IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        03 SEPTEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Purple Heart. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that he received a shrapnel wound in the forehead and the left side of his left eye during World War II, and that he was treated in a field hospital in Normandy, France, where they removed the shrapnel, bandaged him up, and sent him back to his unit.  He also hopes that the Department of the Army is able to verify this information with some medical records from that time.  

3.  The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge); WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), and Honorable Discharge Certificate; and a letter, dated 
15 May 2008, from the Richland County, Ohio Veterans Service Commission in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  A portion of the applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that a portion of the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there are sufficient remaining documents available to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The available records show that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 27 May 1943, and entered active duty on 3 June 1943.  He departed the continental United States on 27 February 1944 for the European Theater of Operations, and arrived in England on 10 March 1944.  He participated in the Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace, and Central Europe campaigns during World War II.  He returned to the continental United States on 27 November 1945, and was honorably released from active duty on 1 December 1945.  

4.  Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) of this same document contains the entry "None."  The applicant authenticated this document with his signature and thumbprint, attesting to the accuracy of the information contained on this form.

5.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 24 (Service Record) does not contain any evidence that he was wounded in action.  An insert to this form contains the following item:  "Under this heading will be shown all administrative matter not shown elsewhere, and not of a character authorizing pay.  Show wounds, battles, engagements, etc., and such other entries not set forth elsewhere where as may be required to make soldier's records complete."  After this entry, the applicant essentially certified with his signature that he had not incurred any disabilities since his induction.  A medical officer also certified that a physical inspection of the applicant indicated that he was in the same physical condition as at the time of his induction.   

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.  This regulation also provides that there is no time limitation on requests for award of the Purple Heart.  Each approved award of the Purple Heart must exhibit all of the following factors: wound, injury or death must have been the result of enemy or hostile act; international terrorist attack; or friendly fire; the wound or injury must have required treatment by military medical personnel; and the record of medical treatment must have been made a matter of official Army records.

7.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he should be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record.  Regrettably, in view of the foregoing, there is insufficient basis upon which to award the applicant the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during World War II.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008780



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008780



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1