Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008984
Original file (20080008984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008984 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to Item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the correct dates of his service in Afghanistan. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that Item 18, Line 7, reads 20080408 to 20080411 and should read 20070408 to 20080411, reflecting his one year of service, PDMRA [Post-Deployment/Mobilization Respite Absence].  He also states, in effect, that Item 12f (Foreign Service) should be compared with Item 18.  He believes this to be a typographical error.

3.  In support of his application, the applicant provides copies of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II), his active duty orders, his active duty release orders, his DD Form 214, and his Army National Guard (ARNG) discharge orders.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.   The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Arizona ARNG (AZARNG), in pay grade E-4, on 25 July 2003, with prior enlisted service in the Regular Army.  

2.  The applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and entered active duty on 3 January 2007.  

3.  The applicant was released from active duty on 6 May 2008, in pay grade E-4, and transferred to an AZARNG unit.  Item 12f of his DD Form 214 shows he was credited with 1 year and 2 days of foreign service.  Item 18, Line 2, contains the entry, "Service in Afghanistan 20070328 to 20080329, which corresponds with the 1 year and 2 days credit of foreign service annotated in Item 12f.  Item 18, Lines 6 and 7, contains the entry, "PDMRA from 20080408 to 20080411."  It is believed these are the dates during which he took his PDMRA leave.  

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states, in pertinent part, that foreign service performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in Item 12f.  The regulation also states that the amount of foreign service will be taken from the Soldier’s Military Personnel Records Jacket.  However, for active duty Soldiers deployed with their unit during their continuous period of active service, the entry "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) from (Inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD) will be entered in Item 18 of the DD Form 214.  

5.  On 19 January 2007, the Secretary of Defense established a new category of administrative absence.  PDMRA was established to recognize members who are required to mobilize or deploy with a frequency beyond established Department of Defense rotation policy goals.  Active component and Reserve component Soldiers on their first 15 months qualifying (commencing after 19 January 2007) mobilization/deployment would earn 3 days of PDMRA.  PDRMA earned under this program is considered non-chargeable leave or administrative absence.  PDMRA credited period will be annotated in Item 18 of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214, Item 18, Line 7, does not correctly reflect his dates for his service in Afghanistan.  However, the evidence of record shows the applicant entered on active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom on 3 January 2007.  He was released from active duty on 6 May 2008.  He was issued a DD Form 214 that shows in Item 12f a credit of 1 year and 2 days of foreign service.  Item 18, Line 2, of this DD Form 214 shows he served in Afghanistan from 20070328 to 20080329, which represents the credit in Item 12f.  

2.  Item 18, Line 7, of his DD Form 214 shows the dates (20080408 to 20080411) during which he took his authorized PDMRA.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is not entitled to correction to Item 18, Line 7 of his DD Form 214.  He has provided no evidence to support his contention that the period of time shown on Line 7 of Item 18 is incorrect and should reflect any other dates.
3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008984



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008984


3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021172

    Original file (20100021172.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021172 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021178

    Original file (20100021178.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021178 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021687

    Original file (20100021687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021687 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023701

    Original file (20100023701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019620

    Original file (20100019620.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019620 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019608

    Original file (20100019608.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019608 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019630

    Original file (20100019630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019630 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019807

    Original file (20100019807.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019807 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019618

    Original file (20100019618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 August 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019618 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days he earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023703

    Original file (20100023703.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 November 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023703 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states she was released from active duty and not given the opportunity to use PDMRA days she earned and was entitled to. The available evidence shows the applicant served a qualifying period of active duty service under 10 USC for award of PDMRA.