuting distance were authorized lodging on      23 June 2007.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant performed annual training in June 2007 in good faith.  She should not be penalized because her unit did not receive her 6 June 2007 discharge orders in time to discharge her before sending her on annual training.

2.  Based upon the amended annual training orders, it would be equitable to amend the applicant’s discharge orders to show she was discharged effective   25 June 2007 (allowing for travel on 24 June 2007 to return her to her home station in Texas).

BOARD VOTE:

___xx___  ___xx___  __xx____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.   amending her 6 June 2007 orders discharging her from the U. S. Army Reserve to show her effective date of discharge as 25 June 2007; and 
     b.  paying to her all pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.




      _______ xxxx_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009056





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009056



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015624

    Original file (AR20130015624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 September 2012, the administrative separation board recommended the applicant be separated from the USAR with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 149, dated 17 August 2013, an undated self-authored statement, a copy of her appeal of a Show Cause Board, dated 29 January 2013, her military biography, dated June 2013, three letters of support from MAJ L, CPT R, and Mr. R., discharge orders, dated 10 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011325

    Original file (20100011325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also requests credit for her 3 years of service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from 18 May 2007 to 17 May 2010, credit for 14 days of annual training that she would have served in the IRR for each of the 3 years since the error occurred, and if any correction action is taken, correction to her records to show she had been in the IRR continuously from 18 May 2007 until the effective date of any corrective changes and that she be given sufficient time to transfer from the IRR to a troop...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012556

    Original file (20140012556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides * Active duty commissioning agreement * Self-authored memorandum to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) and this Board * Orders A-07-019747 (active duty) and amendments * DD Form 214, ending on 30 June 2014 * Request for Unqualified Resignation * Approval of unqualified resignation * Orders 024-0009 (release from active duty) * June 2014 LES * Breakdown of her debt * Bonus recoupment worksheet * Email exchange with her assignment officer * Printout of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062869C070421

    Original file (2001062869C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides a five page statement to this Board that presents, in effect, his contentions: that he did not have an inappropriate relationship with a woman, not his wife, nor did he commit an act of assault on his wife; that the GOMOR and referred OER are based on misconstrued circumstances and evidence; and that the evidence provided by the woman, not his wife, with whom he is alleged to have had an intimate relationship, was false. The rater wrote, “(The applicant) received a Memorandum of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020087

    Original file (AR20120020087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board recommended the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. S Army Reserve involuntarily separated her after she had failed to participate with her reserve unit and issued her an under other than honorable discharge. Arlington, VA Date: 1 April 2013 The Army Discharge Review Board, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in page 1, directs the ARBA Promulgation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000894

    Original file (20080000894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the narrative reason for her separation was determined solely by the only adverse information in her records – the unfavorable Officer Evaluation Report (OER) for the period 6 October 1992 through 9 April 1993 that was subsequently appealed, deleted, and the rating period declared non-rated. The applicant provides a memorandum, dated 15 June 1995, from the Appeals and Corrections Branch, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) with a memorandum for record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016879

    Original file (20080016879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 APRIL 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080016879 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 135-155 also specifies that the unit commander will initiate position vacancy promotion procedures and forward a memorandum listing all unit officers eligible for promotion consideration. Nevertheless, the applicant has not sufficiently shown that he would have been selected for the position vacancy absent the loss of his promotion packet and,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001245

    Original file (20150001245 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * his appeal is based on substantive error; it has already been reviewed by the Enlisted Special Review Board (ESRB) * he is providing additional information not considered by the ESRB which includes: * Individual Master Military Pay Account (MMPA) for the period July 2011 through June 2012 showing no participation with the rating unit other than the period 19 February 2012 to 25 February 2012 * Retirement Points Detail for the period January 2011 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007549

    Original file (20080007549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also provides a memorandum, dated 24 January 2006, subject: Implementation Guidance for Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Army National Guard (ARNG) Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Soldiers; an extract from Title 37, U. S. Code, section 308, with interpretive notes and decisions; a letter, dated 25 October 2005, from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Reserve Affairs) to a Member of Congress; an email, dated 5 May 2005; her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010872

    Original file (20080010872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080010872 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 8-2d of this regulation states that a Soldier with the rank of staff sergeant must be a graduate of the BNCOC - Active Army, the BNCOC-RC; or the Special Forces Qualification Course; or one of the courses listed in 8-2c above. Since there is no evidence to show the applicant graduated from BNCOC, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant’s request.