Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009005
Original file (20080009005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080009005 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 215, Correction To DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was discharged as a specialist, pay grade E-4.  

2.  The applicant states that when he requested an extra copy of his DD Form 214, a DD Form 215 was published which showed he was discharged as a private, pay grade E-3.  

3.  The applicant provides documents which he lists in his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 






substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 February 1989, was awarded the military occupational specialty of infantryman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  On 17 December 1992, the applicant was reduced to pay grade E-3 by his commander.  

4.  On 6 January 1993, the applicant was honorably discharged due to physical disability with severance pay.  His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a specialist, pay grade E-4.

5.  On 8 January 1993, the applicant’s separation orders were amended to show that he was being separated as a private first class, pay grade E-3. 

6.  On 6 August 1993, a DD Form 215 was issued which showed the applicant was discharged as a private, pay grade E-3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4, he was reduced to private, pay grade E-3 prior to his discharge.

2.  As such, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009005





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080009005



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001866

    Original file (20120001866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be changed to show an RE code that would permit him to reenter the military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing on his DD Form 214 his RE code as 2B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017064

    Original file (20070017064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 4187-E, dated 13 December 1993, and DFAS Leave and Earnings Statement show the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-4 prior to his separation from active duty. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to paying the applicant for 25.5 days accrued leave if the audit of his records shows he has already been paid...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023468

    Original file (20110023468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show awards for his service in Iraq and by amending the following: a. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Iraq Campaign Medal with one bronze service star...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000278

    Original file (20110000278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her date of discharge as 23 September 1993, her characterization of service as honorable, and her rank as specialist, pay grade E-4. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR and was ordered to ADT in July 1990. Therefore, her rank as recorded on her DD Form 214 appears to be correct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007693

    Original file (20080007693.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of the Board’s denial of her request to correct her separation document (DD Form 214) to show that her pay grade was E-4 upon her release from active duty and to reflect that she participated in Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. The DD Form 215 dated 18 March 1997 shows that the applicant's record was corrected to show specialist four, E-4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009003

    Original file (20080009003.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his enlistment contract, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, assignment orders, Personnel Action (DA Form 4187), discharge orders, Honorable Discharge Certificates, birth certificate, and social security card. The available evidence shows that the applicant was provided discharge orders from the USAR on three different dates and an Honorable Discharge Certificate from the USAR on two different dates. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001919

    Original file (20070001919.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his rank as sergeant, pay grade E5; discharge date as 29 October 1993; three bronze service stars on his Southwest Asia Service Medal; and award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant had been promoted to sergeant, pay grade E5 prior to his release from active duty. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018519

    Original file (20080018519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel also requests, as new issues, that the applicant's rank be restored to specialist/E-4; that all counseling statements indicating the applicant lacked the required security clearance be removed from his military records; that his disability rating be increased to 30 percent (i.e., a medical retirement) or in the alternative, grant him a full and fair Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) hearing; that a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003420

    Original file (20120003420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence shows he was diagnosed with PTSD following his deployment in Iraq. There is no evidence of record that shows he was advanced to specialist/E-4 after 28 September 2004 or prior to his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004144

    Original file (20090004144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), from private (PV2)/E-2 to specialist four (SP4)/E-4. Enlisted personnel undergoing special training may receive temporary promotion as follows: A School commandants and commanders of training installations are authorized to promote enlisted students who are undergoing school or specialist training of 36 weeks or...