Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008715
Original file (20080008715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	11 September 2008  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008715 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he believes he was eligible for the AGCM.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documentation in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 April 1969, served in Vietnam from 12 November 1969 to 5 November 1970, and was promoted to pay grade E-5.
3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 4 January 1972.  The separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal with oak leaf cluster (two awards), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-16 and M-14).

4.  The applicant’s DA Form 20, Enlisted Qualification Record, Item 38, Record of Assignments, shows that the applicant’s conduct and efficiency were always rated as excellent.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  A record of punishment is not automatically disqualifying.  However, at that time, a single efficiency rating of less than excellent was disqualifying.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.  Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.  At that time, nonfavorable consideration was normally noted on the DA Form 20.

6.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, shows the pertinent identified campaign periods, for which a bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal.  Those periods are:  Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 through 30 April 1970); DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May through 30 June 1970); and Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 through 30 June 1971).

7.  Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no indication in the applicant’s personnel records that he was awarded the AGCM.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his unit commander for award of the AGCM.  Records show the applicant’s conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his qualifying service and there is no indication of indiscipline in his service personnel records.

2.  As such, it would appear that the applicant was inadvertently not awarded the AGCM and it would now be appropriate to rectify that omission.

3.  The applicant is also entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars to be worn on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  __X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  Awarding him the AGCM for the period 1 April 1969 to 4 January 1972; and

   b.  Adding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and three bronze service stars to be worn on his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal to his DD Form 214.





      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008715





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008715



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011069

    Original file (20080011069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Civil Action Honor Medal, and Overseas Service Bars. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his unit commander for award of the AGCM. The Board determined that there was insufficient documentation in which to show the individual concerned is entitled to the Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009559

    Original file (20080009559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His separation document shows that he was awarded the PH, but does not show that he was awarded the AGCM, the BSM, or the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded the AGCM for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011592

    Original file (20080011592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002511

    Original file (20090002511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant contends he was awarded four AMs, with one for valor, there is only evidence that he was awarded one AM for meritorious service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to now award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal and to add that award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding to him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 September 1968 to 24 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012497

    Original file (20100012497.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he was informed at the time he was not entitled to the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds he incurred on 5 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008662

    Original file (20110008662.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant’s official records shows that the applicant had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007904

    Original file (20140007904.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and Army Commendation Medal. The applicant served in four campaigns and is entitled to wear four bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and have them added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016509C070206

    Original file (20050016509C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016509 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011599

    Original file (20080011599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his separation document, DD Form 214, be amended to add the Air Medal (AM) for Valor, the second and third award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for Valor (BSM for Valor with 2 Oak Leaf Clusters), a Purple Heart, and any other awards he may be entitled to receive. The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the BSM. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010180

    Original file (20080010180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Air Medal (AM) (Second Award) and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (First Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the already-awarded AM (Second Award) to the applicant's DD...